Background: Accumulating data support a protective role of Helicobacter pylori against inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), which might be mediated by strain-specific constituents, specifically cagA expression. Aim:To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to more clearly define the association between CagA seropositivity and IBD. Methods:We identified comparative studies that included sufficient detail to determine the odds or risk of IBD, Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) amongst individuals with vs without evidence of cagA expression (eg CagA seropositivity).Estimates were pooled using a random effects model. Results:Three clinical studies met inclusion criteria. cagA expression was represented by CagA seropositivity in all studies. Compared to CagA seronegativity overall, CagA seropositivity was associated with lower odds of IBD (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.21-0.44) and CD (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.17-0.38), and statistically nonsignificant lower odds for UC (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.35-1.32). Similarly, compared to H pylori non-exposed individuals, H pylori exposed, CagA seropositive individuals had lower odds of IBD (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.16-0.41) and CD (OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.15-0.35), but not UC (OR 0.66, 0.34-1.27).However, there was no significant difference in the odds of IBD, CD or UC between H pylori exposed, CagA seronegative and H pylori non-exposed individuals. Conclusion:We found evidence for a significant association between CagA seropositive H pylori exposure and reduced odds of IBD, particularly CD, but not for CagA seronegative H pylori exposure. Additional studies are needed to confirm these findings and define underlying mechanisms. S U PP O RTI N G I N FO R M ATI O NAdditional supporting information will be found online in the Supporting Information section at the end of the article.How to cite this article: Tepler A, Narula N, Peek RM Jr, et al. Systematic review with meta-analysis: association betweenHelicobacter pylori CagA seropositivity and odds of inflammatory bowel disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther.

Background & Aims: Previous or current infection with Helicobacter pylori (exposure) has been reported to protect against eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), perhaps due to H pylori -induced immunomodulation. However, findings vary. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies to more clearly define the association between H pylori exposure and EoE. Methods: We searched 4 large databases to identify comparative clinical studies that included sufficient detail to determine the odds or risk of EoE (primary outcome) or esophageal eosinophilia (secondary outcome) among individuals exposed to H pylori (exposed) vs individuals who were tested and found to be unexposed. Estimates were pooled using a random-effects model. Meta-regression and sensitivity analyses were planned a priori. Studies were evaluated for quality, risk of bias, publication bias, and heterogeneity. Results: We analyzed 11 observational studies comprising data on 377,795 individuals worldwide. H pylori exposure vs non-exposure was associated with a 37% reduction in odds of EoE (odds ratio [OR], 0.63; 95% CI, 0.51–0.78) and a 38% reduction in odds of esophageal eosinophilia (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.52–0.76). Fewer prospective studies found a significant association between H pylori exposure and EoE ( P =.06) than retrospective studies. Effect estimates were not affected by study location, whether the studies were performed in pediatric or adult populations, time period (before vs after 2007), or prevalence of H pylori in the study population. Conclusions: In a comprehensive meta-analysis, we found evidence for a significant association between H pylori exposure and reduced odds of EoE. Studies are needed to determine the mechanisms of this association.

No abstract

No abstract

Background Gender-based differences are reported in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) pathogenesis, but their impacts on IBD outcomes are not well known. We determined gender-based differences in response to treatment with tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) therapies in individuals with ulcerative colitis (UC). Methods We used the Yale University Open Data Access (YODA) platform to abstract individual participant data from randomized clinical trials to study infliximab and golimumab as induction and maintenance therapies in moderately to severely active UC. Using multivariable logistic regression, we examined associations between gender and the endpoints of clinical remission, mucosal healing, and clinical response for each study individually and in a meta-analysis. Results Of 1639 patients included in induction trials (Program of Ulcerative Colitis Research Studies Utilizing an Investigational Treatment—Subcutaneous [PURSUIT-SC], active ulcerative colitis trials [ACT] 1 and 2) and 1280 patients included in maintenance trials (Program of Ulcerative Colitis Research Studies Utilizing an Investigational Treatment—Maintenance [PURSUIT-IM], ACT 1 and 2), 696 (42.5%) and 534 (41.7%) were women, respectively. In a meta-analysis of induction trials, the adjusted odds ratios (aORs) of clinical remission (aOR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.31–0.97), mucosal healing (aOR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.27–0.83), and clinical response (aOR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.29–0.90) in the treatment arm and of clinical remission in the placebo arm (aOR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.15–0.82) were lower in men compared to women. There were no differences in outcomes by gender in the treatment and placebo arms in the meta-analysis of maintenance trials. Conclusions Men are less likely to achieve clinical remission, mucosal healing, and clinical response compared to women during induction treatment with TNFi for UC, but not during the maintenance phase. Future studies delineating the mechanisms underlying these observations would be informative.

