Since the cancellation of the savings regulated in the Execution and Bankruptcy Law is a personal claim case that gives the creditor a foreclosure and sale authority, the transfer and sequestration of this receivable is possible. The condition that the saving subject to the cancellation proceedings developed by the Court of Cassation should be made after the birth of the debt may not be a credit originating from the exclusive person of the creditor who filed the cancellation lawsuit, but
and supervision of the supervisory authority. The custody provisions shall become effective in the event that the parent or guardian or both parents are appointed together after the parental occupation due to the restriction caused by the adult, even if the child is to be addressed by the parental relationship law. Moreover, the law stipulates that parents and grandparents should be assigned a parent, to prevent a third party from entering the family, and that the interests of adult restraint should be viewed at a higher level by the parent with blood ties. The parent or guardian is the legal representative of the adult restriction and is under the supervision and supervision of the family court, which is the supervisory authority, unless it is obliged to give permission and assurance about the management and use of the goods outside the free property of the adult restriction. Therefore, adult restraint does not require parent or father to be a parent from the supervision and supervision of the supervisory authority in the appointment of parents, representation, administration and legal proceedings.
In a court judgment, the summary of the parties' claims and defenses, the issues they agreed and disagreed with, the evidence collected about the contested cases, the discussion and evaluation of the evidence, the facts and the conclusions and legal reasons derived from them, one by one, will be manifested in the government in a manner that does not cause suspicion and hesitation. The justification acts as a bridge between the material facts determined by the court and the verdict clause. In the justification section, the legal principles on which the provision is based are explained. The judge automatically investigates and finds the legal nature of the material facts submitted to her by the parties, as a matter of her duty, and explains the legal rules on which her provision is based and the reasons for this in the justification. The justification is the legal identity and legitimacy of the judgment. Since the justification is the guarantee of the right to be heard and the ability to apply for legal remedies, it is a mandatory element of the provision. Life events that are brought to trial in the court, discussed and decided in the light of legal reasons, will come to life in the justification. In other words, the cases that are subject to investigation and under legal protection in the light of all legal reasons in the trial will come into existence in the justification and gain legal identity with the judgment. Therefore, the court should examine the cases of foreigners brought to the trial in the light of all legal reasons and indicate in detail in its justification. As a matter of fact, it would not be right to expect the parties to know the law and to prove the case that they put forward. If life events brought to the court and for which legal protection are requested are not investigated in the light of all legal reasons and are not specified in detail in the justification, even if the verdict reached by the court is correct, with the sanction of wrogful application of substantive law, they will be the victim of insufficient justification and the parties will not be subjectively protected.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.