In advanced renal cell carcinoma, few randomized controlled trials involving immunotherapy plus antiangiogenic therapy have shown survival benefits relative to Sunitinib. Our meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combined immunotherapy and antiangiogenic therapy compared to Sunitinib therapy alone in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. Six phase III randomized controlled trials were analyzed, including 4,119 patients. The primary endpoints were overall survival and progressionfree survival, and the secondary endpoints were objective response rate and serious adverse events. The results showed that combined immunotherapy and antiangiogenic therapy significantly improved overall survival, progression-free survival, and objective response rate compared to Sunitinib alone. No significant difference was observed in adverse events between the two groups. This study suggests that combined immunotherapy and antiangiogenic therapy is a great treatment option for advanced renal cell carcinoma.
Cyclic thrombocytopenia (CTP) is a very rare hematological disorder that is characterized by periodic fluctuations in platelet counts. Diagnosis is generally delayed due to its similarity with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). The pathophysiology is unknown and there are currently no guidelines for management. Many patients are usually treated for ITP initially prior to diagnosis. We describe a 67-year-old female with a history of multiple episodes of transient thrombocytopenia who presented to the hospital with another episode of thrombocytopenia. Her workup including HIV, hepatitis screening, vitamin B12, and folate was negative. She received a unit of platelet transfusion and was later observed in the hospital. Further review of her chart showed similar episodes in the past with spontaneous improvement. She was diagnosed with CTP. Her platelet count improved remarkably prior to discharge. In patients with recurrent fluctuation in their platelet count, CTP should be one of the differentials as this might prevent further unnecessary therapies.
e17060 Background: PARP inhibitors effectively treat several solid tumors, regardless of the presence of BRCA mutations. Patients with castration-resistant metastatic prostate cancer become refractory to androgen deprivation therapy. PARP inhibitors were recently approved for use in prostate cancer, and have opened new avenues in prostate cancer treatment research. Methods: We systematically searched multiple databases using pre-specified search terms. We included only phase III RCTs comparing PARP inhibitors versus standard of care in patients with castration-resistant biopsy-proven metastatic prostate cancer. The outcomes studied were radiologically guided progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). We used a random effects model via RevMan 5.4 software for statistical analysis. Results: 3 phase III RCTs met the inclusion criteria with a total of 1606 patients (PARP inhibitors = 867 patients, standard of care = 739 patients). Compared to the standard of care, PARP inhibitors showed significantly higher PFS [HR = 0.62( 95% CI, 0.49-0.78) P < 0.0001]. There was no statistically significant difference in OS [HR = 0.85( 95% CI, 0.69-0.1.04) P = 0.11] between the two groups. Conclusions: The use of PARP inhibitors in patients with castration-resistant metastatic prostate cancer is associated with improved progression-free survival. No significant difference was observed in overall survival between the two groups. There is a need to study the cost-benefit analysis of using PARP inhibitors as they do not show any improvement in overall survival. [Table: see text]
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.