An enantioselective synthesis of cyclopentenediones bearing a pyrazole unit has been achieved through an organocatalytic Michael addition/oxidation process. This desymmetrization reaction led to the desired pyrazole-cyclopentenediones with high yield and good enantioselectivities. The postulated cross-dehydrogenative coupling-mechanism has been investigated via preliminary control experiments.
Silicon, as potential next‐generation anode material for high‐energy lithium‐ion batteries (LIBs), suffers from substantial volume changes during (dis)charging, resulting in continuous breakage and (re‐)formation of the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI), as well as from consumption of electrolyte and active lithium, which negatively impacts long‐term performance and prevents silicon‐rich anodes from practical application. In this work, fluorinated phosphazene compounds are investigated as electrolyte additives concerning their SEI‐forming ability for boosting the performance of silicon oxide (SiOx)‐based LIB cells. In detail, the electrochemical performance of NCM523 || SiOx/C pouch cells is studied, in combination with analyses regarding gas evolution properties, post‐mortem morphological changes of the anode electrode and the SEI, as well as possible electrolyte degradation. Introducing the dual‐additive approach in state‐of‐the‐art electrolytes leads to synergistic effects between fluoroethylene carbonate and hexafluorocyclotriphosphazene‐derivatives (HFPN), as well as enhanced electrochemical performance. The formation of a more effective SEI and increased electrolyte stabilization improves lifetime and results in an overall lower cell impedance. Furthermore, gas chromatography‐mass spectrometry measurements of the aged electrolyte with HFPN‐derivatives as an additive compound show suppressed ethylene carbonate and ethyl methyl carbonate decomposition, as well as reduced trans‐esterification and oligomerization products in the aged electrolyte.
In recent years, lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) are widely used in electric vehicles (EVs) and mobile energy storage devices (ESDs), which has led to higher requirements for energy density. To fulfill these requirements, tremendous attention has been paid to design advanced LIBs with various silicon active materials as alternative negative electrodes to replace graphite (372 mAh g-1) due to their high theoretical gravimetric capacity (4200 mA h g-1).[1,2] However, silicon as potential anode material suffers from huge volume changes during charging and discharging and has a poor electronic conductivity which negatively impacts the long-term performance and prevents high silicon contents from practical application.[3] Additionally, an unstable crystalline silicon structure tends to pulverization during the (de)lithiation process.[4] To compensate the volume changes, alleviate pulverization and maintain high electronic conductivity, silicon-doped graphite composites with protecting coating layers are a promising approach. In this context, phosphazene compounds are investigated concerning their silicon protecting properties in silicon-doped graphite composites. In detail electrochemical performance measurements in pouch full-cells (NCM523||SiOx/C), supressing gas formation properties and post-mortem analyzes were carried out to characterize phosphazene compounds as additive materials. The introduction of the dual-additive approach in state-of-the-art electrolytes leads to synergistic effects between FEC and phosphazene compounds which accelerate the durability of silicon particles and results in enhanced electrochemical performance. Reference: [1]Zuo X, Zhu J, Muller‐Buschbaum P, Cheng Y, Silicon based lithium‐ion battery anodes: a chronicle perspective review, Nano Energy, 2017, 31, 113‐143. [2]Jimenez A. R., Klöpsch R., Wagner R., Rodehorst U. C., Kolek M., Nölle R., Winter M., Placke T., A step toward high-energy silicon-based thin film lithium ion batteries, ACS Nano, 2017, 11, 5, 4731-4744. [3] Berla A. L., Lee S. W., Ryu I., Cui Y., Nix W. D., Robustness of amorphous silicon during the initial lithiation/delithiation cycle, Journal of power sources, 2014, 258, 253-259. [4] Casimir A., Zhang H., Ogoke O., Amine J. C., Lu J., Wu G., Silicon-based anodes for lithium-ion batteries: Effectiveness of materials synthesis and electrode preparation, Nano Energy, 2016, 27, 359-376.
Effective electrolyte compositions are of primary importance in raising the performance of lithium‐ion batteries (LIBs). Recently, fluorinated cyclic phosphazenes in combination with fluoroethylene carbonate (FEC) have been introduced as promising electrolyte additives, which can decompose to form an effective dense, uniform, and thin protective layer on the surface of electrodes. Although the basic electrochemical aspects of cyclic fluorinated phosphazenes combined with FEC were introduced, it is still unclear how these two compounds interact constructively during operation. This study investigates the complementary effect of FEC and ethoxy(pentafluoro)cyclotriphosphazene (EtPFPN) in aprotic organic electrolyte in LiNi0.5Co0.2Mn0.3O ∥ SiOx/C full cells. The formation mechanism of lithium ethyl methyl carbonate (LEMC)‐EtPFPN interphasial intermediate products and the reaction mechanism of lithium alkoxide with EtPFPN are proposed and supported by Density Functional Theory calculations. A novel property of FEC is also discussed here, called molecular‐cling‐effect (MCE). To the best knowledge, the MCE has not been reported in the literature, although FEC belongs to one of the most investigated electrolyte additives. The beneficial MCE of FEC toward the sub‐sufficient solid‐electrolyte interphase forming additive compound EtPFPN is investigated via gas chromatography‐mass spectrometry, gas chromatography high resolution‐accurate mass spectrometry, in situ shell‐isolated nanoparticle‐enhanced Raman spectroscopy, and scanning electron microscopy.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.