Riboswitches regulate gene expression through direct and specific interactions with small metabolite molecules. Binding of a ligand to its RNA target is high selectivity and affinity and induces conformational changes of the RNA's secondary and tertiary structure. The structural difference of two purine riboswitches aptamers is caused by only one single mutation, where cytosine 74 in the guanine riboswitch is corresponding to a uracil 74 in adenine riboswitch. Here we employed molecular dynamics (MD) simulation, molecular mechanics Poisson-Boltzmann surface area (MM-PBSA) and thermodynamic integration computational methodologies to evaluate the energetic and conformational changes of ligands binding to purine riboswitches. The snapshots used in MM-PBSA calculation were extracted from ten 50 ns MD simulation trajectories for each complex. These free energy results are in consistent with the experimental data and rationalize the selectivity of the riboswitches for different ligands. In particular, it is found that the loss in binding free energy upon mutation is mainly electrostatic in guanine (GUA) and riboswitch complex. Furthermore, new hydrogen bonds are found in mutated complexes. To reveal the conformational properties of guanine riboswitch, we performed a total of 6 μs MD simulations in both the presence and the absence of the ligand GUA. The MD simulations suggest that the conformation of guanine riboswitch depends on the distance of two groups in the binding pocket of ligand. The conformation is in a close conformation when U51-A52 is close to C74-U75.

Drug resistance of mutations in HIV-1 protease (PR) is the most severe challenge to the long-term efficacy of HIV-1 PR inhibitor in highly active antiretroviral therapy. To elucidate the molecular mechanism of drug resistance associated with mutations (D30N, I50V, I54M, and V82A) and inhibitor (GRL-0519) complexes, we have performed five molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and calculated the binding free energies using the molecular mechanics Poisson–Boltzmann surface area (MM-PBSA) method. The ranking of calculated binding free energies is in accordance with the experimental data. The free energy spectra of each residue and inhibitor interaction for all complexes show a similar binding model. Analysis based on the MD trajectories and contribution of each residues show that groups R2 and R3 mainly contribute van der Waals energies, while groups R1 and R4 contribute electrostatic interaction by hydrogen bonds. The drug resistance of D30N can be attributed to the decline in binding affinity of residues 28 and 29. The size of Val50 is smaller than Ile50 causes the residue to move, especially in chain A. The stable hydrophobic core, including the side chain of Ile54 in the wild type (WT) complex, became unstable in I54M because the side chain of Met54 is flexible with two alternative conformations. The binding affinity of Ala82 in V82A decreases relative to Val82 in WT. The present study could provide important guidance for the design of a potent new drug resisting the mutation inhibitors.