Chromosomal instability (CIN) is defined as the perpetual missegregation of whole chromosomes during mitosis and represents a hallmark of human cancer. However, the mechanisms causing CIN and its consequences on tumor growth are largely unknown. We identify an increase in microtubule plus end assembly rates as a fundamental trigger for CIN in CRC cells. This trigger is mediated by overexpression of the oncogene AURKA or by loss of the tumor suppressor gene CHK2, a genetic constitution found in 73% of human colorectal cancers. Increased microtubule assembly rates are associated with transient abnormalities in mitotic spindle geometry promoting the generation of lagging chromosomes and resulting in CIN. Reconstitution of proper microtubule assembly rates by chemical or genetic means suppresses CIN and thereby, unexpectedly, accelerates tumor growth in vitro and in vivo. Thus, we identify a fundamental mechanism triggering CIN in cancer cells and reveal its adverse consequence on tumor growth.

Chromosomal instability (CIN) is a major hallmark of human cancer and might contribute to tumorigenesis. Genes required for the normal progression of mitosis represent potential CIN genes and, as such, are important tumour suppressors. The Chk2 kinase and its downstream targets p53 and Brca1 are tumour suppressors that have been functionally linked to the DNA damage response pathway. Here, we report a function of Chk2, independent of p53 and DNA damage, that is required for proper progression of mitosis, and for the maintenance of chromosomal stability in human somatic cells. Depletion of Chk2 or abrogation of its kinase activity causes abnormal mitotic spindle assembly associated with a delay in mitosis, which promotes the generation of lagging chromosomes, chromosome missegregation and CIN, while still allowing survival and growth. Furthermore, we have identified Brca1 as a mitotic target of the Chk2 kinase in the absence of DNA damage. Accordingly, loss of BRCA1 or its Chk2-mediated phosphorylation leads to spindle formation defects and CIN. Thus, the CHK2-BRCA1 tumour suppressor pathway is required for chromosomal stability, which might contribute to their tumour suppressor function.

The mitotic Aurora kinases, including Aurora-A and Aurora-B, are attractive novel targets for anticancer therapy, and inhibitory drugs have been developed that are currently undergoing clinical trials. However, the molecular mechanisms how these drugs induce tumor cell death are poorly understood. We have addressed this question by comparing the requirements for an efficient induction of apoptosis in response to MLN8054, a selective inhibitor of Aurora-A, and the selective Aurora-B inhibitor ZM44-7439 in human colon carcinoma cells. By using various isogenic knockout as well as inducible colon carcinoma cell lines, we found that treatment with MLN8054 induces defects in mitotic spindle assembly, which causes a transient spindle checkpoint-dependent mitotic arrest. This cell cycle arrest is not maintained due to the activity of MLN8054 to override the spindle checkpoint. Subsequently, MLN8054-treated cells exit from mitosis and activate a p53-dependent postmitotic G 1 checkpoint, which subsequently induces p21 and Bax, leading to G 1 arrest followed by the induction of apoptosis. In contrast, inhibition of Aurora-B by ZM447439 also interferes with normal chromosome alignment during mitosis and overrides the mitotic spindle checkpoint but allows a subsequent endoreduplication, although ZM447439 potently activates the p53-dependent postmitotic G 1 checkpoint. Moreover, the ZM447439-induced endoreduplication is a prerequisite for the efficiency of the drug. Thus, our results obtained in human colon carcinoma cells indicate that although both Aurora kinase inhibitors are potent inducers of tumor cell death, the pathways leading to the induction of apoptosis in response to these drugs are distinct.

CHK2 is a multiorgan tumor susceptibility gene that encodes for a serine/threonine protein kinase involved in the response to cellular DNA damage. After ATM-mediated phosphorylation, the activated Chk2 kinase can act as a signal transducer and phosphorylate a variety of substrates, including the Cdc25 phosphatases, p53, PML, E2F-1, and Brca1, which has been associated with halting the cell cycle, the initiation of DNA repair, and the induction of apoptosis after DNA damage. In addition, recent work has revealed another, DNA-damage-independent function of Chk2 during mitosis that is required for proper mitotic spindle assembly and maintenance of chromosomal stability. This novel role involves a mitotic phosphorylation of the tumor suppressor Brca1 by the Chk2 kinase. On the basis of its role during DNA damage response, Chk2 has been suggested as an anticancer therapy target, but given its recently discovered new function and its role as a tumor suppressor, it is questionable whether inhibition of Chk2 is indeed beneficial for anticancer treatment. However, investigators may be able to exploit the loss of CHK2 in human tumors to develop novel therapies based on synthetic lethal interactions.

