Throughout the nineteenth century, political parties attempted to mediate local, state, and national conflicts to forge a winning electoral coalition. The question here is whether party leaders felt that success depended on offering clear divergent positions to their voters. In other words, to what extent did the parties present alternative programs to the electorate—at any specific time or over time? This study examines the growth of the two-party system in nineteenth-century America by focusing on the interaction of the elites of the Democrats and Whig/Republicans in forging their electoral message. The methodology includes a content analysis of national and state party platforms during presidential election years 1840 through 1896 to show when and where parties emphasized certain issue proposals. Ultimately, this is a story of interparty polarization—over time, the two major parties tended to emphasize the same issues and offer divergent positions in their platforms.
Furthermore, the enforcement of gun control laws is challenged by ideology and worldviews. Firearms owners reject state regulations of their firearms on principle-because they believe that their right to self-defense should not be subject to any state-imposed restrictions. Local law enforcement, especially outside major urban centers, share the same ideology and have refused to enforce many provisions of the SAFE Act. The list goes on, and it is not pretty outside of political pronouncements and press releases. Not only do we have an ineffective patchwork of laws, some of which are not enforceable, but it is all but impossible to assess the effectiveness of new regulations given the openness of the American marketplace. The book's "no-nonsense" cataloging of glaring problems with the country's gun regulation system opens up numerous questions of interest to political scientists. Through the lens of gun policy, we can discuss issues of state capacity, political values and culture, temporal political incentives, federalism, and the role of courts. Students of public policy have a great basis for theory development in this realistic portrayal of the major limitations of our gun regulatory system.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.