The decision of Indonesian Constitutional Court No. 100/PUU-XII/2015 legitimizing single candidate give solution for democracy deadlock in some regions.Based on that decision, The Election Commission make a regulation giving alternative for some regions having only one candidate for choosing the picture of candidate against empty box.These battle in the beginning seems not fair because of political intention, empty box has no resources to compete with candidate. But, in the local election 2018, in some regions, empty box success to gain more voters than his rival. Winning of empty box in contestation of democracy became a proof that people feel tired because the system of regeneration in political parties not running well, other proof that single candidate that bring up by all political parties not always supported by voters. In the Indonesia constitutional law, the phenomenon of empty box surely implicate tomany problems. This writing will try to see this phenomenon and its implication according to Indonesian constitutional law.
One of the goals of the formation of the omnibus law is to increase the index of ease of doing business in Indonesia, which is currently far behind other countries. One effort that was then carried out by the government was to cut down a number of permits, one of which was an environmental permit, namely the obligation to complete EIA and UKL-UPL documents. However, this regulation is actually contradictory to the spirit of sustainable development (SDGs) which development must be in line with environmental protection. The action also has the potential to violate Article 28H paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution which requires the state to ensure the protection of citizens' constitutional rights to a clean and healthy environment. Especially in countries that have the highest business ease indexes, such as Denmark, South Korea and the United States, the issuance of EIA documents is mandatory and is carried out strictly. Therefore this article will try to look at the implications of the omnibus law for citizens' constitutional rights to a clean and healthy environment.
The development of the Corona Virus Disease-2019 (Covid-2019 was followed-up by the Government by issuing a Government Regulation in lieu of Law Number 1 of 2020 (Perpu Number 1 of 2020). The formulation of the problem to be answered in this research is what is the potential for legal irregularities in Government Regulation in lieu of Law Number 1 Year 2020? The research method used is normative juridical with a statutory approach. The results show that there is a potential for legal irregularities in this Perpu. The deviation in the form of a Perppu contradicts a number of Articles in the Legislation. These violations have the potential to give rise to legal uncertainty, because the Perpu is only temporary, namely until the completion of the Covid-19 pandemic outbreak phenomenon which cannot be ascertained when it will end. On the other hand, this Perpu provides enormous powers for a number of officials to take preventive measures that do not correlate directly with the Covid-19 pandemic problem, one of which is liquidity assistance to banks that are both systemically and non-systemically affected. In addition, all officials are given the right to immunity not to be prosecuted both criminal and civil and the decisions issued are not the object of the PTUN dispute, meaning that there is no checks and balances mechanism in the government. Thus, the suggestion given is to revise this Perpu.
Semakin tingginya angka penyebaran Corona Virus Disease 2019 (Covid-19) di Indonesia ditindaklanjuti oleh Pemerintah dengan mengeluarkan kebijakan baru yakni Pemberlakuan Pembatasan Kegiatan Masyarakat. Seperti halnya kebijakan-kebijakan lain, pemberlakuan kebijakan ini sekali pun dinilai efektif oleh Pemerintah selayaknya harus tetap sesuai dengan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku di Indonesia. Kebijakan PPKM merupakan salah satu kebijakan dalam upaya penanggulangan pandemi Covid-19 yang tidak mempunyai kedudukan hukum yang jelas, karena frase Pemberlakukan Pembatasan Kegiatan Untuk Pengendalian Penyebaran Wabah tidak terdapat dalam UU No. 6 Tahun 2018 tentang Kekarantinaan Kesehatan. Rumusan masalah yang hendak dijawab dalam artikel ini adalah bagaimana kedudukan hukum Pemberlakuan Pembatasan Kegiatan Masyarakat ini di dalam sistem ketatanegaraan Indonesia?. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan. Hasil penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa terdapat sejumlah peraturan berkaitan dengan PPKM tersebut yang cacat secara formil.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.