BRCA1 (breast cancer type 1 susceptibility protein) is a multifunctional tumor suppressor involved in DNA damage response, DNA repair, chromatin regulation, and mitotic chromosome segregation. Although the nuclear functions of BRCA1 have been investigated in detail, its role during mitosis is little understood. It is clear, however, that loss of BRCA1 in human cancer cells leads to chromosomal instability (CIN), which is defined as a perpetual gain or loss of whole chromosomes during mitosis. Moreover, our recent work has revealed that the mitotic function of BRCA1 depends on its phosphorylation by the tumor-suppressor kinase Chk2 (checkpoint kinase 2) and that this regulation is required to ensure normal microtubule plus end assembly rates within mitotic spindles. Intriguingly, loss of the positive regulation of BRCA1 leads to increased oncogenic Aurora-A activity, which acts as a mediator for abnormal mitotic microtubule assembly resulting in chromosome missegregation and CIN. However, how the CHK2–BRCA1 tumor suppressor axis restrains oncogenic Aurora-A during mitosis to ensure karyotype stability remained an open question. Here we uncover a dual molecular mechanism by which the CHK2–BRCA1 axis restrains oncogenic Aurora-A activity during mitosis and identify BRCA1 itself as a target for Aurora-A relevant for CIN. In fact, Chk2-mediated phosphorylation of BRCA1 is required to recruit the PP6C–SAPS3 phosphatase, which acts as a T-loop phosphatase inhibiting Aurora-A bound to BRCA1. Consequently, loss of CHK2 or PP6C-SAPS3 promotes Aurora-A activity associated with BRCA1 in mitosis. Aurora-A, in turn, then phosphorylates BRCA1 itself, thereby inhibiting the mitotic function of BRCA1 and promoting mitotic microtubule assembly, chromosome missegregation, and CIN.

Wnt signaling stimulates cell proliferation by promoting the G1/S transition of the cell cycle through b-catenin/TCF4-mediated gene transcription. However, Wnt signaling peaks in mitosis and contributes to the stabilization of proteins other than b-catenin, a pathway recently introduced as Wnt-dependent stabilization of proteins (Wnt/STOP). Here, we show that Wnt/STOP regulated by basal Wnt signaling during a normal cell cycle is required for proper spindle microtubule assembly and for faithful chromosome segregation during mitosis. Consequently, inhibition of basal Wnt signaling results in increased microtubule assembly rates, abnormal mitotic spindle formation and the induction of aneuploidy in human somatic cells.

BACKGROUND: We developed MTH1 inhibitors (MTH1i) TH588 and TH1579 showing broad anti-cancer activity, while structurally distinct MTH1i fail to kill cancer cells. Here, we describe a new role of MTH1 in mitosis and the detailed mechanism of action of TH1579 (karonudib) and other structurally distinct MTH1i. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cancer cell lines or zebrafish embryos were treated with MTH1i or siRNA targeting MTH1 and analysed primarily by live cell and immunofluorescence microscopy, survival assays, DNA fibre or COMET assays. MTH1 and tubulin interactions were analysed in vitro using co-immunoprecipitation and tubulin polymerisation assays. RESULTS: Here, we describe a mitotic role for the MTH1 protein, which binds to tubulin, is required for microtubule polymerisation, correct spindle assembly, mitosis progression and suppression reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation in mitosis. Potent MTH1i display differential abilities to break the MTH1-tubulin interaction and cause mitotic arrest, demonstrating 8-oxodGTPase and mitotic function of MTH1 are mechanistically distinct. TH588 and TH1579 have more profound effect on mitotic arrest than other MTH1i explained by additional direct inhibition of tubulin polymerisation. MTH1i only inhibiting 8-oxodGTPase activity synergize with mitotic poisons. CONCLUSIONS: Efficient MTH1 have a dual mechanism of action: inhibiting mitosis (to generate ROS) and promoting 8-oxodGTP incorporation into DNA during mitotic replication, dependent on ROS generation. Direct inhibition of tubulin polymerisation of TH588 and TH1579 increase their ability to arrest cells and generate ROS in mitosis. Furthermore, non-cytotoxic MTH1 can become effective and increase incorporation of oxidised nucleotides into DNA when combined with sub-therapeutic concentrations of mitotic inhibitors or challenged directly by 8-oxodGTP.

No abstract