We retrospectively assessed breakthrough invasive fungal infections (b-IFIs) in 100 consecutive patients with leukemia receiving single-agent isavuconazole; 13 had documented b-IFIs (candidiasis in 6, mucormycosis in 4). All b-IFIs were observed in patients with prolonged neutropenia and active leukemia.

Treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) that is resistant to endocrine therapy presents a significant clinical challenge. The well-known role of cell cycle dysregulation in these patients is partly mediated by cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) activity. Specific cyclin and CDK complexes regulate cell cycle progression by managing the transition through the cell cycle, and inhibition of CDKs represents an important target for novel agents. First-generation CDK inhibitors (e.g., flavopiridol) were relatively nonselective and had an unacceptable toxicity profile in early trials. Second-generation CDK inhibitors were designed to target the CDK4 and CDK6 (CDK4/6) pathway and have shown promising clinical activity with an acceptable toxicity profile in patients with MBC. Palbociclib is a first-in-class CDK4/6 inhibitor that was granted accelerated U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval in combination with letrozole for the treatment of MBC in the first-line setting (February 2015) as well as in combination with fulvestrant for MBC that had progressed on previous endocrine therapy (February 2016). Other CDK4/6 inhibitors, including ribociclib and abemaciclib, are under investigation as monotherapy and in combination with endocrine or anti-human epidermal growth receptor 2 therapy for the treatment of MBC. Ongoing clinical trials should provide additional information to guide the appropriate use of these agents and identify patient populations that could derive the most benefit.

Background Venetoclax (VEN) combined with the hypomethylating agent (HMA) azacitidine improves survival in patients aged ≥75 years with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). VEN and HMA treatment can result in prolonged and often profound neutropenia, and this warrants antifungal prophylaxis. Azole antifungals inhibit cytochrome P450 3A4, the primary enzyme responsible for VEN metabolism; this results in VEN dose reductions for each concomitant antifungal. Limited clinical data exist on outcomes for patients treated with VEN, an HMA, and various azoles. Methods The time to neutrophil recovery (absolute neutrophil count [ANC] > 1000 cells/mm3) and platelet (PLT) recovery (PLT count > 100,000 cells/mm3) in 64 patients with newly diagnosed AML who achieved a response after course 1 of VEN plus an HMA were evaluated. HMA therapy included azacitidine (75 mg/m2 intravenously/subcutaneously for 7 days) or decitabine (20 mg/m2 intravenously for 5 or 10 days). Results Forty‐seven patients (73%) received an azole: posaconazole (n = 17; 27%), voriconazole (n = 9; 14%), isavuconazole (n = 20; 31%), or fluconazole (n = 1; 2%). The median time to ANC recovery were similar for patients who did receive an azole (37 days; 95% confidence interval [CI], 34‐38 days) and patients who did not receive an azole (39 days; 95% CI, 30 days to not estimable; P = .8). The median time to PLT recovery was significantly longer for patients receiving azoles (28 vs 22 days; P = .01). The median times to ANC recovery (35 vs 38 days) and PLT recovery (26 vs 32 days) were similar with posaconazole and voriconazole. Conclusions VEN plus an HMA resulted in neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, with the latter prolonged in patients receiving concomitant azoles. Concomitant posaconazole or voriconazole and VEN (100 mg) resulted in similar ANC and PLT recovery times, suggesting the safety of these dosage combinations during course 1.

For enterococcal bacteremia, a daptomycin fAUC/MIC >27.43 was associated with 30-day survival among low-acuity patients. As pharmacodynamics for the approved dose are optimized only when MIC ≤1 mg/L, these data continue to stress the importance of re-evaluation of the current susceptibility breakpoint.

Background Multiple factors influence the choice of primary antifungal prophylaxis (PAP) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) undergoing remission induction chemotherapy (RIC) given the recent incorporation of targeted leukemia therapies into these regimens. Methods We evaluated the incidence and characteristics of breakthrough IFI (bIFI) in 277 adult patients with newly diagnosed AML undergoing RIC with high-intensity, or low-intensity venetoclax-containing therapy. Patients receiving posaconazole (PCZ), voriconazole (VCZ), or isavuconazole (ISA) for > 5 days as PAP during RIC were included. Echinocandin use prior to, but not concomitantly with, the PAP azole was allowed. IFI (modified EORTC/MSG criteria) occurring after > 5 days of continuous azole exposure or within 14 days of discontinuation were considered bIFI. Results Proven or probable bIFI were observed in 11 patients (4%). The incidence of bIFI was 2.9% for PCZ, 4.8% for VCZ, and 5.7% for ISA (p=0.55). 161 patients (58%) received echinocandin prophylaxis prior to azole initiation. Neither echinocandin exposure nor chemotherapy intensity impacted bIFI rate. Patients with bIFI had a lower rate of absolute neutrophil count recovery >1000 cells/µL (64% vs 90%, p=0.021) or complete remission (CR; 18% vs 66%, p=0.002) after RIC. Thirty-eight patients (14%) discontinued PAP due to toxicity, most often hepatotoxicity. Discontinuation due to hepatotoxicity was similar among azoles (PCZ: 13%; VCZ: 15%; ISA: 13%). Conclusions The rate of bIFI is low during RIC in patients with newly diagnosed AML receiving any of the mold-active triazoles as PAP. Neutrophil recovery and achievement of CR are important for bIFI risk.