00001 ăWOS:000390627700006International audienceThis study in French Guiana evaluates the changes of crab assemblages and their bioturbation activities between mangrove early stages (pioneer and young mangrove) and within stages by taking their spatial heterogeneity (tidal channels, flat areas, pools) into account. The results show differences in crab assemblage structure between and within the early stages of mangrove in relation to microhabitat and sediment characteristics. The sediment reworking rates are a function of the biomass or density of particular species (Ucides cordatus, Uca cumulanta) and burrower functional groups. Crab species or functional interactions mediate changes in sediment reworking rates suggesting the need to consider entire benthic communities rather than single species. This study suggests that the role of the micro habitat in determining the biologically -induced sediment reworking rates depends on the age of the mangrove. Feeding activity results in a sediment turnover of 11.7 +/- 9.7 g(dw) m(-2) day(-1) and 6.8 +/- 3.0 g(dw) m(-2) day(-1) in the pioneer and young mangroves, respectively. Burrow maintenance excavates 40.5 +/- 7.4 g(dw) m(-2) day(-1) and 251.3 +/- 419.7 g(dw) m(-2) day(-1) in the pioneer and young mangroves, respectively. Upscaling to the studied area (Sinnamary estuary: 6 km(2)), shows that 500 tons.day(-1) and 20 tons.day(-1) of sediments could be excavated and pelletized, respectively, during the spring tides of the dry season. Thus, biological sediment reworking would greatly contribute to the sedimentary dynamics of the Guianese mangroves under Amazonian influence. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.