No abstract

BackgroundManagement of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) is important as they cause treatment interruption or discontinuation, more often seen with combination immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. Here, we retrospectively evaluated the safety and effectiveness of anti-interleukin-6 receptor (anti-IL-6R) as therapy for irAEs.MethodsWe performed a retrospective multicenter study evaluating patients diagnosed with de novo irAEs or flare of pre-existing autoimmune disease following ICI and were treated with anti-IL-6R. Our objectives were to assess the improvement of irAEs as well as the overall tumor response rate (ORR) before and after anti-IL-6R treatment.ResultsWe identified a total of 92 patients who received therapeutic anti-IL-6R antibodies (tocilizumab or sarilumab). Median age was 61 years, 63% were men, 69% received anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) antibodies alone, and 26% patients were treated with the combination of anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 and anti-PD-1 antibodies. Cancer types were primarily melanoma (46%), genitourinary cancer (35%), and lung cancer (8%). Indications for using anti-IL-6R antibodies included inflammatory arthritis (73%), hepatitis/cholangitis (7%), myositis/myocarditis/myasthenia gravis (5%), polymyalgia rheumatica (4%), and one patient each with autoimmune scleroderma, nephritis, colitis, pneumonitis and central nervous system vasculitis. Notably, 88% of patients had received corticosteroids, and 36% received other disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) as first-line therapies, but without adequate improvement. After initiation of anti-IL-6R (as first-line or post-corticosteroids and DMARDs), 73% of patients showed resolution or change to ≤grade 1 of irAEs after a median of 2.0 months from initiation of anti-IL-6R therapy. Six patients (7%) stopped anti-IL-6R due to adverse events. Of 70 evaluable patients by RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) V.1.1 criteria; the ORR was 66% prior versus 66% after anti-IL-6R (95% CI, 54% to 77%), with 8% higher complete response rate. Of 34 evaluable patients with melanoma, the ORR was 56% prior and increased to 68% after anti-IL-6R (p=0.04).ConclusionTargeting IL-6R could be an effective approach to treat several irAE types without hindering antitumor immunity. This study supports ongoing clinical trials evaluating the safety and efficacy of tocilizumab (anti-IL-6R antibody) in combination with ICIs (NCT04940299,NCT03999749).

PURPOSE Compared with people living without HIV (PWOH), people living with HIV (PWH) and cancer have traditionally been excluded from immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) trials. Furthermore, there is a paucity of real-world data on the use of ICIs in PWH and cancer. METHODS This retrospective study included PWH treated with anti–PD-1- or anti–PD-L1-based therapies for advanced cancers. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Objective response rates (ORRs) were measured per RECIST 1.1 or other tumor-specific criteria, whenever feasible. Restricted mean survival time (RMST) was used to compare OS and PFS between matched PWH and PWOH with metastatic NSCLC (mNSCLC). RESULTS Among 390 PWH, median age was 58 years, 85% (n = 331) were males, 36% (n = 138) were Black; 70% (n = 274) received anti–PD-1/anti–PD-L1 monotherapy. Most common cancers were NSCLC (28%, n = 111), hepatocellular carcinoma ([HCC]; 11%, n = 44), and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC; 10%, n = 39). Seventy percent (152/216) had CD4+ T cell counts ≥200 cells/µL, and 94% (179/190) had HIV viral load <400 copies/mL. Twenty percent (79/390) had any grade immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and 7.7% (30/390) had grade ≥3 irAEs. ORRs were 69% (nonmelanoma skin cancer), 31% (NSCLC), 16% (HCC), and 11% (HNSCC). In the matched mNSCLC cohort (61 PWH v 110 PWOH), 20% (12/61) PWH and 22% (24/110) PWOH had irAEs. Adjusted 42-month RMST difference was –0.06 months (95% CI, –5.49 to 5.37; P = .98) for PFS and 2.23 months (95% CI, –4.02 to 8.48; P = .48) for OS. CONCLUSION Among PWH, ICIs demonstrated differential activity across cancer types with no excess toxicity. Safety and activity of ICIs were similar between matched cohorts of PWH and PWOH with mNSCLC.

