Based on questionnaire data, 989 subjects were classified into one of the following four groups: (1) high-load, many symptoms; (2) high-load, few symptoms; (3) low-load, many symptoms; and (4) low-load, few symptoms. Using an ANOVA design (with 'psychosocial load' and 'symptoms' as independent variables) the coping styles of these four groups were studied. In spite of substantial differences in coping between males and females, the pattern of findings was very similar for both sexes. The factor 'psychosocial load' yielded significant results for distancing and for positive thinking, personal growth, and humour (for females only). In addition, the factor 'symptoms' showed significant effects for self-blame, daydreaming and having fantasies and wishful thinking, emotionality. No significant interactions were found. The results are discussed in the light of current knowledge on coping styles as moderators of the stress-illness relationship and on the relationship between coping and psychosocial load and symptoms, respectively.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.