No abstract

Background There are increasing data on sex-based differences in IBD epidemiology, phenotype and outcomes. The purpose of this study was to characterize sex-based differences in response to tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) therapies in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Methods We conducted a pooled analysis of individual-level data from randomized clinical trials (RCTs) on induction therapy with infliximab and golimumab, accessed through the Yale University Open Data Access platform. We analyzed patients in the treatment and placebo arms separately. Using multivariable logistic regression modeling, we compared the primary outcome of clinical remission, and secondary outcomes of clinical response and mucosal healing, according to clinical trial definitions, between male and female patients with UC at week 6 (golimumab) or week 8 (infliximab) of induction therapy. Effect estimates were expressed as adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results We included 1639 patients (696, 42.5% were women, Table) from two trials using infliximab (ACT-1 and 2) and one trial using golimumab (PURSUIT). Male patients were older than female patients in the treatment arm of the overall cohort [mean age (standard deviation) 31.31 (16.53) years and 29.34 (15.19) years, respectively). All other baseline characteristics, such as sex, race, Mayo score at screening, and concomitant systemic corticosteroid and immunomodulator use were comparable. Compared to female patients, male patients were significantly less likely to achieve clinical remission in both treatment and placebo arms (aOR 0.55, 95% CI 0.31, 0.97 and 0.34, 95% CI 0.15, 0.82, respectively, Figure). Compared to female patients, male patients were significantly less likely to achieve mucosal healing and clinical response in the treatment arm (aOR 0.47, 95% CI 0.27, 0.83 and 0.51, 95% CI 0.29, 0.90, respectively), but there was no significant difference in these secondary outcomes by sex in the placebo arm. Conclusion Based on this analysis of pooled data from RCTs, we demonstrate that clinical remission, response and mucosal healing with TNFi induction therapies are less likely in male patients compared to female patients with UC. Clinical remission is also less likely in male patients on placebo. These finding may lead to further research on sex-based differences in treatment outcomes, including mechanistic studies.

A low serum bicarbonate (SB) level is predictive of adverse outcomes in kidney injury, infection, and aging. Because the liver plays an important role in acid-base homeostasis and lactic acid metabolism, we speculated that such a relationship would exist for patients with cirrhosis. To assess the prognostic value of admission SB on adverse hospital outcomes, clinical characteristics were extracted and analyzed from a large electronic health record system. Patients were categorized based on admission SB (mEq/L) into 7 groups based on the reference range (22–25) into mildly (18–21), moderately (14–17), and severely (<14) decreased groups and mildly (26–29), moderately (30–33), and severely (>30) increased groups, and the relationship of SB category with the frequency of complications (acute kidney injury/hepatorenal syndrome, portosystemic encephalopathy, gastrointestinal bleeding, ascites, and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis) and hospital metrics (length of stay [LOS], admission to an intensive care unit [ICU], and mortality) was assessed. A total of 2,693 patients were analyzed. Mean SB was 22.9 ± 4.5 mEq/L. SB was within the normal range (22–25 mEq/L) in 1,072 (39.8%) patients, and 955 patients (36%) had a low SB. As the SB category decreased, the incidence of complications progressively increased ( p < 0.001 ). Increased MELD-Na score and low serum albumin also correlated with frequency of complications ( p < 0.001 ). As the SB category decreased, LOS, ICU admission, and mortality progressively increased ( p < 0.001 ). On multivariate analysis, the association of decreased SB with higher odds of complications, LOS, ICU admission, and mortality persisted. Conclusion. Low admission SB in patients with cirrhosis is associated with cirrhotic complications, longer LOS, increased ICU admissions, and increased hospital mortality.