We investigated the effects of smoking-induced oxidative stress in healthy volunteers (21 smokers versus 24 non-smokers) by quantifying various markers of oxidative DNA damage and repair, and antioxidative defense mechanisms. Lymphocytic 7-hydroxy-8-oxo-2'-deoxyguanosine (8-oxo-dG) levels measured by high performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection, were significantly lower in smokers as compared with non-smokers (38.6 +/- 5.2 versus 50.9 +/- 4.6/10(6) dG, P = 0.05). The levels of oxidized pyrimidine bases in lymphocytes of smokers quantified by the endonuclease III-modified comet assay were non-significantly lower than those of non-smokers (% DNA in tail: 13 +/- 3 versus 14 +/- 2; tail length: 69 +/- 13 versus 96 +/- 10; tail moment: 6416 +/- 1220 versus 7545 +/- 1234). Urinary excretion levels of 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine (8-OH-dG) assessed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay did not differ significantly between smokers and non-smokers (197 +/- 31 versus 240 +/- 33 ng/body mass index, P = 0.3). Overall DNA repair activity expressed as unscheduled DNA synthesis in blood leukocytes, was not significantly different between smokers and non-smokers (2.9 +/- 0.3 versus 3.3 +/- 0.3, P = 0.4). Plasma antioxidative capacity measured by the Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity assay was slightly higher in smokers as compared with non-smokers (440 +/- 16 versus 400 +/- 15 microM Trolox equivalent, P = 0.09), and it was significantly related to lymphocytic 8-oxo-dG levels (r = 0.4, P = 0.001). Genotyping of human 8-OH-dG glycosylase/apurinic lyase and glutathione S-transferase M1 showed that a polymorphism in either or both of the two genes does not affect any of the quantified biomarkers. We conclude that oxidative stress imposed by cigarette smoking has a low impact upon certain pathways involved in DNA damage and the antioxidative defense system.

No abstract

We investigated the applicability of induced sputum (IS), a non-invasive derivative from the lower respiratory tract, for smoking-related DNA adduct analysis and its comparability with peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL). Lipophilic DNA adducts were quantified by the (32)P-post-labeling assay in IS and PBL of smokers (n = 9) with stable smoking status at three time points (one week intervals) and non-smokers (n = 9) at one time point. The success rate for sputum induction was 100% at all time points. There was no significant difference in total cell count, cell viability, squamous cell count and DNA yield between smokers and non-smokers. Within the smokers, there was no significant difference in IS cytology at the three time points: overall (mean of three measurements) total cell count, 9.0 +/- 2.4 x 10(6); cell viability, 77 +/- 4%; squamous cell count, 28 +/- 5%; non-squamous cell count, 72 +/- 4% (bronchoalveolar macrophages, 75 +/- 6%; neutrophils, 17 +/- 3%; bronchoepithelial cells, 7 +/- 2%; lymphocytes, 0.7 +/- 0.2%; metachromatic cells, 0.3 +/- 0.2%). IS DNA yield did not differ significantly at the three time points [overall (mean of three extractions) DNA yield, 66 +/- 20 microg]. A typical smoking-associated diagonal radioactive zone was observed in the adduct maps of IS and PBL of all and five smokers, respectively, and of none of the non-smokers. Lipophilic DNA adduct levels in both IS and PBL of smokers were higher than those of non-smokers (3.7 +/- 0. 9 versus 0.7 +/- 0.2/10(8) nt, P = 0.0005, and 2.1 +/- 0.3 versus 0. 6 +/- 0.1/10(8) nt, P = 0.0001, respectively). In smokers the level of adducts in IS was non-significantly higher than that in PBL (3.7 +/- 0.9 versus 2.1 +/- 0.3/10(8) nt, P = 0.1), whilst in non-smokers the difference was not appreciable (0.7 +/- 0.2 versus 0.6 +/- 0. 1/10(8) nt). Within the smokers there was no significant change in the level of adducts at the three time points either in IS or in PBL (coefficients of variation 34 and 29%, respectively). Adduct levels in IS at each time point were higher than those in PBL, leading to a significantly higher overall (mean of three quantifications) level of adducts in IS than PBL (3.3 +/- 0.2 versus 2.1 +/- 0.1/10(8) nt, P = 0.02). The overall levels of adducts in both IS and PBL were dose-dependently related to smoking indices. We conclude that IS is a preferable matrix as compared with PBL for molecular dosimetry of (current) exposure to inhalatory carcinogens as its analysis reveals both the existence and the magnitude of exposure more explicitly.

No abstract

No abstract