No abstract

Ultrasensitive methods for rare allele detection are critical to leverage the full potential offered by liquid biopsies. Here, we describe a novel molecular barcoding method for the precise detection and quantification of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). The major benefits of our design include straightforward and cost-effective production of barcoded adapters to tag individual DNA molecules before PCR and sequencing, and better control over cross-contamination between experiments. We validated our approach in a cohort of 24 patients with a broad spectrum of cancer diagnoses by targeting and quantifying single-nucleotide variants (SNVs), indels and genomic rearrangements in plasma samples. By using personalized panels targeting a priori known mutations, we demonstrate comprehensive error-suppression capabilities for SNVs and detection thresholds for ctDNA below 0.1%. We also show that our semi-degenerate barcoded adapters hold promise for noninvasive genotyping in the absence of tumor biopsies and monitoring of minimal residual disease in longitudinal plasma samples. The benefits demonstrated here include broad applicability, flexibility, affordability and reproducibility in the research and clinical settings.

594 Background: TNBC, the most aggressive form of breast cancer, is treated primarily with chemotherapy, even before surgery (neoadjuvant chemotherapy or NAC). The prognosis and need for adjuvant therapy depends greatly on the tumor response assessed by pathology (pCR). Highly sensitive and specific ctDNA assays have been shown to be of prognostic value in the metastatic settingbut not yet in earlier settings. Methods: Tissue was collected from 26 Q-CROC-03 clinical trial TNBC patients before, during and after NAC, prior to surgery. Whole exome sequencing on tumor tissues was used to select single nucleotide variants with high allele frequency (VAF), prioritizing TP53, to generateindividual digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) assays. An average of 5 variants (range 1-12) per patient were tested, for a total of 121 variants. A detection threshold was defined for each variant from a pool of normal controls. Median follow-up was 55 months. Results: ctDNA was detectable in 96% of patients at baseline, but 20% of the 121 variants were not detectable at any time point. At baseline, the mean VAF of all analyzed variants, but not of TP53 variants alone, was significantly correlated (p < 0.05) with tumor factors (tumor size, stage, grade, nodal status before and at surgery, RCB score) but not with patient age or BRCA1/2 mutation status. 87 variants (74%) were detected at baseline and their VAF fell by 86% after 1 cycle of chemotherapy (T1). The detection of ctDNA at T1 was associated with DFS (p = 0.027) while the detection of ctDNA at the last post-chemotherapy pre-surgery time point (T4) was strongly associated with pathological complete response (pCR) and both DFS (p = 0.013) and OS(p = 0.006). At this time point, 5 of 41 variants (12%) were detected in pCR patients vs 42 of 80 (53%) in non-pCR, while only 6 of the 15 (40%) non-pCR patients had detectable TP53 variants. Interestingly, for variants detected at baseline, the positive predictive value of T4 ctDNA for disease recurrence was 69%, similar to that of non-pCR, while the negative predictive value of no ctDNA at T4 was 89% for disease recurrence vs 80% for pCR. Conclusions: ctDNA detection after NAC prior to surgery is strongly predictive of disease-free survival and overall survival and is comparable to pCR as a prognostic factor in our cohort (NCT01276899).

The outcome of the process of cloning by nuclear transfer depends on multiple factors that affect its efficiency. Donor cells should be carefully selected for their use in somatic nuclear transfer, and the protocols used for keeping frozen cell banks are of cardinal importance. Here we studied the effect of two protocols for freezing donor cells on fusion rate and development into blastocysts. Our hypothesis is that freezing affects cell membranes in a way that interferes with the fusion process upon cloning but without hampering normal cell development in vitro. We found that freezing cell lines without controlling the cooling rate gives lower yields in the fusion step and in the final development into blastocysts, compared with cells frozen with a controlled cooling rate of approximately 1 degrees C/min. Transmission electron microscopy of the cells subjected to different freezing procedures showed major damage to the cells frozen with a non-controlled protocol. We conclude that freezing of donor cells for cloning is a critical step in the procedure and should be monitored carefully using a method that allows for a step-wise, controlled cooling rate.