Visual ratings are the standard for evaluating turfgrass quality. However, to provide more objective evaluations and to address statistical concerns, other methods have been developed to measure turfgrass quality, including digital image analysis and measurements of chlorophyll content. These have been largely applied to traditionally used turfgrass species, but here we used these methods to evaluate turfgrass quality of nontraditional species and mixtures that are native or adapted to the intermountain west region of North America. Two fertilizer treatments (1.0 or 2.0 lb/1000 ft2 nitrogen) were applied to 21 different species and species mixtures in North Logan, UT. These plots were irrigated to replace 60% of the local evapotranspiration rate and were mowed at 4 inches. Turfgrass quality ratings were most effective in measuring quality among the diverse species used in this study. Because of the wider variation in acceptable visual characteristics and lower quality expectations for low-maintenance native turf, the objective evaluation methods proved less useful. Generally, chlorophyll meter data, digital image analysis of cover, and digital image analysis of color data were not well correlated with human visual quality ratings in this study. Measurements were well correlated in some species, but not in others. These methods can supplement, but cannot replace, human visual turfgrass quality ratings for comparison of dissimilar grasses.

Annual bluegrass (ABG) (Poa annua L.) is a prolific seed producer in the spring on golf courses that in turn decreases aesthetic quality and trueness of ball roll on coolseason putting greens. Proxy (ethephon) applied twice in the spring after green-up is the current industry standard after the loss of Embark (mefluidide) from the turf and ornamental market. However, plant growth regulators including Proxy have been used for years to help suppress ABG seedheads with inconsistent success. The primary objective of this study was to determine if ABG seedhead suppression is improved by adding a late fall application of Proxy to the two traditional spring applications of plant growth regulators at nine locations with diverse environments. A second objective was to determine the importance of including Primo Maxx (trinexapac-ethyl) in fall and spring applications. Adding a late fall application of Proxy prior to the two spring applications (F+S+S) improved control of ABG seedheads over the traditional two spring applications (S+S), but the magnitude of improvement varied among locations. Abbreviations: ABG, annual bluegrass; AUSCPC, area under seedhead cover progress curve; CBG, creeping bentgrass; DAISA, days after initial spring application; F+S+S, Proxy + Primo Maxx applied once in fall plus twice in spring; GDD, growing degree day; S+S, Proxy + Primo Maxx applied twice in spring. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

Humic substances are frequently applied to creeping bentgrass (Agrostis palustris Huds.) on golf putting greens to improve turf health and are marketed to enhance nutrient acquisition and possibly aid in retaining water in drought prone environments, but information on the role of humic substances in increasing soil water retention is limited. Additionally, it is difficult to separate the beneficial effects of nutrients and other ingredients added to commercial humic formulations from the effects of the pure humic substance. In our study, pure humic acid, tannic and citric acids were added to simulated creeping bentgrass putting greens. The organic acids were applied at normalized carbon rates of 250 mg C per litre by watering solutions through an automated irrigation system. Volumetric water content (VWC) and irrigation frequency, shoot and root growth, and tissue nutrient concentration of the turf were measured. None of the organic acid treatments improved water retention in the simulated greens. The humic acid‐treated greens required more frequent irrigation than the untreated greens indicating that they were drying out more quickly. In addition, the addition of humic acid did not result in an increased tissue concentration of nutrients in the creeping bentgrass, top growth or dry shoot mass compared with the other treatments. However, creeping bentgrass root length was greater in the greens treated with humic acid compared with the untreated control.

Humic substances are often used as an amendment in putting greens to improve turf health, but little is known regarding their effects on soil moisture retention. Commercial humic substance products and pure organic acids were applied to three golf course putting greens in Utah in 2006 and the Utah State University research putting green in 2006 and 2007. These treatments were evaluated for effects on soil volumetric water content, phosphorus uptake, and chlorophyll content of creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera L.). Three irrigation levels ‐ 80%, 70%, and 60% ‐ of reference evapotranspiration (ETo) were imposed on the turf at the research putting green. Humic substances did not increase moisture retention in putting green soils as pure humic acid significantly decreased soil volumetric water content compared to the control. Both humic acid and fulvic acid‐treated plots had lower soil moisture content readings than the control at a depth of 10 to 15 cm during the growing season. Uptake of P by creeping bentgrass was significantly decreased with the application of humic acid, and no differences were observed for chlorophyll content of the turf with any humic substance treatment. While they may provide other benefits, humic substances may not provide superintendents with benefits of reducing water or P fertilizer on putting greens.

No abstract