Although often successful in acute settings, long-term use of opioid pain medications may be accompanied by waning levels of analgesic response not readily attributable to advancing underlying disease, necessitating dose escalation to attain pain relief. Analgesic tolerance, and more recently opioid-induced hyperalgesia, have been invoked to explain such declines in opioid effectiveness over time. Because both phenomena result in inadequate analgesia, they are difficult to distinguish in a clinical setting. Patients with otherwise uncomplicated low-back pain were titrated to comfort or dose-limiting side effects in a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial using sustained-release morphine or weight-matched placebo capsules for 1 month. A total of 103 patients completed the study, with an average end titration dose of 78 mg morphine/d. After 1 month, the morphine-treated patients developed tolerance to the analgesic effects of remifentanil, but did not develop opioid-induced hyperalgesia. On average, these patients experienced a 42% reduction in analgesic potency. The morphine-treated patients experienced clinically relevant improvements in pain relief, as shown by a 44% reduction in average visual analogue scale pain levels and a 31% improvement in functional ability. The differences in visual analogue scale pain levels (P = .003) and self-reported disability (P = .03) between both treatment groups were statistically significant. After 1 month of oral morphine therapy, patients with chronic low-back pain developed tolerance but not opioid-induced hyperalgesia. Improvements in pain and functional ability were observed.

No abstract

Acute and chronic exposure to opioids has been associated with hyperalgesia in both animals and humans. A genetic analysis of opioid-induced hyperalgesia in mice linked the β(2)-adrenergic receptor to mechanical sensitization after opioid exposure. In humans, expansion of the area of mechanical hyperalgesia surrounding an experimentally induced lesion after the cessation of remifentanil infusion is a commonly used model of opioid hyperalgesia (remifentanil-induced postinfusion hyperalgesia, RPH). The purpose of our translational study was to test the hypothesis that the β-adrenergic receptor antagonist propranolol modulates the expression of RPH in humans. This double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study was performed in 10 healthy human volunteers. During test sessions, intracutaneous electrical stimulation was used to generate areas of secondary mechanical hyperalgesia. The area of this sensitization was measured before, during, and after remifentanil infusion. Heat pain sensitivity was also followed. During one test session, subjects received propranolol infusion. We observed an average increase in the areas of secondary mechanical hyperalgesia to 141% of the baseline in subjects infused with remifentanil and placebo (P=0.00040). However, when remifentanil infusion was combined with propranolol, the area of secondary hyperalgesia after terminating remifentanil was not significantly different than the area before beginning the opioid infusion (P=0.13). Thermal hyperalgesia was not observed after remifentanil infusion. Propranolol infusion at the selected dose had minor hemodynamic effects. Concomitant infusion of propranolol with remifentanil prevented the expression of RPH. β-adrenergic receptor blockade may be a useful pharmacological strategy for preventing hyperalgesia in patients exposed to opioids.

BackgroundImmunotherapy with anti-disialoganglioside dinutuximab has improved survival for children with high-risk neuroblastoma (NB) when given after induction chemotherapy and surgery. However, disease recurrence and resistance persist. Dinutuximab efficacy has not been evaluated when initiated before primary tumor removal. Using a surgical mouse model of human NB, we examined if initiating dinutuximab plus ex vivo-activated natural killer (aNK) cells before resection of the primary tumor improves survival.MethodsIn vitro, human NB cells (SMS-KCNR-Fluc, CHLA-255-Fluc) were treated with dinutuximab and/or aNK cells and cytotoxicity was measured. In vivo, NB cells (SMS-KCNR-Fluc, CHLA-255-Fluc, or COG-N-415x PDX) were injected into the kidney of NOD-scid gamma mice. Mice received eight intravenous infusions of aNK cells plus dinutuximab beginning either 12 days before or 2 days after resection of primary tumors. Tumors in control mice were treated by resection alone or with immunotherapy alone. Disease was quantified by bioluminescent imaging and survival was monitored. aNK cell infiltration into primary tumors was quantified by flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry at varying timepoints.ResultsIn vitro, aNK cells and dinutuximab were more cytotoxic than either treatment alone. In vivo, treatment with aNK cells plus dinutuximab prior to resection of the primary tumor was most effective in limiting metastatic disease and prolonging survival. aNK cell infiltration into xenograft tumors was observed after 1 day and peaked at 5 days following injection.ConclusionDinutuximab plus aNK cell immunotherapy initiated before resection of primary tumors decreases disease burden and prolongs survival in an experimental mouse model of NB. These findings support the clinical investigation of this treatment strategy during induction therapy in patients with high-risk NB.

BACKGROUND: Optimal management of neutropenic appendicitis (NA) in children undergoing cancer therapy remains undefined. Management strategies include upfront appendectomy or initial nonoperative management. We aimed to characterize the effect of management strategy on complications and length of stay (LOS) and describe implications for chemotherapy delay or alteration.METHODS: Sites from the Pediatric Surgery Oncology Research Collaborative performed a retrospective review of children with NA over a 6-year period.RESULTS: Sixty-six children, with a median age of 11 years (range 1-17), were identified with NA while undergoing cancer treatment. The most common cancer diagnoses were leukemia (62%) and brain tumor (12%). Upfront appendectomy was performed in 41% of patients; the remainder had initial nonoperative management. Rates of abscess or perforation at diagnosis were equivalent in the groups (30% vs 24%; P = .23). Of patients who had initial nonoperative management, 46% (17 of 37) underwent delayed appendectomy during the same hospitalization. Delayed appendectomy was due to failure of initial nonoperative management in 65% (n = 11) and count recovery in 35% (n = 6). Cancer therapy was delayed in 35% (n = 23). Initial nonoperative management was associated with a delay in cancer treatment (46% vs. 22%, P = .05) and longer LOS (29 vs 12 days; P = .01). Patients who had initial nonoperative management and delayed appendectomy had a higher rate of postoperative complications (P , .01). CONCLUSIONS:In pediatric patients with NA from oncologic treatment, upfront appendectomy resulted in lower complication rates, reduced LOS, and fewer alterations in chemotherapy regimens compared to initial nonoperative management. WHAT'S KNOWN ON THIS SUBJECT:The optimal management of neutropenic appendicitis in children undergoing cancer therapy remains undefined. Management strategies include upfront appendectomy or initial nonoperative management. There are no accepted consensus guidelines. As a result, there is provider-dependent variation in treatment strategies.WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: In this largest sample to date of pediatric patients with appendicitis and neutropenia secondary to oncologic treatment, upfront appendectomy was associated with lower complication rates, reduced lengths of stay, and fewer alterations in chemotherapy regimens, as compared to upfront nonoperative management.