Bagasse of Agave tequilana (BAT) is the residual lignocellulosic waste that remains from tequila production. In this study we characterized the chemical composition of BAT, which was further saccharified and fermented to produce ethanol. BAT was constituted by cellulose (42%), hemicellulose (20%), lignin (15%), and other (23%). Saccharification of BAT was carried out at 147 °C with 2% sulfuric acid for 15 min, yielding 25.8 g/l of fermentable sugars, corresponding to 36.1% of saccharificable material (cellulose and hemicellulose contents, w/w). The remaining lignocellulosic material was further hydrolyzed by commercial enzymes, ~8.2% of BAT load was incubated for 72 h at 40 °C rendering 41 g/l of fermentable sugars corresponding to 73.6% of the saccharificable material (w/w). Mathematic surface response analysis of the acid and enzymatic BAT hydrolysis was used for process optimization. The results showed a satisfactory correlation (R (2) = 0.90) between the obtained and predicted responses. The native yeast Pichia caribbica UM-5 was used to ferment sugar liquors from both acid and enzymatic hydrolysis to ethanol yielding 50 and 87%, respectively. The final optimized process generated 8.99 g ethanol/50 g of BAT, corresponding to an overall 56.75% of theoretical ethanol (w/w). Thus, BAT may be employed as a lignocellulosic raw material for bioethanol production and can contribute to BAT residue elimination from environment.
Bioethanol is among the most promising of biofuels because it has an energy content similar to gasoline while generating lower pollutant emissions than gasoline. But, in order to be used as an automotive fuel mixed with gasoline, ethanol must have less than 0.5 wt % of water. To achieve required ethanol purity, in light of the fact that the ethanolÀwater mixture forms an azeotrope, unconventional separation techniques such as extractive distillation or azeotropic distillation are necessary. However, the purification of ethanol using conventional distillation followed by extractive distillation has the disadvantage of high cost of services. Thus, this study proposes alternative hybrid systems using liquidÀliquid extraction and extractive distillation. The use of n-dodecane as entrainer for liquidÀliquid extraction and glycerol as entrainer for extractive distillation has been considered. The proposed systems are analyzed and a comparison is done on their performance in terms of energy and total annual cost. It has been found that the hybrid scheme presents both lower total energy consumption and lower total annual cost as compared to the traditional purification scheme with conventional distillation and extractive distillation.
This paper presents a systematic approach to identify the optimal pathway configurations of a biorefinery while incorporating technical, economic, and environmental objectives. This problem is formulated as a generalized disjunctive programming model which accounts for the simultaneous selection of products, feedstocks, and processing steps. The optimal solution can involve multiproduct and multifeedstock biorefineries. The optimization model takes into account two potentially conflicting objectives, the maximization of the net profit and the minimization of the greenhouse gas emissions, while considering the number of processing steps. The environmental criterion is measured using the life cycle assessment methodology. The εconstraint method is used to determine the Pareto curves of this multiobjective optimization problem and to show the trade-offs between the competing objectives. A case study is presented to illustrate the applicability of the proposed methodology for the optimal selection of the biorefinery configuration for the conditions of Mexico under several scenarios. The results show that the optimal combination of different feedstocks and products allows for proper trade-off between the economic and environmental objectives. Results also show that bioethanol, biodiesel, and biohydrogen usually appear as products, whereas sugar cane, jatropha, and microalgae appear as feedstocks in the optimal pathways.
BACKGROUND: Butanol produced from fermentation has attracted the interest of research groups because its physicochemical properties show several enhancements over bioethanol. Recent studies have proposed alternative methods to separate and purify biobutanol from a fermentation broth. These alternatives offer energy and economic savings; in addition, a reduction in environmental impact is observed. However few studies have analyzed the control properties of the process which involves separation of an acetone-butanol-ethanol (ABE) mixture.
Biofuels provide an attractive alternative for satisfying energy demands in a more sustainable way than fossil fuels. To establish a biorefinery, an optimal plan must be implemented for the entire associated supply chain, covering such aspects as selection of feedstocks, location, and capacity of biorefineries, selection of processing technologies, production amounts and transportation flows. In this context, there are several parameters, including the availability of biomass, product demand, and product prices, which are difficult to predict because they might change drastically over the different seasons of the year as well as across years. To address this challenge, this work presents a mathematical programming model for the optimal planning of a distributed system of biorefineries that considers explicitly the uncertainty associated with the supply chain operation as well as the associated risk. The potential of the proposed approach is demonstrated through its application to the production of biofuels in Mexico, considering multiple raw materials and products.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.