The identification of isomeric drugs is gaining increasing importance in forensics and doping control. Isomers vary in terms of safety, effectiveness, and regulation, particularly for amphetamine-related drugs (ARDs). This study developed and validated a pseudo-isocratic UPLC-qTOF-MS analytical method for the identification of isomeric Amphetamine-related drugs (ARDs) in blood following mixed-mode solid-phase extraction (MMSPE). The procedure requires 250 μL of blood to achieve a limit of quantification (LOQ) and detection (LOD) of 20 ng/mL for all analytes. In aged animal blood samples, extraction recoveries of 63–90% and matrix effects of 9–21% were observed. Precision and accuracy for all analytes were within 20% and 89–118%, respectively. The analytical method was developed and validated in accordance with the Scientific Working Group for Forensic Toxicology (SWGTOX) Standard. It has acceptable accuracy and precision for use in doping control and forensic toxicology.

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a heterogenous disease with a variable prognosis. The International Prognostic Index (IPI), revised-IPI (R-IPI), and National Comprehensive Cancer Network-IPI (NCCN-IPI) have been developed and validated to predict prognosis in DLBCL. However, patients from the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region were underrepresented in such scores, and it is unclear whether ethnic background contributes to different disease biology or response to therapy. Following due Institutional Board Review approval, DLBCL patients diagnosed from January 2010 until December 2015 from the MENA region were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 122 were identified and further analyzed. There were 74 males (61%), and the median age at diagnosis for the cohort was 64 years (range: 18-98 years), with a median follow-up duration of 32.9 months (range: 0.2-123.7 months). Estimates of three-year progression-free survival found a significant difference among risk groups using all three prognostic models but were more discriminating among the groups using NCCN-IPI and R-IPI vs. IPI (p = 0.019 and 0.014 vs. 0.039, respectively). For overall survival estimates at three years, the NCCN-IPI was the best model compared to R-IPI and IPI (p = 0.0013 vs. 0.05 and 0.04, respectively). In conclusion, we validated that the IPI and its subsequent iterations were predictive of outcome in DLBCL patients from the MENA region; however, the NCCN-IPI appeared the most prognostic. These results warrant further confirmation.

No abstract