ObjectivesTo compare the safety and effectiveness of biologic and conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) for immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated inflammatory arthritis (ICI-IA).MethodsThe retrospective multicentre observational study included patients with a diagnosis of ICI-IA treated with a tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi), interleukin-6 receptor inhibitor (IL6Ri) and/or methotrexate (MTX); patients with pre-existing autoimmune disease were excluded. The primary outcome was time to cancer progression from ICI initiation; the secondary outcome was time to arthritis control from DMARD initiation. Cox proportional hazard models were used to compare medication groups, adjusting for confounders.Results147 patients were included (mean age 60.3 (SD 11.9) years, 66 (45%) women). ICI-IA treatment was TNFi in 33 (22%), IL6Ri 42 (29%) and MTX 72 (49%). After adjustment for time from ICI initiation to DMARD initiation, time to cancer progression was significantly shorter for TNFi compared with MTX (HR 3.27 (95% CI 1.21 to 8.84, p=0.019)) while the result for IL6Ri was HR 2.37 (95% CI 0.94 to 5.98, p=0.055). Time to arthritis control was faster for TNFi compared with MTX (HR 1.91 (95% CI 1.06 to 3.45, p=0.032)) while the result for IL6Ri was HR 1.66 (95% CI 0.93 to 2.97, p=0.089). A subset analysis in patients with melanoma gave similar results for both cancer progression and arthritis control.ConclusionThe treatment of ICI-IA with a biologic DMARD is associated with more rapid arthritis control than with MTX, but may be associated with a shorter time to cancer progression.

BackgroundManaging immune-related adverse events (irAEs) has become a critical challenge with the increasing implementation of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in cancer treatment. IrAEs may cause treatment interruption or discontinuation, the rate of which is higher with multi-agent ICI regimen needed to overcome resistant tumor microenvironment. Herein, we describe our clinical experience using interleukin-6 receptor antagonists (IL-6RA) to manage irAEs in cancer patients receiving ICIs.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective, multi-center study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of IL-6RA for irAE management. Eligible patients were identified from the institutional databases (pharmacy records, tumor registries, oncology and specialty clinic records for diagnosis and management of irAEs). The primary objective was assessing changes in irAE symptoms. The secondary objective was assessing overall response rate (ORR) before and after IL-6RA treatment.ResultsA total of 81 patients received an IL-6RA (tocilizumab or sarilumab); median age was 66 years, 41% were females, 70% received single-agent anti-PD-1 and 23% received nivolumab plus ipilimumab. Cancer types were primarily melanoma (44%), genitourinary cancer (37%), and lung cancer (8.6%). Indications for using IL-6RA were inflammatory arthritis (74%), polymyalgia rheumatica (6%), myositis/myocarditis/myasthenia gravis (5%) encephalitis (5%), and 1% each with pneumonitis, colitis, hepatitis, central nervous system vasculitis, oral mucositis, and flare of pre-existing myasthenia gravis, psoriasis, and Crohn's disease. Notably, 83 % of patients received corticosteroids as first-line therapy, and 29% received disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, without improvement. After initiation of IL-6RA, improvement of irAEs was observed in 78% after a median of 2.1 months. Of evaluable patients with inflammatory arthritis, the median clinical disease activity index (CDAI) at IL-6RA initiation was 28, indicating high disease activity, and dropped to 6 after treatment, indicating low disease activity. The median CRP level at IL-6RA initiation was 59.5 mg/L and dropped to 1.5 mg/L within 10 weeks of treatment. Seventy-two patients tolerated IL-6RA, and nine stopped treatment due to side effects. Thirty-eight patients were evaluated for tumor response by RECIST 1.1 criteria; the ORR was 58% prior to IL-6RA and 66% after treatment. Of 21 evaluable melanoma patients, the ORR was 62% prior to IL-6RA compared to 71% after treatment (figure 1).ConclusionsOur study demonstrated that targeting IL-6R could be an effective approach to mitigate autoimmunity while maintaining and possibly boosting tumor immunity. Clinical trials are currently evaluating the safety and efficacy of tocilizumab in combination with ICIs in patients with melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, and urothelial carcinoma (NCT04940299, NCT03999749).Ethics ApprovalThe study was approved by The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center intuition's Ethics Board, approval number PA19-0089Abstract 816 Figure 1A patient with sinonasal malignant melanoma involving the ethmoid air cells. (A) Baseline maximum intensity projection (MIP) PET image at 1 month before initiation of ICI (ipilimumab and nivolumab) shows avid FDG uptake of the tumor at the ethmoid air cells (arrow). (B) MIP PET image at 7 months after ICI initiation shows resolution of the FDG uptake at the site of the tumor, consistent with complete response. (C) Concurrent MIP PET and corresponding fused PET-CT images 7 months after initiation of ICI show avid radiotracer uptake at the knee joints, suggestive of arthritis. (D) MIP PET image at 10 months after concomitant therapy with IL6R antagonist and nivolumab shows persistent absence of hypermetabolic radiotracer activity at the paranasal sinuses, consistent with complete response. (E) Concurrent MIP PET and corresponding fused PET-CT images show physiologic radiotracer uptake at the knee joints, consistent with resolving arthritis.