Abstract Background Cryptococcal antigen (CrAg) screening and treatment with preemptive fluconazole reduces the incidence of clinically evident cryptococcal meningitis in individuals living with advanced human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) disease. However, mortality remains higher in CrAg-positive than in CrAg-negative patients with similar CD4+ T-lymphocyte counts. Methods We conducted a cohort study to investigate causes of morbidity and mortality during 6 months of follow-up among asymptomatic CrAg-positive and CrAg-negative (ratio of 1:2) patients living with HIV with CD4 counts <100 cells/µL attending 2 hospitals in Johannesburg, South Africa. When possible, minimally invasive autopsy (MIA) was performed on participants who died. Results Sixty-seven CrAg-positive and 134 CrAg-negative patients were enrolled. Death occurred in 17/67 (25%) CrAg-positive and 12/134 (9%) CrAg-negative participants (hazard ratio for death, adjusted for CD4 count, 3.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.4–6.7; P = .006). Cryptococcal disease was an immediate or contributing cause of death in 12/17 (71%) CrAg-positive participants. Postmortem cryptococcal meningitis and pulmonary cryptococcosis were identified at MIA in all 4 CrAg-positive participants, 3 of whom had negative cerebrospinal fluid CrAg tests from lumbar punctures (LPs) at the time of CrAg screening. Conclusions Cryptococcal disease was an important cause of mortality among asymptomatic CrAg-positive participants despite LPs to identify and treat those with subclinical cryptococcal meningitis and preemptive fluconazole for those without meningitis. Thorough investigation for cryptococcal disease with LPs and blood cultures, prompt ART initiation, and more intensive antifungals may reduce mortality among asymptomatic CrAg-positive patients identified through screening.

Universal birth testing for all HIV-exposed neonates is rapidly being achieved in South Africa, facilitating earlier detection of intrauterine infected neonates. However, the successful linkage into care of HIV-infected neonates and their treatment outcomes remain to be assessed.

BackgroundSouth Africa has utilized three independent data sources to measure the impact of its program for the prevention of mother–to–child transmission (PMTCT) of HIV. These include the South African National Health Laboratory Service (NHLS), the District Health Information System (DHIS), and South African PMTCT Evaluation (SAPMTCTE) surveys. We compare the results of each, outlining advantages and limitations, and make recommendations for monitoring transmission rates as South Africa works toward achieving elimination of mother–to–child transmission (eMTCT).MethodsHIV polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test data, collected between 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2014, from the NHLS, DHIS and SAPMTCTE surveys were used to compare early mother–to–child transmission (MTCT) rates in South Africa. Data from the NHLS and DHIS were also used to compare early infant diagnosis (EID) coverage.ResultsThe age–adjusted NHLS early MTCT rates of 4.1% in 2010, 2.6% in 2011 and 2.3% in 2012 consistently fall within the 95% confidence interval as measured by three SAPMTCTE surveys in corresponding time periods. Although DHIS data over–estimated MTCT rates in 2010, the MTCT rate declines thereafter to converge with age–adjusted NHLS MTCT rates by 2012. National EID coverage from NHLS data increases from around 52% in 2010 to 87% in 2014. DHIS data over–estimates EID coverage, but this can be corrected by employing an alternative estimate of the HIV–exposed infant population.ConclusionNHLS and DHIS, two routine data sources, provide very similar early MTCT rate estimates that fall within the SAPMTCTE survey confidence intervals for 2012. This analysis validates the usefulness of routine data sources to track eMTCT in South Africa.

Baseline data on laboratory-confirmed CRS will enable planning and monitoring of RCV implementation in the South African EPI program. Ninety-eight percent of mothers of infants with CRS were young women 14 to 30 years old, indicating a potential immunity gap in this age group for consideration during introduction of RCV.