IntroductionRecent studies have shown that the presence of systemic inflammation correlates with worse outcomes in many types of cancers. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) have been proposed as indicators of systemic inflammatory response. The aim of the study was to assess the prognostic value of NLR and PLR before starting chemotherapy among patients with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of medical documentation of 315 patients with newly diagnosed epithelial ovarian cancer, treated in Maria Skłodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, between 2007 and 2013. 31 (12.1%) patients had metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves for progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) prediction were plotted to verify cut-off points for NLR and PLR. PFS and OS were analysed for correlation with NLR and PLR, using the Cox regression model. Other potential prognostic variables included in multivariate analysis were: patient's age at diagnosis (<65 vs ≥65 years), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS) ≥2, FIGO stage of the disease and baseline Ca-125 level.ResultsIn multivariate analysis, higher pretreatment NLR (p=0.002), poor ECOG-PS (p=0.0002), higher disease stage (p<0.0001) and baseline Ca-125 (p=0.03) level were independent negative prognostic factors for PFS. However, only ECOG-PS ≥2 (p<0.0001), high stage of the disease (p<0.0001) and high baseline Ca-125 level (p=0.0003) were independent negative prognostic factors for OS.ConclusionsAdvanced stage of the disease with high Ca-125 level and poor patient performance status are the most important prognostic factors in ovarian cancer. Higher pretreatment value of NLR was an independent negative prognostic factor for PFS, with no significant impact on OS.
We retrospectively analyzed long-term disease outcome of 350 elderly Hodgkin Lymphoma (eHL) patients treated with ABVD/ABVD-like regimen enrolled in the PLRG-R9 study between 2001 and 2013 in Poland. Complete remission was reported for 73% of early (ES) and 61% advanced stage (AS) patients. Nine (10%) ES and 56 (20%) AS patients have died. With the median follow-up of 36 (1-190) months, 3-year EFS and OS was 0.74 (95%CI: 0.63-0.85) and 0.90 (95%CI: 0.82-0.98) for ES; 0.51 (95%CI: 0.44-0.57), and 0.81 (95%CI: 0.75-0.86) for AS patients, respectively. For ES patients, Cox regression revealed ECOG <2 and age >70 as predictive for inferior OS and EFS. For AS patients, the most predictive for OS was the presence of cardiovascular disorders (CVD) (p = .00044), while for EFS four factors were significantly associated with a poor outcome: ECOG< 2, age >70 years, CVD and extranodal disease. In conclusion, CVD significantly impacts outcomes of ABVD-treated advanced eHL patients.
Currently, breast cancer chemotherapy response can be predicted based on various parameters, with common reporting of tumour grade and Ki67 proliferation index. We analysed their association with pathological complete response (pCR) in a multivariate approach. The study was carried out in a group of 353 patients, treated by preoperative chemotherapy and prospectively observed. In selected patients, parallel to routing core needle biopsy assessment, gene expression profile of tumour was analysed by oligonucleotide microarrays. Tumour parameters associated with pCR in univariate analysis were: tumour grade, nuclear grade, mitotic index, Ki67, oestrogen and progesterone receptor (all p < 0.0001), and triple-negative status (p = 0.0032). The highest increase of pCR chance was observed in patients with high-grade tumours and with Ki67 ≥ 20%. In multivariate analysis, only tumour grade and oestrogen receptor status were predictive for pCR independently of other variables, with high grade increasing the odds of pCR 2.42 fold, and high ER decreasing the chance of pCR 0.41 fold. Tumour grading reflects important biological features of breast cancer and is not inferior to proliferation markers, including Ki67. It should be taken into account in decision-making for preoperative chemotherapy in parallel to breast cancer biologic subtypes, because grade 3 tumours exhibit a higher proportion of pCR.
Aim of the studyThe presence of BRCA germline mutations in patients with ovarian cancer has been shown to have predictive and prognostic significance, including increased platinum-sensitivity. The aim of the study was to evaluate if patients with BRCA1-associated ovarian cancer have more treatment related adverse events and, if so, does it have impact on chemotherapy outcomes.Material and methodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of medical records of 172 patients with newly diagnosed epithelial ovarian cancer, treated in Maria Skłodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch between 2007 and 2013. Ninety-six of these patients have known BRCA mutation status – 21 patients were BRCA1(+) and 75 BRCA1(–). Analysed treatment related adverse events (AE’s) were: haematological toxicity, nausea/vomiting, neuropathy and mucositis.ResultsGrade 3–4 haematological AE’s were significantly more common among BRCA1(+) patients (OR = 3.86; 95% CI: 1.14–13.23; p = 0.02). There was no association between BRCA1 mutation status and neuropathy (p = 0.73) or nausea/vomiting (p = 0.91). Occurrence of above mentioned AE’s has no significant association with PFS (p = 0.75, 0.64, 0.97 respectively) and OS (p = 0.64, 0.69, 0.73 respectively).ConclusionsAmong patients with BRCA1-associated epithelial ovarian cancer we observed significantly more grade 3–4 haematological complications after chemotherapy. However, occurrence of AE’s did not correlate with better outcomes in this subgroup.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.