A Web-enabled survey was conducted to improve knowledge of home refrigeration practices of French consumers (n = 809), with an emphasis on hygiene, and this information was used to establish recommendations. The survey targeted a convenience sample of working people. Analysis of the survey responses revealed that efforts should be directed toward improvement of microbiological control measures. Only 37% of respondents made sure the temperature in their refrigerator was 4 degrees C or below. Only 37% of respondents reported that they systematically wrapped food. Sponges, known to be frequently highly contaminated, were used by 89% of the respondents to clean their refrigerator, which indicates the need to recommend disinfection of sponges before they are used for cleaning. Twenty-seven percent of respondents used sodium hypochlorite (bleach), but it was applied without previous cleaning (21% of the users) or in the commercial concentrated form (7% of the users). The permanent presence of water condensation on the shelves was noted by 2% of respondents, suggesting imperfect closure of the door, with a consequence of higher energy consumption and water available for microbial circulation and growth. Thus, an important recommendation is to check the door gaskets and to ensure the tight closure of the door. Seventy percent of the respondents declared that they never put warm or hot food in the refrigerator. However, many people, when orally questioned, acknowledged that they leave dishes at ambient temperature overnight before putting them in the refrigerator. It therefore is essential to recommend that perishable food not be left for more than 2 h at ambient temperature.

Staphylococcal food poisoning outbreaks are a major cause of foodborne illnesses in Europe and their notifications have been mandatory since 2005. Even though the European regulation on microbiological criteria for food defines a criterion on staphylococcal enterotoxin (SE) only in cheese and dairy products, European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) data reported that various types of food matrices are involved in staphylococcal food poisoning outbreaks. The European Screening Method (ESM) of European Union Reference Laboratory for Coagulase Positive Staphylococci (EURL CPS) was validated in 2011 for SE detection in food matrices and is currently the official method used for screening purposes in Europe. In this context, EURLCPS is annually organizing Inter-Laboratory Proficiency Testing Trials (ILPT) to evaluate the competency of the European countries’ National Reference Laboratories (NRLs) to analyse SE content in food matrices. A total of 31 NRLs representing 93% of European countries participated in these ILPTs. Eight food matrices were used for ILPT over the period 2013–2015, including cheese, freeze-dried cheese, tuna, mackerel, roasted chicken, ready-to-eat food, milk, and pastry. Food samples were spiked with four SE types (i.e., SEA, SEC, SED, and SEE) at various concentrations. Homogeneity and stability studies showed that ILPT samples were both homogeneous and stable. The analysis of results obtained by participants for a total of 155 blank and 620 contaminated samples allowed for evaluation of trueness (>98%) and specificity (100%) of ESM. Further to the validation study of ESM carried out in 2011, these three ILPTs allowed for the assessment of the proficiency of the NRL network and the performance of ESM on a large variety of food matrices and samples. The ILPT design presented here will be helpful for the organization of ILPT on SE detection by NRLs or other expert laboratories.

Aim:  To compare techniques for assessing biofilm populations previously subjected, or not, to inimical treatment by chlorine or drying. Methods and Results:  Four sonication treatments and swabbing were compared on Salmonella Typhimurium or Pseudomonas fluorescens biofilms grown on polyvinyl chloride (PVC). The apparatuses emitting the highest ultrasound energy were the most efficient except on Salm. Typhimurium biofilms subjected to drying: a lethal effect, leading to an underestimation of at least 1·5 log (CFU cm–2) was observed with the more aggressive treatment. The differences between the highest count and the swabbing counts ranged from 0·3 log (CFU cm–2) (untreated Salm. Typhimurium) to 1·7 log (CFU cm–2) (chlorine treated Ps. fluorescens). Impedance measurements, used to assess populations without detaching any cells showed that the calibration curves that were built up from data obtained with suspended cells plus PVC slides were not appropriate. Conclusions:  High energy ultrasound techniques designed either for in vitro or in situ studies proved efficient in assessing the number of attached CFU. However, the right treatment duration has to be carefully established before using high energy ultrasound techniques. Significance and impact of the study:  The effectiveness of a cleaning and disinfection regime inferred from data obtained after swabbing may be greatly underestimated.

The European Union Reference Laboratory for Listeria monocytogenes (EURL for L. monocytogenes) coordinates a European network of 29 National Reference Laboratories (NRLs). Depending on a national decision, NRLs undertake food, environmental, and veterinary L. monocytogenes strain surveillance in their respective countries. In the framework of the PulseNet Europe network, two pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) subtyping proficiency testing (PT) trials were carried out in 2003 and 2006. The obtained data showed that PFGE profiles can be compared and exchanged between laboratories. However, no further PT trial had been performed since 2006. In this context, two PT trials were organized by the EURL to evaluate the ability of NRLs to perform conventional serotyping, molecular serotyping and PFGE subtyping. Eleven well-characterized isolates of L. monocytogenes were used: six and nine isolates were tested in 2009 and 2010, respectively. Three isolates were repeated between the two studies. In the 2010 panel, a strain was tested in duplicate, and two strains were related to the same epidemiological group. The strains were analyzed blind in different laboratories (17 in 2009 and 25 in 2010) using (1) their own in-house method for serotyping methods and (2) standardized protocols based on the PulseNet protocol for PFGE. For conventional serotyping, 86.0% in 2009 and 91.0% in 2010 of the serotypes obtained were in agreement with the EURL data. For molecular serotyping, 93.5% of the results in 2009 and 95.2% in 2010 matched the EURL data. For PFGE, 68.9% in 2009 and 81.7% of the combined AscI/ApaI profiles were indistinguishable from the EURL reference profiles. The variations observed could be attributed to slight standardization defaults or, in a few cases, to a failure in DNA extraction. These PT trials provided a valuable opportunity to improve the subtyping ability of NRLs and facilitate exchanges of subtyping data in the future.

The European Union Reference Laboratory for Listeria monocytogenes (EURL for Lm) coordinates a European network of 35 National Reference Laboratories (NRLs), most of which perform food, environmental, and veterinary Lm strain surveillance in their respective countries. The EURL activities resulted in the recent creation of a database (EURL Lm DB). Typing and related epidemiological data submitted to the EURL Lm DB will be collected and shared by all the NRLs. For a given NRL, the only criterion required in order to submit pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) profiles to the database was the successful participation with at least one EURL PFGE and PFGE profile interpretation Proficiency Testing (PT) trial. In this context, the EURL organized a PT trial in 2012 to evaluate the NRL's ability to perform PFGE and profile interpretation. A total of 18 NRLs took part in this study. Upon request from the Food- and Waterborne Diseases and Zoonoses Programme of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, 10 National Public Health Reference Laboratories (NPHLs) also took part in this PT trial. Of the 28 participating laboratories, 16 obtained results classified as "good" or "satisfactory." These 16 laboratories included 10 NRLs (56%) and 6 NPHLs (60%). Of the 22 NRLs and NHPLs that participated in the part of the PT trial related to PFGE profile interpretation, 11 laboratories obtained good results. These 11 laboratories included eight NRLs, which therefore can now submit profiles to the EURL Lm DB. This PT trial provided a valuable opportunity to facilitate and to stimulate the sharing of reproducible PFGE profiles between human and food reference laboratories.