published version features the final layout of the paper including the volume, issue and page numbers. Link to publication General rightsCopyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights.• Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal.If the publication is distributed under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the "Taverne" license above, please follow below link for the End User

In the k-Connectivity Augmentation Problem we are given a k-edge-connected graph and a set of additional edges called links. Our goal is to find a set of links of minimum size whose addition to the graph makes it (k + 1)-edge-connected. There is an approximation preserving reduction from the mentioned problem to the case k = 1 (a.k.a. the Tree Augmentation Problem or TAP) or k = 2 (a.k.a. the Cactus Augmentation Problem or CacAP). While several better-than-2 approximation algorithms are known for TAP, for CacAP only recently this barrier was breached (hence for k-Connectivity Augmentation in general). As a first step towards better approximation algorithms for CacAP, we consider the special case where the input cactus consists of a single cycle, the Cycle Augmentation Problem (CycAP). This apparently simple special case retains part of the hardness of the general case. In particular, we are able to show that it is APX-hard. In this paper we present a combinatorial $\left (\frac {3}{2}+\varepsilon \right )$ 3 2 + ε -approximation for CycAP, for any constant ε > 0. We also present an LP formulation with a matching integrality gap: this might be useful to address the general case of the problem.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

In the Demand Strip Packing problem (DSP), we are given a time interval and a collection of tasks, each characterized by a processing time and a demand for a given resource (such as electricity, computational power, etc.). A feasible solution consists of a schedule of the tasks within the mentioned time interval. Our goal is to minimize the peak resource consumption, i.e. the maximum total demand of tasks executed at any point in time.It is known that DSP is NP-hard to approximate below a factor 3/2, and standard techniques for related problems imply a (polynomial-time) 2-approximation. Our main result is a (5/3 + ε)approximation algorithm for any constant ε > 0. We also achieve best-possible approximation factors for some relevant special cases.

The basic goal of survivable network design is to build cheap networks that guarantee the connectivity of certain pairs of nodes despite the failure of a few edges or nodes. A celebrated result by Jain [Combinatorica'01] provides a 2-approximation for a wide class of these problems. However nothing better is known even for very basic special cases, raising the natural question whether any improved approximation factor is possible at all.In this paper we address one of the most basic problems in this family for which 2 is still the bestknown approximation factor, the Forest Augmentation Problem (FAP): given an undirected unweighted graph (that w.l.o.g. we can assume to be a forest) and a collection of extra edges (links), compute a minimum cardinality subset of links whose addition to the graph makes it 2-edge-connected. Several better-than-2 approximation algorithms are known for the special case where the input graph is a tree, a.k.a. the Tree Augmentation Problem (TAP), see e.g. [Grandoni, Kalaitzis, Zenklusen -STOC'18; Cecchetto, Traub, Zenklusen -STOC'21] and references therein. Recently this was achieved also for the weighted version of TAP [Traub,, and for the k-connectivity generalization of TAP [Byrka, Grandoni, Cecchetto, Traub,. These results heavily exploit the fact that the input graph is connected, a condition that does not hold in FAP.In this paper we breach the 2-approximation barrier for FAP. Our result is based on two main ingredients. First, we describe a reduction to the Path Augmentation Problem (PAP), the special case of FAP where the input graph is a collection of disjoint paths. Our reduction is not approximation preserving, however it is sufficiently accurate to improve on a factor 2 approximation. Second, we present a betterthan-2 approximation algorithm for PAP, an open problem on its own. Here we exploit a novel notion of implicit credits which might turn out to be helpful in future related work.

The basic goal of survivable network design is to build a cheap network that maintains the connectivity between given sets of nodes despite the failure of a few edges/nodes. The Connectivity Augmentation Problem (CAP) is arguably one of the most basic problems in this area: given a k(-edge)-connected graph G and a set of extra edges (links), select a minimum cardinality subset A of links such that adding A to G increases its edge connectivity to k + 1. Intuitively, one wants to make an existing network more reliable by augmenting it with extra edges. The best known approximation factor for this NP-hard problem is 2, and this can be achieved with multiple approaches (the first such result is in [Frederickson and Jájá'81]).It is known [Dinitz et al.'76] that CAP can be reduced to the case k = 1, a.k.a. the Tree Augmentation Problem (TAP), for odd k, and to the case k = 2, a.k.a. the Cactus Augmentation Problem (CacAP), for even k. Several better than 2 approximation algorithms are known for TAP, culminating with a recent 1.458 approximation [Grandoni et al.'18]. However, for CacAP the best known approximation is 2.In this paper we breach the 2 approximation barrier for CacAP, hence for CAP, by presenting a polynomial-time 2 ln(4) − 967 1120 + ε < 1.91 approximation. From a technical point of view, our approach deviates quite substantially from the current related literature. In particular, the better-than-2 approximation algorithms for TAP either exploit greedy-style algorithms or are based on rounding carefullydesigned LPs. These approaches exploit properties of TAP that do not seem to generalize to CacAP. We instead use a reduction to the Steiner tree problem which was previously used in parameterized algorithms [Basavaraju et al.'14]. This reduction is not approximation preserving, and using the current best approximation factor for Steiner tree [Byrka et al.'13] as a black-box would not be good enough to improve on 2. To achieve the latter goal, we "open the box" and exploit the specific properties of the instances of Steiner tree arising from CacAP.In our opinion this connection between approximation algorithms for survivable network design and Steiner-type problems is interesting, and it might lead to other results in the area.