Patients implanted at a later age performed more poorly on AzBio sentences. A similar trend was noted with CNC scores although not significant. The variability in correlation coefficients and significance between both speech perception tests and AAI suggests that, as patients age, their performance on each individual test will be affected to a varying degree.

Objective To examine whether patients with isolated retropalatal collapse perform as well as others following implantation with an upper airway stimulation (UAS) device. Study Design Retrospective review. Setting Single-institution tertiary academic care medical center. Subjects and Methods Following drug-induced sleep endoscopy, subjects who met inclusion criteria for implantation with a UAS device received an implant per industry standard. Subjects with isolated retropalatal collapse were compared with those having other patterns of collapse. Outcome measures included apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and nadir oxyhemoglobin saturation (NOS). Results Ninety-one patients were implanted during the duration of the study, and 82 met inclusion criteria for analysis. Twenty-five had isolated retropalatal collapse, while the remaining 57 had other patterns of collapse on drug-induced sleep endoscopy. For all patients, mean preoperative AHI and NOS were 38.7 (95% CI, 35.0-42.4) and 78% (95% CI, 75%-80%), respectively; these improved postoperatively to 4.5 (95% CI, 2.3-6.6) and 91% (95% CI, 91%-92%). There was no significant preoperative difference between groups with regard to demographics, AHI, or NOS. Group comparison showed postoperative AHI to be 5.7 (95% CI, 0.57-10.8) for patients with isolated retropalatal collapse and 3.9 (95% CI, 1.7-6.1) for other patients (P = .888). Postoperative NOS was 92% (95% CI, 90%-94%) among patients with isolated retropalatal collapse and 91% (95% CI, 90%-92%) for others (P = .402). Conclusions All patients showed significant improvement following implantation with UAS. Patients with isolated retropalatal collapse showed similar improvement to other types of collapse with regard to AHI and NOS.

4. Laryngoscope, 2018.

4. Laryngoscope, 128:1486-1489, 2018.

Introduction: Over the last several decades, transoral resection techniques for treatment of supraglottic lesions have become increasingly favored to reduce the need for either open transcervical resection or primary chemoradiation. Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) offers advantages in visualization, dissection control, and access to remove bulky tumors en bloc. However, the management of the airway for these cases tends to vary, without clear guidelines as to when a tracheostomy is necessary.Materials and Methods: A retrospective review of all patients who underwent transoral robotic supraglottic partial laryngectomy at a large academic center from May 2005 through December 2016 was performed. Airway management was examined, specifically as it pertains to whether a tracheostomy was performed at the time of surgery or otherwise. Demographic and tumor characteristics were also evaluated.Results: Sixty-three patients were included. Forty (63%) were male, the average age at surgery was 63.6, and the majority (90.5%) underwent resection for squamous cell carcinoma of the supraglottis. Thirty-nine patients (62%) underwent the procedure with standard endotracheal intubation using a wire-reinforced tube. Of these, four patients required subsequent tracheostomy- 2 for laryngeal edema postoperatively, one for airway management during a postoperative bleeding event, and one for laryngeal edema following initiation of adjuvant chemoradiation. Twenty patients (32%) underwent tracheostomy at the time of transoral resection for airway management, 17 of whom were decannulated an average of 12.2 weeks following surgery. Those who underwent tracheostomy at the time of surgery had a higher percentage of tumors involving multiple supraglottic subsites (p = 0.031), 85 vs. 54% in the group who did not undergo tracheostomy. No difference in age, BMI, clinical T-stage, or clinical N stage was found between the two groups.Conclusion: Performing a tracheostomy at the time of surgery should be considered for those patients with more extensive malignant disease (≥T2 tumors). While avoiding tracheostomy is often preferred by the patient, the maintenance of the patent airway peri-operatively should be first priority when considering airway management. Furthermore, as the majority of those patients receiving tracheostomy are decannulated within 4 months of surgery, the tracheostomy could be considered a short-term adjunct to the procedure.