A microarray analysis was performed to study the effect of varying combinations of water activity and temperature on the activation of aflatoxin biosynthesis genes in Aspergillusflavus grown on YES medium. Generally A. flavus showed expression of the aflatoxin biosynthetic genes at all parameter combinations tested. Certain combinations of a(w) and temperature, especially combinations which imposed stress on the fungus resulted in a significant reduction of the growth rate. At these conditions induction of the whole aflatoxin biosynthesis gene cluster occurred, however the produced aflatoxin B(1) was low. At all other combinations (25 degrees C/0.95 and 0.99; 30 degrees C/0.95 and 0.99; 35 degrees C/0.95 and 0.99) a reduced basal level of cluster gene expression occurred. At these combinations a high growth rate was obtained as well as high aflatoxin production. When single genes were compared, two groups with different expression profiles in relation to water activity/temperature combinations occurred. These two groups were co-ordinately localized within the aflatoxin gene cluster. The ratio of aflR/aflJ expression was correlated with increased aflatoxin biosynthesis.
A microarray analysis was used to examine the effect of combinations of water activity (a w , 0.995-0.90) and temperature (20 -428C) on the activation of aflatoxin biosynthetic genes (30 genes) in Aspergillus flavus grown on a conducive YES (20 g yeast extract, 150 g sucrose, 1 g MgSO 4 . 7H 2 O) medium. The relative expression of 10 key genes (aflF, aflD, aflE, aflM, aflO, aflP, aflQ, aflX, aflR and aflS) in the biosynthetic pathway was examined in relation to different environmental factors and phenotypic aflatoxin B 1 (AFB 1 ) production. These data, plus data on relative growth rates and AFB 1 production under different a w  temperature conditions were used to develop a mixed-growth-associated product formation model. The gene expression data were normalized and then used as a linear combination of the data for all 10 genes and combined with the physical model. This was used to relate gene expression to a w and temperature conditions to predict AFB 1 production. The relationship between the observed AFB 1 production provided a good linear regression fit to the predicted production based in the model. The model was then validated by examining datasets outside the model fitting conditions used (378C, 408C and different a w levels). The relationship between structural genes (aflD, aflM) in the biosynthetic pathway and the regulatory genes (aflS, aflJ) was examined in relation to a w and temperature by developing ternary diagrams of relative expression. These findings are important in developing a more integrated systems approach by combining gene expression, ecophysiological influences and growth data to predict mycotoxin production. This could help in developing a more targeted approach to develop prevention strategies to control such carcinogenic natural metabolites that are prevalent in many staple food products. The model could also be used to predict the impact of climate change on toxin production.
Fungal aetiology of keratitis/corneal ulcer is considered to be one of the leading causes of ocular morbidity, particularly in developing countries including India. More importantly, Fusarium and Aspergillus are reported commonly implicating corneal ulcer and against this background the present work was undertaken so as to understand the current epidemiological trend of the two fungal keratitis. During the project period, a total of 500 corneal scrapings were collected from suspected mycotic keratitis patients, of which 411 (82.2%) were culture positive for bacteria, fungi, and parasites. Among fungal aetiologies, Fusarium (216, 52.5% of 411) and Aspergillus (68, 16.5% of 411) were predominantly determined. While the study revealed a male preponderance with both the fungal keratitis , it further brought out that polyene compounds (natamycin and amphotericin B) and azoles were active, respectively, against Fusarium spp. and Aspergillus spp. Additionally, 94.1% of culture proven Fusarium keratitis and, respectively, 100% and 63.6% of A. flavus and A. fumigatus were confirmed by multiplex PCR. The sensitivity of the PCR employed in the present study was noted to be 10 fg/μl, 1 pg/μl, and 300 pg/μl of DNA, respectively, for Fusarium, A. flavus, and A. fumigatus. Alarming fact was that Fusarium and Aspergillus regionally remained to be the common cause of mycotic keratitis and the Fusarium isolates had a higher antifungal resistance than Aspergillus strains against most of the test drugs.
The influence of varying combinations of water activity (aw) and temperature on growth, aflatoxin biosynthesis and aflR/aflS expression of Aspergillus parasiticus was analysed in the ranges 17-42°C and 0.90-0.99 aw. Optimum growth was at 35°C. At each temperature studied, growth increased from 0.90 to 0.99 aw. Temperatures of 17 and 42°C only supported marginal growth. The external conditions had a differential effect on aflatoxin B1 or G1 biosynthesis. The temperature optima of aflatoxin B1 and G1 were not at the temperature which supported optimal growth (35°C) but either below (aflatoxin G1, 20-30°C) or above (aflatoxin B1, 37°C). Interestingly, the expression of the two regulatory genes aflR and aflS showed an expression profile which corresponded to the biosynthesis profile of either B1 (aflR) or G1 (aflS). The ratios of the expression data between aflS:aflR were calculated. High ratios at a range between 17 and 30°C corresponded with the production profile of aflatoxin G1 biosynthesis. A low ratio was observed at >30°C, which was related to aflatoxin B1 biosynthesis. The results revealed that the temperature was the key parameter for aflatoxin B1, whereas it was water activity for G1 biosynthesis. These differences in regulation may be attributed to variable conditions of the ecological niche in which these species occur.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.