The Corona virus outbreak changes life habits, interaction patterns and people's behavior. The impact is very large and massive, not only targeting the health aspects but also the economic, psychological, social, political, educational, cultural, religious, etc, so that it needs to deal with proper government policies. The article uses a qualitative method with a case study approach that concentrates on the dynamics that occur in society after the implementation of policies related to COVID-19. Methods of data collection through observation, interviews, and content analysis of online media publications. The focus of the study is government policy, community response, and the events that follow after the policy was implemented in the period March to August 2020 in Kendari City. The results show that after the implementation of the policy to prevent the spread of COVID-19, there will be dynamics and noise in the community. The noise, panic, and stress were triggered by 3 things, first, the Mayor of Kendari's instruction that prohibited Kendari City residents from doing activities outside their home for 3 consecutive days without clear social security; second, the issue of the arrival of foreign workers from China, and third, the patient suspected of being infected with Corona escaped from the hospital isolation room. Public response to controversial government policies has ranged from non-compliance, violating health protocol rules, to anxiety and uproar in the community. In order not to cause uproar and controversy, government policies should be made to answer needs, solve problems, and improve the welfare of society.
Background: The lack of the Poor's accessibility to the healthcare service is still become a problem that difficult to resolve. In practice, they still face obstacles that hinder their accessibility to the healthcare service. Objective: The study aims to describe factors affect to healthcare service access and Poor's decision to use healthcare service. This study uses a qualitative method. Meanwhile, data collection uses in-depth interview, observation and document study. Data analysis steps consist of data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing and verification. Result: Factors affect to healthcare service access consist of infrastructure is an unlock of health access, transportation facilities to support health access, geographical conditions become the determinants of access to health, health costs as healthcare capital and socio-cultural matter. Meanwhile, Poor's decision to use healthcare service is driven by external and internal factors. External factors consist of healthcare service systems (such as national policies on health, resources or health personnel) and political and economic conditions. Internal factors such as the Poor's characteristic factors consist of demographic, knowledge, belief, income, cost, transportation, health complaints, and health condition factors consist of health status and satisfaction on healthcare service.
The purpose of this study is to explain the bureaucratic culture of state civil servants in the implementation of a national health insurance policy for the poor people in Indonesia. This study used qualitative research methods. Meanwhile, data collection used in-depth interviews, observation, and document study. Data analysis consists of data reduction, data display, conclusions drawing, and verification. The results of this study indicate that the performance of the state civil servants in implementing health insurance still has bureaucratic culture: pragmatic concerning the interests of the Government, bureaucratic in the mechanism for submitting the participation of contribution assistance recipients (beneficiaries), rigidity in the interaction of work tasks, non-participation in the data collection process for the contribution assistance recipients and short-term orientation in achieving membership targets. Therefore, the government must change the mindset of the behavior of the bureaucracy by transforming bureaucratic culture through learning in change management.
Artikel ini bertujuan membandingkan beberapa model intervensi komunitas dalam praktik makro pekerjaan sosial. Metode yang digunakan adalah studi literatur, yaitu dengan mengumpulkan dan menganalisis data dari beberapa sumber buku dan jurnal yang terkait dengan model intervensi komunitas atau pengembangan masyarakat, kemudian memberikan beberapa kesimpulan dan rekomendasi. Studi ini menunjukkan bahwa masalah-masalah yang dialami masyarakat di negara-negara berkembang, termasuk Indonesia adalah masalah-masalah yang bersifat sosial ekonomi dibandingkan dengan masalah-masalah psikologis. Sebagai alternatif telah dikembangkan pekerjaan sosial yang berorientasi pada pembangunan. Terdapat berbagai model intervensi komunitas, antara lain: (1) model Rothman, (2) model Glen, serta (3) model Netting, Kettner, dan McMurty. Dalam praktiknya, ketiga model intervensi komunitas ini dapat dilakukan bersamaan karena bersifat saling melengkapi antara model yang satu dengan model yang lainnya. Berbagai model intervensi komunitas tersebut merupakan konsep penting yang perlu dipahami dan dipraktikkan dalam setting makro pekerjaan sosial, yakni di level masyarakat lokal. Studi ini merekomendasikan tentang perlunya dilakukan penelitian yang mendalam berkaitan dengan perbandingan model intervensi komunitas yang dapat menghasilkan pengetahuan yang membumi (indigenous knowledge) dalam konteks lokal masyarakat Indonesia sebagai landasan ilmiah untuk dikembangan dan dapat diaplikasikan (applicable) guna kepentingan para pemangku kepentingan (stakeholders), yaitu masyarakat lokal, pemerintah, akademisi atau peneliti, lembaga swadaya masyarakat, serta dunia usaha dan dunia industri.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.