Overall, we suggest that the EVOO-polar phenolic compounds decreased MDA and TNF-α in hearts of cholesterol-fed rats.

Extra virgin olive oil (EVOO) major and minor component anti-inflammatory effect on aorta was evaluated; Wistar rats were fed (9 weeks) on either a high-cholesterol diet (HCD) or a HCD supplemented with oils, i.e. EVOO, sunflower oil (SO), high-oleic sunflower oil (HOSO), or oil-products modified to their phenolic content, i.e. phenolics deprived-EVOO [EVOO(-)], SO enriched with the EVOO phenolics [SO(+)], HOSO enriched with the EVOO phenolics [HOSO(+)]. HCD induced dyslipidemia and resulted in higher aorta adhesion molecules levels at euthanasia. Groups receiving EVOO, EVOO(-), HOSO, HOSO(+) presented higher serum TC and LDL-c levels compared to cholesterol-fed rats; attenuation of aorta E-selectin levels was also observed. In EVOO/EVOO(-) groups, aorta vascular endothelial adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) was lower compared to HCD animals. SO/SO(+) diets had no effect on endothelial dysfunction amelioration. Overall, our results suggest that major and/or minor EVOO constituents improve aorta E-selectin and VCAM-1, while serum lipids do not benefit.

BackgroundThe protective potential of lazaroids has been reported in previous studies on ischemia/reperfusion and induced hemorrhagic shock protocols.ObjectivesThe present study is the first experimental protocol on the effects of the antioxidant factor U-74389G on the small intestine of swine models in a hemorrhagic shock protocol and resuscitation with 3 different types of fluids.MethodsThe study included 49 Landrace breed swine that were divided into groups of 7 each. Hemorrhage was provoked 45 minutes after starting the surgical protocol (0 minutes), followed by resuscitation starting 30 minutes after haemorrhage ceased by using 3 different fluids. Three groups (Group A, resuscitation using blood; Group B, resuscitation with Ringer’s lactate solution; and Group C, resuscitation with hypertonic saline solution) underwent resuscitation with fluid alone, and another 3 groups (named A', B,' and C') were administered lazaroid U-74389G in addition to fluid. Control Group S underwent all the surgical procedures without hemorrhagic shock. Vital signs, complete blood count, and biochemical markers were analyzed, and tissue samples of the small intestine were collected from all animals. Further, malondialdehyde, tumor necrosis factor-α, and levels of inflammation in the tissue sample were measured.ResultsIn Group S-A-A' and Group S-C-C', the analysis did not show statistically significant differences in the percentage changes of histopathology, malondialdehyde, and tumor necrosis factor-α through time. In Group S-B-B', the malondialdehyde levels in the small intestine were reduced in both the B and B' groups, without lazaroid (Group B) (P = 0.038) and lazaroid (Group B') (P = 0.011), compared with Group S (control), but the group without lazaroid (Group B) had greater reduction in malondialdehyde levels than the group treated with lazaroid (Group B'). With regard to the biochemistry results, 24% reduction was observed for alkaline phosphatase (P = 0.022) in Group A' treated with lazaroid compared with that in the untreated group. Lastly, for the complete blood count parameters, a 14% reduction in white blood cells was observed in Group B', which was treated with lazaroid in all phases (P = 0.015) (absolute value = 6.23) compared with Group B (absolute value = 13.74).ConclusionsDespite few initial findings of this study suggesting that administration of lazaroid U-74389G may have some potential in attenuation of the effects of hemorrhagic shock in the small intestine of swine models, no differences remained after correction for multiple comparisons was made. Therefore, further research is required to investigate this result thoroughly.

No abstract