PurposeThis paper introduces the concept of policy efficiency of banks as their efficiency in implementing the government's policies. It further compares the Indian public sector banks (PSBs) and private sector banks (PVBs) on two efficiency paradigms, operational efficiency and policy efficiency.Design/methodology/approachA three-stage analysis is carried out on data collected for 19 PSBs and 16 PVBs for ten years. Non-radial DEA with slack-based measure (SBM) is used to obtain efficiency scores of the banks for the two efficiency paradigms. The efficiency scores and the changes in efficiency and Malmquist index are further analysed by Tobit regression and seemingly unrelated regression (SUR) models.FindingsPVBs are found to be more operationally efficient than PSBs. On the contrary, PSBs are found to be more policy efficient. Among the PSBs, the older and larger banks performed better in both the paradigms. Though Indian banks have become more operational and policy efficient over the years, the rate of improvement is slowing down.Practical implicationsResults imply that evaluating banks, especially PSBs, only on their operational efficiency is myopic. Their efficacies must also be measured by the roles they play on social and policy front. The loss of efficiency of Indian PSBs in a competitive environment should provoke thoughts of reforms. The study suggests that the proposed merger of PSBs to form large banks might be fruitful.Originality/valueThe study contributes to the literature by introducing the measure of policy efficiency. It shows that the Indian PSBs are indispensable as vehicles of government policy implementation.

The world today is edging towards a precipice of crisis and disaster, pushed continually by unplanned development, and myopic vision of nations, and their leaders. The world requires moving towards sustainable development, which envisages the idea of meeting the worlds present needs, without compromising on the resources for future generations. Bhutan, a small Himalayan kingdom, is aspiring to achieve just that. This paper strives to highlight the uniqueness of Bhutan and discusses upon three of the vital tasks undertaken by Bhutan viz. promoting sustainable agriculture in the form of organic farming, sustainable energy production in the form of hydropower, and sustainable ecotourism as an important industry for the future, and in the process attempts to associate these factors to Bhutans ideology of ensuring happiness for all its citizen through a path of sustainable economic development. This paper attempts at sensitising the audience to the idea that Bhutan is marching ahead on the right path towards achieving sustainable economic development

No abstract

This study aims to explore the true nature of the impact of working capital management (WCM) efficiency, measured by cash conversion cycle (CCC), on the stock market performance (proxied by stock’s Alpha) of Indian non-financial firms. The article presents four possible models from literature and argues why the relationship should be non-linear. Generalized method of moments (GMM) estimation is used on firm-level data of 718 Indian firms from 11 industries listed in the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) from 2011 to 2017. A negative relationship is confirmed. However, contrary to prior findings, neither a quadratic relationship nor the deviations from industry median CCC can explain the relationship for Indian firms. Therefore, firms are divided into CCC decile-based equally weighted portfolios and estimation of a threshold level of CCC is carried out iteratively. Threshold thus obtained is validated at the firm level, using dynamic panel through GMM estimation. The novelty of this study is that it is the first one to propose the possibility of a universal threshold level of working capital (WC) efficiency and its impact on the market performance of firms in India. The article argues that in India, due to uncertainties in supply chains, firms, as well as the investors, prefer a threshold level of investment in WC. If CCC is above the threshold level, firms’ excess stock returns fall significantly, while there is no impact below the threshold level. The study is relevant for managers so that they can maintain WC below a threshold level, as well as for investors who can use the threshold WC criteria for valuation and selection of stocks.

No abstract