In the largest single-center report of recurrent HCC following LT, surgical treatment in well-selected patients is associated with significantly improved survival and should be pursued. A risk score model accurately stratifies prognostic subgroups, and may help guide treatment strategies.

Direct‐acting antiviral (DAA) therapy has altered the frequency and outcome of liver transplantation (LT) for hepatitis C virus (HCV). The high efficacy and tolerability of DAA therapy has also created a rationale for utilizing HCV‐viremic (HCV‐RNA–positive) donors, including into HCV‐negative recipients. We examined trends in frequency of organ utilization and graft survival in recipients of HCV‐viremic donors (HCV‐RNA positive as measured by nucleic acid testing [NAT]). Data were collected from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) on adult patients who underwent a primary, single‐organ, deceased donor LT from January 1, 2008 to January 31, 2018. Outcomes of HCV‐negative transplant recipients (R–) who received an allograft from donors who were HCV‐RNA positive (DNAT+) were compared to outcomes for R– patients who received organs from donors who were HCV‐RNA negative (DNAT–). There were 11,270 DNAT–/R–; 4,748 DNAT–/R+; 87 DNAT+/R–; and 753 DNAT+/R+ patients, with 2‐year graft survival similar across all groups: DNAT–/R– 88%; DNAT–/R+ 88%; DNAT+/R– 86%; and DNAT+/R+ 90%. Additionally, there were 2,635 LTs using HCV antibody‐positive donors (DAb+): 2,378 DAb+/R+ and 257 DAb+/R–. The annual number of DAb+/R– transplants increased from seven in 2008 to 107 in 2017. In the post‐DAA era, graft survival improved for all recipients, with 3‐year survival of DAb+/R– patients and DAb+/R+ patients increasing to 88% from 79% and to 85% from 78%, respectively. Conclusion: The post‐DAA era has seen increased utilization of HCV‐viremic donor livers, including HCV‐viremic livers into HCV‐negative recipients. Early graft outcomes are similar to those of HCV‐negative recipients. These results support utilization of HCV‐viremic organs in selected recipients both with and without HCV infection.

Liver transplantation was made a reality through the bravery, innovation, and persistence of Dr. Thomas Starzl. His death in 2017, at the age of 90, makes us pause to consider how far the field has come since its inception by this remarkable pioneer. It also is an opportunity to evaluate the continued novel innovations which contribute to the growth and potential for liver transplantation in the future. The liver transplant community in 2017 continued to be most significantly challenged by an overwhelming disparity between the need for liver transplant and the shortage of donor organs. The many ways in which this critical shortage are being addressed are examined in this article. The continued debate about equitable and efficacious organ allocation, "the liver wars," has dominated much of the recent past, while efforts to optimize current organ availability have also been aggressively pursued. Efforts to optimize the use of marginal and expanded criteria organs have escalated in recent years and have been accompanied by rigorous scientific evaluation. The ongoing opioid epidemic, combined with the approval and availability of highly effective hepatitis C treatment options, has allowed the increased use of HCV positive organs in HCV positive and negative recipients. Machine perfusion, both cold and warm, has moved solidly into the liver transplant world potentiating optimization of marginal donors and also offering potential modulation of liver grafts (ie, gene therapy, stem cell therapy, and defatting). Finally, pharmacological and mechanical interventions in DCD procurement techniques have contributed to improved outcomes in DCD transplants. All of these are explored in this article as a tribute to innovative spirit of Dr. Starzl and his continued impact on liver transplant today.

Highly effective direct‐acting antiviral (DAA) therapy has transformed outcomes of liver transplantation in hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients. We examined longer‐term outcomes in HCV‐positive recipients in the DAA era and analyzed the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients for primary adult, single‐organ, nonfulminant liver transplant recipients in the United States from January 1, 2008 to June 30, 2018. Graft loss was compared among HCV‐positive liver transplant recipients who received either an HCV‐negative or HCV‐positive donor (donor [D]–/recipient [R]+; D+/R+) and HCV‐negative liver transplant recipients who received a HCV‐negative donor (D–/R–). The groups were further divided between the pre‐DAA and DAA eras. There were 52,526 patients included: 31,193 were D–/R– patients; 18,746 were D–/R+ patients; and 2587 were D+/R+ patients. The number of D–/R+ transplants decreased from 2010 in 2008 to 1334 in 2017, with this decline particularly noticeable since 2015. D–/R+ patients in the DAA era (n = 7107) were older, had higher rates of hepatocellular carcinoma, and lower Model for End‐Stage Liver Disease scores than those in the pre‐DAA era. Graft survival improved for all recipients in the DAA era but improved most dramatically in HCV‐positive recipients: D–/R+ 1‐year survival was 92.4% versus 88.7% and 3‐year survival was 83.7% versus 77.7% (DAA versus pre‐DAA era, respectively) compared with D–/R– 1‐year survival of 92.7% versus 91.0% and 3‐year survival of 85.7% versus 84.0% (DAA versus pre‐DAA era, respectively). The magnitude of improvement in 3‐year graft survival was almost 4‐fold greater for D–/R+ patients. The 3‐year survival for D+/R+ patients was similar to HCV‐negative patients. In conclusion, the number of liver transplants for HCV has decreased by more than one‐third over the past decade. Graft survival among HCV‐positive recipients has increased disproportionately in the DAA era with HCV‐positive recipients now achieving similar outcomes to non‐HCV recipients.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains a common and lethal malignancy worldwide and arises in the setting of a host of diseases. The incidence continues to increase despite multiple vaccines and therapies for viruses such as the hepatitis B and C viruses. In addition, due to the growing incidence of obesity in Western society, there is anticipation that there will be a growing population with HCC due to non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Due to the growing frequency of this disease, screening is recommended using ultrasound with further imaging using magnetic resonance imaging and multi-detector computed tomography used for further characterization of masses. Great advances have been made to help with the early diagnosis of small lesions leading to potential curative resection or transplantation. Resection and transplantation maybe used in a variety of patients that are carefully selected based on underlying liver disease. Using certain guidelines and clinical acumen patients may have good outcomes with either resection or transplantation however many patients are inoperable at time of presentation. Fortunately, the use of new locoregional therapies has made down staging patients a potential option making them potential surgical candidates. Despite a growing population with HCC, new advances in viral therapies, chemotherapeutics, and an expanding population of surgical and transplant candidates might all contribute to improved long-term survival of these patients.