Numerous methods have been proposed to estimate the indentation fracture toughness Kic for brittle materials. These methods generally uses formulae established from empirical correlations between critical applied force, or average crack length, and classical fracture mechanics tests. This study compares several models of fracture toughness calculation obtained by using Vickers indenters. Two optical glasses (Crown and Flint), one vitroceramic (Zerodur) and one ceramic (hydroxyapatite) are tested. Fracture toughness and hardness are obtained by using instrumented Vickers indentation at micrometer scale. Young's moduli are obtained by instrumented Berkovich indentation at nanometer scale. Fracture toughness is calculated with models involving crack length measurements, and by models free of crack length measurements by considering critical force, chipping, pop-in. Finally, method based on the cracking energy, commonly employed for coated materials is also used. The aim of this work is to compare seven methods, which enable the facture toughness determination, on four brittle materials. To do so, it was necessary to determine some specific constant in the case of Vickers tip use. On the one hand, results show that methods using crack length, critical force, edge chipping or pop-in lead to comparable results, and the advantages and drawbacks are highlighted. On the other hand, the indentation energy method leads to underestimated results of about 20%.

is an open access repository that collects the work of Arts et Métiers ParisTech researchers and makes it freely available over the web where possible. Quantitative EPMA analysis carried out on the coated sample cross-section coupled with nanoindentation techniques allowed the identification of the coated system architecture as composed of 4 main layers, with distinct mechanical properties, on top of the aluminium substrate: DLC (a:C-H chromium dopped layer and graded layer of CrC), a newly formed graded layer of CNiPCr, product of the interdifusion during PVD processing, and the NiP coating. The change in the elastic modulus with penetration depth was described by means of an original approach that was developed for its specific application to multilayer coatings.

The roughness of polymer surfaces is often investigated to guarantee both the surface integrity and the surface functionality. One of the major problems in roughness measurement analyses consists in determining both the evaluation length and the reference line (i.e., the degree of the polynomial equation) from which roughness parameters are computed. This article outlines an original generic method based on the generalized analysis of variance and experimental design methodology for estimating the most relevant roughness parameter p, the most pertinent scale, s, and finally, the degree of the polynomial fitting, d. This methodology is then applied to characterize the influence of four process parameters on the final roughness of poly(polypropylene) samples obtained by injection molding. This method allows us to determine the most efficient triplet (p, s, d) that best discriminates the effect of a process parameter q. It is shown that different (p, s, d) values are affected to each process parameter giving finally the scale on which each process parameter modifies the roughness of a polymeric surface obtained by injection molding. POLYM. ENG.