Cytokinins and ethylene control plant development via sensors from the histidine kinase (HK) family. However, downstream signaling pathways for the key phytohormones are distinct. Here we report that not only cytokinin but also ethylene is able to control root apical meristem (RAM) size through activation of the multistep phosphorelay (MSP) pathway. We found that both cytokinin and ethylene-dependent RAM shortening requires ethylene binding to ETR1 and the HK activity of ETR1. The receiver domain of ETR1 interacts with MSP signaling intermediates acting downstream of cytokinin receptors, further substantiating the role of ETR1 in MSP signaling. We revealed that both cytokinin and ethylene induce the MSP in similar and distinct cell types with ETR1-mediated ethylene signaling controlling MSP output specifically in the root transition zone. We identified members of the MSP pathway specific and common to both hormones and showed that ETR1-regulated ARR3 controls RAM size. ETR1-mediated MSP spatially differs from canonical CTR1/EIN2/ EIN3 ethylene signaling and is independent of EIN2, indicating that both pathways can be spatially and functionally separated. Furthermore, we demonstrated that canonical ethylene signaling controls MSP responsiveness to cytokinin specifically in the root transition zone, presumably via regulation of ARR10, one of the positive regulators of MSP signaling in Arabidopsis.
The multistep phosphorelay (MSP) is a central signaling pathway in plants integrating a wide spectrum of hormonal and environmental inputs and controlling numerous developmental adaptations. For the thorough comprehension of the molecular mechanisms underlying the MSP-mediated signal recognition and transduction, the detailed structural characterization of individual members of the pathway is critical. In this review we describe and discuss the recently known crystal and nuclear magnetic resonance structures of proteins acting in MSP signaling in higher plants, focusing particularly on cytokinin and ethylene signaling in Arabidopsis thaliana. We discuss the range of functional aspects of available structural information including determination of ligand specificity, activation of the receptor via its autophosphorylation, and downstream signal transduction through the phosphorelay. We compare the plant structures with their bacterial counterparts and show that although the overall similarity is high, the differences in structural details are frequent and functionally important. Finally, we discuss emerging knowledge on molecular recognition mechanisms in the MSP, and mention the latest findings regarding structural determinants of signaling specificity in the Arabidopsis MSP that could serve as a general model of this pathway in all higher plants.
Multistep phosphorelay (MSP) cascades mediate responses to a wide spectrum of stimuli, including plant hormonal signaling, but several aspects of MSP await elucidation. Here, we provide first insight into the key step of MSP-mediated phosphotransfer in a eukaryotic system, the phosphorylation of the receiver domain of the histidine kinase CYTOKININ-INDEPENDENT 1 (CKI1) from We observed that the crystal structures of free, Mg-bound, and beryllofluoridated CKI1 (a stable analogue of the labile phosphorylated form) were identical and similar to the active state of receiver domains of bacterial response regulators. However, the three CKI1 variants exhibited different conformational dynamics in solution. NMR studies revealed that Mg binding and beryllofluoridation alter the conformational equilibrium of the β3-α3 loop close to the phosphorylation site. Mutations that perturbed the conformational behavior of the β3-α3 loop while keeping the active-site aspartate intact resulted in suppression of CKI1 function. Mechanistically, homology modeling indicated that the β3-α3 loop directly interacts with the ATP-binding site of the CKI1 histidine kinase domain. The functional relevance of the conformational dynamics observed in the β3-α3 loop of CKI1 was supported by a comparison with another histidine kinase, ETR1. In contrast to the highly dynamic β3-α3 loop of CKI1, the corresponding loop of the ETR1 receiver domain (ETR1) exhibited little conformational exchange and adopted a different orientation in crystals. Biochemical data indicated that ETR1 is involved in phosphorylation-independent signaling, implying a direct link between conformational behavior and the ability of eukaryotic receiver domains to participate in MSP.
Plants, like other sessile organisms, need to sense many different signals, and in response to them, modify their developmental programs to be able to survive in a highly changing environment. The multistep phosphorelay (MSP) in plants is a good candidate for a response mechanism that integrates multiple signal types both environmental and intrinsic in origin. Recently, ethylene was shown to control MSP activity via the histidine kinase (HK) activity of ETHYLENE RESPONSE 1 (ETR1)1,2, but the underlying molecular mechanism still remains unclear. Here we show that although ETR1 is an active HK, its receiver domain (ETR1RD) is structurally and functionally unable to accept the phosphate from the phosphorylated His in the ETR1 HK domain (ETR1HK) to initiate the phosphorelay to ARABIDOPSIS HISTIDINE-CONTAINING PHOSPHOTRANSMITTERs (AHPs), the next link downstream members in MSP signaling. Instead, ETR1 interacts with another HK ARABIDOPSIS HISTIDINE KINASE 5 (AHK5) and transfers the phosphate from ETR1HK through the receiver domain of AHK5 (AHK5RD), and subsequently to AHP1, AHP2 and AHP3, independently of the HK activity of AHK5. We show that AHK5 is necessary for ethylene-initiated, but not cytokinin-initiated, MSP signaling in planta and that it thus mediates hormonal control of root growth.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.