Background: Mobile Health applications (mHealth apps) have been demonstrated as an effective strategy for improving self-care abilities in patients with heart failure (HF). However, the uptake of the apps by patients remains low. Little is known about the patient’s perspectives on the factors that influence their uptake of the apps. This study explored HF patients’ perspectives on the barriers and motivators to the uptake and utilization of mHealth apps. Method: Semi-structure interviews and demographic questionnaires were used to gather data from patients with HF (N= 43) recruited from an academic medical center. An in-depth analysis of the interviews was conducted using a deductive thematic approach with the help of qualitative software, Atias.ti version 8. Results: Among the participants ( median age = 62 [35-92] years, mean±SD ejection fraction = 37.3±17, 41.9% female, 70% smartphone owners), 90.7% (n =39) had no prior use of mHealth apps for self-care. The majority of the participants with no prior use of mhealth (79.5%, n = 31), including 64.7% (n= 17) of participants aged 65yrs and above, expressed an intention to use the apps for self-care. All the participants (100%) stated that their healthcare providers (HCP) had never recommended the use of mHealth apps for self-care. Other barriers included lack of knowledge of the apps, the perceived financial cost of mHealth apps or smartphones, concern for privacy, and security of personal information, resistance to the change of previous self-care strategies, and perceived technology incompetence. Motivators to the uptake of mHealth included perceived usefulness of mHealth apps, mHealth apps’ ease of use, and the belief that the use of mHealth apps may alleviate perceived threat to health, and availability of technical support. Conclusion: This study suggests that patients with HF are willing to use mHealth apps to improve their self-care abilities. Thus, the effort to improve patients’ perceptions of mHealth apps’ usefulness and HCP recommendation of the apps are warranted to turn patients' “intention to use” to actual apps usage.
Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Introduction The computing and communication features of mobile devices have been leveraged in mobile Health (mHealth) interventions to provide comprehensive and tailored support that may have positive outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF. However, the effects of the interventions have shown mixed evidence. Considering that patients’ engagement is a prerequisite for the effectiveness of the interventions, understanding how patients engage with the interventions, and the effects of patients’ engagement on HF outcomes may explain the mixed findings. Objective This study aimed to synthesize current evidence on measures of HF patients’ engagement with mHealth interventions, and the effects of the interventions on HF outcomes. Method In accordance with the Arksey and O’Malley framework for scoping review, a comprehensive search of the literature was conducted in 7 databases for relevant studies published in the English language from 2009 to Feb. 2021. The descriptive characteristics of the studies were reported. Thematic analysis was conducted to identify themes that described patients’ engagement in the qualitative studies included in the review. Results The review synthesized 29 studies that operationalized engagement with mHealth interventions in 3665 patients with HF, ranging from a sample of 7 to 1571, with a median of 80 patients. Patients’ engagement with mHealth interventions was measured quantitively based on system usage data (82.7%, 24/29), qualitatively by semi-structured interviews and focus groups (10.3%, 3/29), and by mixed methods or combination of qualitative and system usage data (17.2%, 5/29). System usage data were evaluated using 7 metrics: (1) number of physiological parameters measured (88.5%, 3/26); (2) duration of use or time spent (3.8%, 6/26); (3) features accessed/screen viewed (11.5%, 3/26); (4) number of HF educational videos viewed (7.7%, 2/26); (5) number of SMS response (3.8%, 1/26); (6) number of HF questionnaire completed (3.8%, 1/26; (7)numbers of logins (5%, 1/19). There is a lack of consistency in how system usage metrics were reported across the studies; 73.7 % of the studies reported only the descriptive statistics of the System usage data. Intervention usage was the most identified subtheme in the qualitative measure. The effect of patients’ engagement with mHealth interventions on HF-related outcomes was inconclusive. Conclusion The operational definitions of patients’ engagement with mHealth interventions are underreported and lack consistency. The application of inferential analytical methods to the engagement data is extremely limited, which indicates a gap in mHealth research in patients with HF. More research focusing on developing optimal and standardized measures of patients’ engagement that may be applied across different study designs is warranted
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.