Gestation is a challenge to haemostasis and it is associated with significant haemostatic changes. Several studies have evaluated von Willebrand factor in normal pregnancy, but none considered the personal history of bleeding. We studied a group of healthy non-bleeding women (184 pregnant, 64 puerperium, 37 non-pregnant) to evaluate normal ranges and their relationship to blood group and parity. The von Willebrand factor increased markedly from non-pregnant values up to the end of early puerperium (P < 0.0001), while factor VIII only showed a slight increase. Factor VIII and von Willebrand factor activity remained within the normal range for non-pregnant women. The return to non-pregnant factor levels occurred in late puerperium, later than previously reported. Only factor VIII was significantly lower in the O blood group (P = 0.035). As regards parity, there were no differences in factor VIII, von Willebrand factor antigen and von Willebrand factor ristocetin cofactor between primigravidae and multigravidae for any period studied (P = 0.888, 0.999, and 0.237, respectively). Our results provide reference ranges that may help to design a study in von Willebrand factor disease in pregnancy.

A b s t r a c tWe developed a new method for the detection of large von Willebrand factor (vWf) Von Willebrand Factor (vWf) is a glycoprotein that is synthesized by megakaryocytes and endothelial cells. It is found in plasma, subendothelial matrix, and platelets. The smallest form, a 500-kd dimer, is polymerized to more than 20 multimers of different sizes; the largest can reach a molecular weight of more than 15,000 kd.

von Willebrand disease is the most common inherited bleeding disorder in humans. VWD can be classified into three major types, designated Types 1, 2 and 3; Type 2 can be further separated into subtypes 2A, 2B, 2M and 2N. The diagnosis of VWD requires a personal and family history of bleeding and confirmation by laboratory analysis. Although Types 2 and 3 are relatively straightforward to diagnose, there may be a risk of overdiagnosis of Type 1 because of an overlap within the normal range. We also report on the clinical profile and diagnosis of VWD in a South American cohort of patients and on the in vitro characteristics of some factor concentrates available for treatment of VWD.

No abstract

Summary In this paper, the recent developments in the diagnosis and laboratory issues of von Willebrand’s disease (VWD) are presented. Dr. Castaman reviews the functional tests available for the diagnosis of VWD and their pathophysiological significance, focusing on which tests are best used in the diagnosis and classification of VWD. Dr Montgomery reviews an emerging issue that is accelerated clearance of von Willebrand factor (VWF) occurring in some variants of VWD. This phenotype can be suspected by the presence of an increased ratio between the VWF propeptide and the VWF antigen. These patients have typically a robust, but short-lived increase of FVIII and VWF after desmopressin. Dr Meschengieser reviews the determinants of bleeding after surgery in patients with VWD, emphasizing the role of bleeding history in predicting this risk.

Platelet-type von Willebrand disease (PT-VWD) and type 2B von Willebrand disease (2B-VWD) are rare bleeding disorders characterized by increased ristocetin-induced platelet aggregation (RIPA) at low concentrations of ristocetin. Diagnosis of either condition is not easy and the differential diagnosis between the two entities is especially challenging as evidenced by high levels of misdiagnosis of both conditions, but particularly PT-VWD. Five mutations in the GP1BA gene related to PT-VWD and less than 50 patients are currently reported worldwide. We herein describe a patient with severe bleeding symptoms, macrothrombocytopenia, mild spontaneous platelet aggregation, positive RIPA at 0.3 and 0.4 mg/mL, von Willebrand factor ristocetin cofactor (VWF:RCo) to antigen (VWF:Ag) < 0.2, normal VWF propeptide/VWF:Ag ratio, and RIPA mixing tests and cryoprecipitate challenge positive for PT-VWD. GP1BA gene was studied in the patient, in his mother, and in 100 healthy control subjects. We identified a heterozygous substitution G > T located at nucleotide 3805 in the g.DNA of the patient's GP1BA gene, resulting in a Trp to Leu amino acid change at residue 246 (p.W246L). This mutation was absent in his unaffected mother and also in the 100 controls, and was predicted as damaging by in silico analysis. The residue W246 is located within the VWF-binding region and exists in a strongly conserved position in the phylogenetic tree, which is expected to be unable to tolerate substitutions without changing its functional characteristics. These findings argue strongly in favor of the view that this substitution does not represent a polymorphism and is therefore responsible for the PT-VWD phenotype of the patient.

The von Willebrand factor (VWF) is analysed as a bleeding and thrombotic risk marker. When the VWF level is increased, it predicts a thrombotic phenotype and when VWF level is low in plasma, the phenotype varies to bleeding disorder. But it is quite challenging to define when the level is low, normal or high taking into account that these values are capricious and overlap. This matter should be solved by extensive epidemiologic studies. VWD is a hereditary disorder with several described mutations. VWF is a major acute-phase reactant, besides the physiological conditions such as blood group and pregnancy that affect plasmatic VWF levels. Subjects with O blood group have 25% less VWF than those of non O blood groups, and the latter show higher thrombus burden. VWF would be sensitive though not specific diagnostic marker of myocardial infarction. For the assessment of bleeding severity there are special surveys, scores and pictorial charts. The identification of VWF as a thrombotic risk marker has not been clearly established yet, but it has been involved in stroke and coronary disease. We only have the specific replacement therapy for the bleeding phenotype and we can speculate that enoxaparin and PEG-hirudin are able to blunt the VWF rise in patients with unstable angina pectoris and it is associated with a more favourable clinical outcome. Only two questions remain: does VWF as a bleeding risk marker have the same value as a thrombotic risk marker? Will successful treatments like those achieved for bleeding be also possible in the future for thrombosis?

No abstract