Exposed Column Base Plate (ECBP) connections are commonly used in steel moment resisting frames. Current approaches for their design are well-established from a mechanistic standpoint.However, the reliability of connections designed as per these approaches is not as well understood.A detailed reliability analysis of the prevalent approach in the United States is performed in this study by using 59 design scenarios from steel moment frames subjected to combinations of dead, live, wind, and seismic loads. The analysis is conducted through Monte Carlo sampling reflecting uncertainties in the loads, material properties, component geometry, as well as demand and capacity models for the various components (base plate, footing, anchor rods) of the connection. Results indicate that the current design approach leads to unacceptable and inconsistent probabilities of failure across the various components. This is attributed to: (1) the use of a resistance factor for the footing bearing stress that artificially alters flexural demands on the base plate; and (2) the calibration of resistance factors for the plate and anchors without appropriate consideration of variability in demands. Two alternative approaches are examined as prospective refinements to the current approach. One eliminates the resistance factor for the bearing stress when used to determine flexural demands in the base plate, while the other considers overall failure of the connection, rather than failure of individual components within the connection. For both approaches, new resistance factors are calibrated to provide consistent and acceptable probabilities of failure across all limit states and all types of loading. Design and cost implications of these alternative approaches are summarized.
This paper presents a numerical study assessing the seismic performance of steel moment‐resisting frames (SMRFs) designed with ductile exposed column‐base plate (ECBP) connections employing yielding anchor rods. For their potential use as weak bases, the proposed ECBP detail is designed to accommodate plastic deformations in the anchors. The seismic performance of 2‐ and 4‐story archetype SMRFs with ECBPs is investigated to examine the effects of various base‐connection strengths on the frame collapse mechanisms and probabilities. To this aim, the ECBP connections of each frame are designed for a set of three strength levels, ranging from reduced seismic loads to capacity‐designed forces of the adjoining columns. These designs enable the base responses to vary from highly inelastic (i.e., weak‐base design) to elastic (i.e., strong‐base design) when subjected to earthquake‐induced ground shaking. Nonlinear time history analysis (NLTHA) is extensively performed, applying a suite of assembled ground‐motion sequences (i.e., two ground motions in series) to assess the ECBP connection response and the corresponding frame behavior. Fragility analyses accounting for only the first ground motions in each considered sequence (to derive fragility curves), and the entire ground‐motion sequences (to derive fragility surfaces) are also performed to evaluate the probabilities of frame collapse and base connection failure. Finally, key findings regarding the seismic performance of ductile ECBP connections and their effects on the frame collapse are discussed. The limitations of the study are also outlined.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.