Objectives-Financial toxicity is increasingly recognized as an adverse outcome of cancer treatment. Our objective was to measure financial toxicity among gynecologic oncology patients and its association with demographic and disease-related characteristics; self-reported overall health; and cost-coping strategies. Methods-Follow-up patients at a gynecologic oncology practice completed a survey including the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST) tool and a self-reported overall health assessment, the EQ-VAS. We abstracted disease and treatment characteristics from medical records. We dichotomized COST scores into low and high financial toxicity and assessed the correlation (r) between COST scores and self-reported health. We calculated risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the associations of demographic and disease-related characteristics with high financial toxicity, as well as the associations between high financial toxicity and cost-coping strategies.
Colposcopy following positive high-risk human papillomavirus testing maintained sensitivity and improved positive predictive value of high-grade cervical dysplasia among women living with human immunodeficiency virus.
Objective Evaluate 1-year outcomes of cervical cancer screening and treatment using primary high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) testing in women living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).Design Prospective cohort study.Setting HIV treatment centre in Botswana.Population Women living with HIV.Methods Participants underwent cervical cancer screening with high-risk HPV testing and triage evaluation at baseline and 1-year follow up. Excisional treatment was offered as indicated. Histopathology was the reference standard.Main outcome measures Persistence, clearance and incidence of high-risk HPV infection; and persistence, progression, regression, cure and incidence of cervical dysplasia.Results Among 300 women screened at baseline, 237 attended follow up (79%). High-risk HPV positivity significantly decreased from 28% at baseline to 20% at 1 year (P = 0.02). High-risk HPV persistence was 46% and clearance was 54%; incidence was high at 9%. Prevalence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia Grade 2 (CIN2) or higher was most common in participants with incident high-risk HPV (53%). CIN2 or higher was also common in those with persistent high-risk HPV (32%) and even in those who cleared high-risk HPV (30%). Of the high-risk HPV-positive participants at baseline with
Objective(s)
Most surgeons recommend restriction of activities after minimally invasive gynecologic and pelvic reconstructive surgery. The goal of this study was to identify and assess the postoperative guidelines gynecologists and urogynecologists provide their patients.
Methods
This was a cross-sectional study of physicians at a national gynecology conference in March 2018. Respondents were asked to answer questions about the typical postoperative recommendations they provide patients after gynecologic surgery as well as their postoperative prescribing habits.
Results
There were 418 attendees, and 135 (32%) eligible physicians completed the survey. Of respondents, 87% were specialists in female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery. Most respondents (61%) were in academic practice. Most respondents (82%–86%) recommended specific postoperative lifting restrictions, and 49% to 52% recommended limiting lifting to a maximum of 10 lb after surgery with some variation depending on the surgical procedure performed. Many respondents (42%–56% depending on the surgical procedure) recommended that patients wait at least 2 weeks before returning to sedentary work. Male respondents and those who were in practice for more than 10 years recommended that patients return to work sooner compared with those who were in practice less than 10 years. Male respondents prescribed fewer opioids to patients after vaginal hysterectomy (P = 0.04) and vaginal prolapse repair (P = 0.03) compared with female respondents.
Conclusions
After minimally invasive gynecologic or pelvic reconstructive surgery, providers recommend a wide range of postoperative restrictions and prescribe significantly different quantities of opioids during the postoperative period. This study highlights some of the recommendations with the greatest variability.
Objectives
The objective of this study was to determine the impact of a multimodal protocol on opiate use and postoperative pain after ambulatory urogynecologic surgery.
Methods
This was a retrospective cohort study comparing ambulatory urogynecologic surgery patients treated under a standard perioperative pain protocol with those treated under a multimodal perioperative pain protocol. The multimodal protocol consisted of preoperative gabapentin and acetaminophen and postoperative scheduled doses of acetaminophen and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Pain scores were obtained from nursing records and assessed on the Numeric Rating Scale 11 per hospital protocol. All opioid dosages were converted into morphine milligram equivalents using standardized conversion tables.
Results
We treated 109 patients under the standard protocol and 112 under the multimodal protocol. Patients had similar baseline characteristics. Overall, a minority of patients (39%) used postoperative opioids; this was similar in the 2 groups (P=0.45). The 2 groups also were similar with regard to the total postoperative morphine milligram equivalents (P=0.35). Postoperatively, patients treated under the standard protocol had higher mean pain scores (2.2 vs 1.4, P=0.002). Patients treated under the standard protocol were also significantly more likely to report postoperative pain (69%) than those treated under the multimodal protocol (52%; P=0.01), and the multimodal protocol was associated with a 25% lower risk of postoperative pain (risk ratio, 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.60–0.94) than the standard protocol.
Conclusions
Patients infrequently use opiates after ambulatory urogynecologic surgery. The use of a multimodal pain protocol was associated with lower pain scores, and patients in a multimodal pain protocol were more likely to report no pain.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.