Cancer treatments have evolved from indiscriminate cytotoxic agents to selective genome- and immune-targeted drugs that have transformed outcomes for some malignancies. 1 Tumor complexity and heterogeneity suggest that the “precision medicine” paradigm of cancer therapy requires treatment to be personalized to the individual patient. 2 – 6 To date, precision oncology trials have been based upon molecular matching with predetermined monotherapies. 7 – 14 Several of these trials have been hindered by very low matching rates, often in the 5–10% range, 15 and low response rates. Low matching rates may be due to the use of limited gene panels, restrictive molecular matching algorithms, lack of drug availability or the deterioration and death of end-stage patients before therapy can be implemented. We hypothesized that personalized treatment with combination therapies would improve outcomes in patients with refractory malignancies. As a first test of this concept, we implemented a cross-institutional, prospective study (I-PREDICT, ) that used tumor DNA sequencing and timely recommendations for individualized treatment with combination therapies. We found that administration of customized multi-drug regimens was feasible, with 49% of consented patients receiving personalized treatment. Targeting of a larger fraction of identified molecular alterations, yielding a higher “matching score,” was correlated with significantly improved disease control rates, as well as longer progression-free and overall survival rates, as compared to when fewer somatic alterations were targeted. Our findings suggest that the current clinical trial paradigm for precision oncology, which pairs one driver mutation with one drug, may be optimized by treating molecularly complex and heterogeneous cancers with combinations of customized agents.

ObjectiveTo define the neuropathology, clinical phenotype, autonomic physiology and differentiating features in individuals with neuropathic and non-neuropathic postural tachycardia syndrome (POTS).MethodsTwenty-four subjects with POTS and 10 healthy control subjects had skin biopsy analysis of intra-epidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD), quantitative sensory testing (QST) and autonomic testing. Subjects completed quality of life, fatigue and disability questionnaires. Subjects were divided into neuropathic and non-neuropathic POTS, defined by abnormal IENFD and abnormal small fiber and sudomotor function. ResultsNine of 24 subjects had neuropathic POTS and had significantly lower resting and tilted heart rates; reduced parasympathetic function; and lower phase 4 valsalva maneuver overshoot compared with those with non-neuropathic POTS (P<0.05). Neuropathic POTS subjects also had less anxiety and depression and greater overall self-perceived health-related quality of life scores than non-neuropathic POTS subjects. A sub-group of POTS patients (cholinergic POTS) had abnormal proximal sudomotor function and symptoms that suggest gastrointestinal and genitourinary parasympathetic nervous system dysfunction. Conclusions and RelevancePOTS subtypes may be distinguished using small fiber and autonomic structural and functional criteria. Patients with non-neuropathic POTS have greater anxiety, greater depression and lower health-related quality of life scores compared to those with neuropathic POTS. These findings suggest different pathophysiological processes underlie the postural tachycardia in neuropathic and non-neuropathic POTS patients. The findings have implications for the therapeutic interventions to treat this disorder.

Purpose Amplifications of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKS) are therapeutic targets in multiple tumor types (e.g. HER2 in breast cancer), and amplification of the chromosome 4 segment harboring the three RTKs KIT, PDGFRA, and KDR (4q12amp) may be similarly targetable. The presence of 4q12amp has been sporadically reported in small tumor specific series but a large‐scale analysis is lacking. We assess the pan‐cancer landscape of 4q12amp and provide early clinical support for the feasibility of targeting this amplicon. Experimental Design Tumor specimens from 132,872 patients with advanced cancer were assayed with hybrid capture based comprehensive genomic profiling which assays 186–315 genes for all classes of genomic alterations, including amplifications. Baseline demographic data were abstracted, and presence of 4q12amp was defined as 6 or more copies of KIT/KDR/PDGFRA. Concurrent alterations and treatment outcomes with matched therapies were explored in a subset of cases. Results Overall 0.65% of cases harbored 4q12amp at a median copy number of 10 (range 6–344). Among cancers with >100 cases in this series, glioblastomas, angiosarcomas, and osteosarcomas were enriched for 4q12amp at 4.7%, 4.8%, and 6.4%, respectively (all p < 0.001), giving an overall sarcoma (n = 6,885) incidence of 1.9%. Among 99 pulmonary adenocarcinoma cases harboring 4q12amp, 50 (50%) lacked any other known driver of NSLCC. Four index cases plus a previously reported case on treatment with empirical TKIs monotherapy had stable disease on average exceeding 20 months. Conclusion We define 4q12amp as a significant event across the pan‐cancer landscape, comparable to known pan‐cancer targets such as NTRK and microsatellite instability, with notable enrichment in several cancers such as osteosarcoma where standard treatment is limited. The responses to available TKIs observed in index cases strongly suggest 4q12amp is a druggable oncogenic target across cancers that warrants a focused drug development strategy. Implications for Practice Coamplification of the receptor tyrosine kinases (rtks) KIT/KDR/PDGFRA (4q12amp) is present broadly across cancers (0.65%), with enrichment in osteosarcoma and gliomas. Evidence for this amplicon having an oncogenic role is the mutual exclusivity of 4q12amp to other known drivers in 50% of pulmonary adenocarcinoma cases. Furthermore, preliminary clinical evidence for driver status comes from four index cases of patients empirically treated with commercially available tyrosine kinase inhibitors with activity against KIT/KDR/PDGFRA who had stable disease for 20 months on average. The sum of these lines of evidence suggests further clinical and preclinical investigation of 4q12amp is warranted as the possible basis for a pan‐cancer drug development strategy.

2512 Background: Precision medicine has been studied in patients (pts) with advanced, heavily-treated cancers by administering molecularly matched monotherapies. With increasing availability of large gene assays and cognate agents, we hypothesized that offering customized combination therapies to treatment-naïve tumors would be feasible and improve response rates. Methods: Investigation of Profile-Related Evidence Determining Individualized Cancer Therapy (I-PREDICT, NCT02534675) targeted metastatic and/or unresectable, untreated lethal cancers ( > 50% 2-yr mortality). Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP, Foundation Medicine; 315 genes), and, if possible, PD-(L)1 IHC, tumor mutational burden (TMB) and circulating tumor DNA were performed. A molecular tumor board discussed results immediately upon receipt, and emphasized customized combinations. Final decisions were the treating physician’s choice. Results: CGP was evaluable in 40/47 treatment-naïve pts (85.1%); 22 (46.8%) were treated [17 matched (36.2%); 5 unmatched (10.6%); 11 different diagnoses). The other 25 pts (53.2%) are awaiting therapy (8, 17%) or could not be treated (17, 36.2%), mainly due to patient deterioration or payor limitations. Each tumor had a unique genomic portfolio. The median (range) of genomic alterations/patient was 5 (1-12). TMB was available in 17 pts (12 low; 4 intermediate; 1 high). The median (range) Matching Score [(matches (#)/characterized genomic alterations (#)] was 33% (14-100%; 100% designated immunotherapy match or all alterations matched to targeted agents) [Reference PMID 2719717]. Nine/17 matched pts (53%) achieved SD > 6 months (N = 2) or CR (1)/PR (6). The median progression-free survival (PFS) for matched vs. unmatched pts was 4.7 vs. 1.0 months ( P= 0.0019). There were no drug-related deaths. Conclusions: With the use of broad-based DNA sequencing assays, inclusion of pts earlier in their disease course, timely mandated molecular tumor board discussions, and increasing availability of cognate drugs for customized combinations, we report: 1) high molecular matching rates (~36%); 2) high rates of SD > 6 months/CR/PR (~53%); and 3) improved PFS. Study expansion is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT0253467.