Plagiarisme merupakan perbuatan salah yang serius sebab mengambil karya orang lain dan mengakuinya sebagai karya sendiri. Tindakan plagiarisme menurunkan moral dan harkat pelaku serta berdampak pada disintegritas sivitas akademik karena tindakan mengutip tanpa izin harus dicegah dan apabila sudah terjadi harus diatasi. Perilaku menjiplak karya orang lain tanpa mencantumkan sumber dan nama pengarang asli berakibat buruk kepada pengembangan ilmu sebab dengan mengutip tidak akan muncul pemikiran baru. Pada tahun 2010, Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi telah mengeluarkan peraturan tentang cara pencegahan dan penanggulangan plagiarisme termasuk sanksi untuk dosen, mahasiswa, dan calon guru besar sekalipun. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menguraikan arti dan dampak plagiarisme, sanksi bagi pelaku, serta upaya pencegahan dan penanggulangannya. Tulisan tentang plagiarisme masih minim di Indonesia sehingga isi artikel ini banyak merujuk kepada tulisan sumber asing yang secara kontekstual mungkin saja berbeda dengan kondisi di Indonesia. Berbagai bentuk plagiarisme meliputi word by word plagiarism, word switch plagiarism, style plagiarism, metaphor plagiarism, idea plagiarism, self plagiarism, dan plagiarisme dari akses elektronik internet. Beberapa cara memperkecil risiko plagiarisme yang diusulkan untuk Fakultas Kesehatan Masyarakat Universitas Indonesia adalah melakukan upaya pencegahan secara sistem antara lain menciptakan iklim pendidikan yang kondusif, menghargai tulisan orang lain, pelatihan parafrasa, rujukan, penulisan referensi yang benar, menciptakan peranti lunak untuk pengecekan duplikasi artikel, dan rajin bertanya untuk mendapatkan pengarahan.Kata kunci: Plagiarisme, karya ilmiah, perguruan tinggiAbstractPlagiarisme is indeed wrong since it’s a claim of somebody’s scientific work as its own. In the academic world, plagiarism is also considered a moral misconduct which brought a negative impact to academic integrity. Therefore, plagiarism needs to be prevented and when happened, strict sanction and punishment need to be sentenced. In 2010, Ministry of Education has issued a decree to prevent and stop plagiarism among the academics. This article attempts to describe types of plagiarism, why it happens, and how to prevent and solution. Many references used came from foreign articles, since few were known about plagiarism in Indonesia. Types of plagiarism such as word by word plagiarism, word switch plagiarism, style plagiarism, metaphor plagiarism, idea plagiarism, self plagiarism, and plagiarism through internet were described. As an educational institution, the Faculty of Public Health University of Indonesia is urged to put serious attention to prevent and eliminate plagiarism using a system approach by creating conducive educational environment, respecting other’s scientific work, conducting training on paraphrase, citation, and reference writing in a proper way; creating and using simple electronic software to check sci- entific article plagiarism and encourage students to seek advice to prevent this disrespectful deed.Key words: Plagiarism, scientific writing, university
Acute upper respiratory tract infection (URTI) is one of the health problem in a community with high prevalence and healthcare cost. At the primary health center (PHC), URTI is one of the most common diseases with a prevalence 45.64% in Bogor city on 2015, while Basic Health Research 2013 data showed the prevalence of URTI in Indonesia by 25%. This study analyzes the antibiotic prescription for URTI patients, factors influencing the rationale of antibiotic prescriptions, and the rational use of medicine (RUM) program management at Primary Health Centers at Bogor city. The research was analytic descriptive cross-sectional study by collecting data from medical records of patients diagnosed with non-pneumonia URTI, observation for outpatient health care, and interview with all responsible persons. The data were collected on 16 April-20 May 2018 from primary health centers at Bogor city. The samples were 359 oral antibiotic prescriptions of three physicians and antibiotics were prescribed for 122 (34%) cases from 359 cases of which 102 were evaluated for rationality according to local guidelines issued by the Ministry of Health Republic of Indonesia. The URTI diagnosis is classified into few categories with the prevalence of nasopharyngitis (62.9%), pharyngitis (30.6%), tonsillitis (5.3%), and sinusitis and acute otitis media (0.6%). Most antibiotics used were amoxicillin and cefadroxil. This study revealed that antibiotics prescribed 88% inaccuracy of antibiotics duration, 12% incompatibility with the guidance of antibiotic, 3% incompatibility with guidance and imprecise duration, and 1% inaccuracy of dose. Some factors that influencing rationality of antibiotics prescription was lack of physician's adherence to the clinical guideline, pharmacist role was not optimal, and lack of monitoring evaluating.
Pelayanan kesehatan gigi dimasa pandemi menjadi hal yang diperhatikan karena rentannya tenaga medis maupun pasien yang tertular pada saat perawatan yang menghasilkan aerosol, oleh karena itu peran telemedicine menjadi alternatif yang di sarankan ditengah pandemi yang sedang terjadi saat ini, pasien dapat berkonsultasi tanpa harus bertatap muka dengan dokter gigi dan perencanaan perawatan lanjutan dapat lakukan dengan perjanjian lanjutan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui apakah penggunaan teledentistry efektif dan menjadi alternatif terbaik dalam konsultasi masalah kesehatan gigi dan mulut. Metode penelitian dilakukan dengan Sistematik Review dengan pencarian data base melalui scopus, sciencedirect, proquest, dan pubmed yang dibatasi dari tahun 2020-2021 yang berkaitan dengan teledentistry dimasa pandemi.Setalah dilakukan penyaringan dan dilakukan kritial appraisal di dapat 7 artikel yang di telaah. Hasil didapatkan bahwa penggunaan teledentistry memberikan keefektifitasan dalam mendapatkan diagnosa, kemudahan dalam pengaplikasian, penghematan biaya, serta disisi dokter gigi didapatkan bahwa teledentistry sangat membantu di tengah pandemi pada proses konsultasi dan penjadwalan waktu yang tepat untuk dilakukan perawatan
Background: The patient safety incident reporting systems is designed to improve the health care by learning from mistakes to minimize the recurrence mistakes, however the reporting rate is low.Aims: Integrative literature review was chosen to identify and analyze the barriers of reporting patient safety incidents by Health Care Workers (HCWs) in hospital.Methods: Searching for articles in electronic database consisting of Medline, CINAHL and Scopus resulted in 11 relevant articles originating from 9 countries.Results: There are differences but similar in barriers to reporting patient safety incident among HCWs. The barriers that occur are the existence of shaming and blaming culture, lack of time to report, lack of knowledge of the reporting system, and lack of support from the management.Conclusion: Each hospital has different barriers in reporting incident and the interventions carried out must be in accordance with the existing barriers.Keywords: barrier of reporting, incident reporting, patient safety incident
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.