Background:Olfactory neuroblastoma (ONB) is a rare malignant neuroectodermal tumor of the nasal cavity. Mixed olfactory neuroblastoma which contains areas of divergent differentiation is even rare. Till date, only 4 cases of mixed olfactory neuroblastomas have been reported.Case Description:We report the case of a 46-year-old male who presented with the chief complaints of nasal bleeding and nasal obstruction since 4 months. Radiological imaging was suggestive of a large heterogeneous mass in the left superior nasal cavity with extensions into bilateral maxillary, ethmoidal, and sphenoidal sinuses, as well as into the anterior cranial fossa. Bifrontal osteoplastic craniotomy and excision of the intracranial part of the tumor from above and transnasal endoscopic removal of the mass in the nasal cavities and paranasal sinuses from below was done. Postoperative radiological imaging was suggestive of gross complete excision of the mass. Histopathological diagnosis was “mixed olfactory neuroblastoma-carcinoma (squamous and glandular differentiation) Hyams grade IV.” On immunohistochemistry, the tumor cells were positive for neuron specific enolase (NSE), synaptophysin, chromogranin, and CD56 and peripherally for S100. Because of personal reasons, the patient did not take adjuvant radiotherapy. He presented again after 2 months with a full blown recurrence of esthesioneuroblastoma with similar extensions as before. The patient is now planned for salvage surgery followed by adjuvant chemoradiation.Conclusion:We report the 5th case in the world of mixed olfactory neuroblastoma-carcinoma with squamous and glandular differentiation. From an analysis of the findings in the 5 reported cases of mixed olfactory neuroblastomas, one might infer that a separate subcategory of ONB, i.e., mixed ONB, should be considered because mixed ONBs have an aggressive behavior, high rates of recurrence, and these tumors should be treated aggressively by multimodality treatment.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Intraocular glial lesions are rare and include retinal gliosis, hamartomas, and astrocytomas and rarely ependymomas. Ependymomas are slow-growing glial tumors preferentially arising in the central nervous system (CNS), occasionally presenting at sites outside the CNS, with only 2 cases of primary retinal ependymoma reported till date. We report herein the third such case of a 20-year-old male who presented with a painful blind eye. The enucleated specimen showed presence of a glial tumor with cells arranged in sheets as well as few true rosettes and pseudo-rosettes and an immunohistochemical profile similar to a classical ependymoma at usual sites in the CNS. Additionally, the presence of blood-filled spaces and few proliferating blood vessels made it a diagnostic challenge. All retinal glial lesions are positive for GFAP and S100. Therefore, immunostaining for EMA as well as the MIB-1-labeling index maybe vital in differentiating ependymomas from other intraocular glial lesions.

No abstract

Objective Repressor of Silencing (ROS1) gene rearrangement in the lung adenocarcinomas is one of the targetable mutually exclusive genomic alteration. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), immunohistochemistry (IHC), next-generation sequencing, and reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction assays are generally used to detect ROS1 gene alterations. We evaluated the correlation between ROS1 IHC and FISH analysis considering FISH as the gold standard method to determine the utility of IHC as a screening method for lung adenocarcinoma. Materials and Methods A total of 374 advanced pulmonary adenocarcinoma patients were analyzed for ROS1 IHC on Ventana Benchmark XT platform using D4D6 rabbit monoclonal antibody. FISH assay was performed in parallel in all these cases using the Vysis ROS1 Break Apart FISH probe. Statistical Analysis The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy were evaluated. Results A total of 17 tumors were positive either by IHC or FISH analysis or both (true positive). Four tumors were positive by IHC (H-score range: 120–270), while negative on FISH analysis (false positive by IHC). One tumor was IHC negative, but positive by FISH analysis (false negative). The sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were 94.4% (confidence interval [CI]: 72.71–99.86%), 63.6% (CI: 30.79–89.07%), 2.6 (CI: 1.18–5.72), 0.09 (CI: 0.01–0.62), 80.95% (CI: 65.86–90.35%), 87.5% (CI: 49.74–98.02%), and 82.76%, respectively. Conclusion ROS1 IHC has high sensitivity at a cost of lower specificity for the detection of ROS1 gene rearrangement. All IHC positive cases should undergo a confirmatory FISH test as this testing algorithm stands as a reliable and economic tool to screen ROS1 rearrangement in lung adenocarcinomas.

Summary Background Endometrial cancer (EC) is a common gynecological malignancy. Around 25-30% patients have mismatch repair deficiency (MMRd). Lynch syndrome is caused by germline mutations in MMR genes. Lynch-associated tumours have better prognosis, however implications for prognosis and survival is less known. Microsatellite insufficiency (MSI) is associated with high neoantigen loads and number of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, which overexpresses PD-1 and PD-L1 and are excellent candidates for PD-1-targeted immunotherapies. In this study, we aim to evaluate the utility of MMR in patients with EC and its clinico-pathological correlation. Methods Eighty-two cases of EC which underwent MMR evaluation over a period of five years at our centre were included. Demographics, clinical details including family history, histopathological and immunohistochemical (IHC) parameters were recorded. Tumors with loss-of at least one protein were considered MMR deficient (MMRd) and those with intact expression were MMR proficient (MMRp). Results Of 82 cases tested, 27 (33%) were MMRd. Frequencies of IHC MMR loss of expression were: MLH1/PMS2: 17 (21%), MSH6 loss only: 3 (4%), MSH2/MSH6 loss: 3 (4%), PMS2 loss: 2 (2%). In MMRd cases, most common histologic tumor type was endometrioid adenocarcinoma (70%). Loss of expression was significantly (p < 0.001) more frequent in lower uterine segment involvement and positive family history. Conclusions MSI plays an important role in the progression of endometrial cancer. Lower uterine segment involvement and positive family history are significant predictor of MMR loss. Routine testing of MMR proteins in endometrial cancer can contribute to screening of Lynch syndrome families and make immunotherapy available as a treatment option.