Background Satisfaction is a key measure of quality performance and an important tool for continual improvement. This study aimed to assess clinicians’ satisfaction with laboratory services delivered at public hospitals and health centres. Methods A facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted in northeast Ethiopia from May to June 2019. A total of 224 clinicians were randomly selected from 8 public hospitals and 24 health centres. Satisfaction with multiple aspects of laboratory services was assessed using a self-administered questionnaire, on a rating scale of 1 (very dissatisfied) to 5 points (very satisfied). Laboratory quality assessment was performed using WHO-AFRO’s stepwise accreditation checklist. Multivariable logistic regression model was fitted to determine the association of factors with clinicians’ overall satisfaction level using STATA ver14.1. A p- value < 0.05 was considered significant. Results Overall, the majority (72.8%) of clinicians were satisfied. A higher percentage of clinicians were satisfied in hospitals than in primary health centres (56.0% vs. 76.8%, p = 0.003). The lowest mean ratings were obtained for the helpfulness of the user handbook (3.3), provision of STAT/urgent services (3.7) and adequacy of the test menu provided (3.8). The clinicians’ timely receipt of results, notification of panic results and perceived reliability of results, as well as the laboratories’ concordance rate of malaria microscopy results (based on blinded slide rechecking), were significantly associated with clinicians’ satisfaction (all, p ≤ 0.036). There were no associations with socio-demographic characteristics, stepwise accreditation level or star grade of the laboratories (p- values > 0.05). Conclusions More clinicians were dissatisfied with the services of the larger hospital laboratories than those of the primary health centres. Improvements need to emphasize the identified specific gaps related to both users’ experiences and technical quality aspects.
Background Satisfaction has become a key measure of quality and an important tool for improvement. Laboratories are increasingly required to regularly assess satisfaction of their customers. This study aimed to assess clinicians’ satisfaction with laboratory services and associated factors at public health facilities. Methods A facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted in Northeast Ethiopia from May to June 2019. Eight hospitals and 24 health centres were first selected using a stratified sampling method, and a total of 224 randomly selected clinicians were included. Satisfaction with multiple aspects of laboratory services was assessed using a self-administered questionnaire, on a rating scale of 1 (very dissatisfied) to 5 points (very satisfied). Laboratory quality assessment was performed using WHO-AFRO’s stepwise accreditation checklist. Multivariable logistic regression model was fitted to determine the association between independent variables and clinicians’ overall satisfaction level using STATA ver14.1. A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant. Results Overall, 72.8% of the clinicians were satisfied. Lowest mean ratings were obtained for the helpfulness of the laboratory handbook (3.3), provision of STAT/urgent services (3.7), and adequacy of tests provided (3.8). The clinicians’ timely receipt of results (AOR = 2.3, 95% CI = 1.1–5.0), notification of panic results (AOR = 2.5, 95% CI = 1.1–5.6), perceived quality/reliability of test results (AOR = 3.1, 95% CI = 1.5–6.3), and the laboratories’ rate of concordant malaria microscopy results (AOR = 4.1, 95% CI = 1.8–9.3), were significantly associated with satisfaction. Conclusions Nearly one-third of clinicians were not satisfied with the laboratory services. Laboratory managers should emphasize the timely communication of STAT/urgent and panic results, and the reliability of test results, to improve users’ satisfaction and overall quality of care.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.