ObjectivesThe present study tested the hypothesis that recall of receiving physical activity (PA) advice would be associated with higher levels of PA in patients with a diagnosis of colorectal cancer (CRC).SettingColorectal cancer patients who were diagnosed in 2010 or 2011, and had been treated in the English National Health Service (NHS).Participants17 753 respondents completed at least one section of the survey relevant to the current study and after exclusion of 171 with dementia (since results relied on recall), 15 254 had complete data for the current study. 60% were male, 67% were >65 years and 96% were from a white ethnic group.Primary and secondary outcome measuresPatients completed the ‘Living with and Beyond Colorectal Cancer’ Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMS) survey in 2013. The survey included questions on receiving exercise advice/information (‘PA advice’), and the frequency of currently doing at least 30 min of brisk PA per day (‘PA level’: 0, 1–4 or 5–7 days, within the past week; with the top category meeting UK guidelines).ResultsA third of respondents (31%) recalled receiving PA advice. Independent of demographics and treatment, patients who recalled having PA advice were more likely to be currently doing some brisk PA (51% in the advice group vs 42% in the no advice group; OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.60 to 1.90; p<0.001), and more likely to be meeting PA guidelines (25% vs 20%; OR 1.70, CI 1.54 to 1.88; p<0.001).ConclusionsRecalling being given PA advice after a diagnosis of CRC was associated with higher levels of PA. However, less than a third of patients recalled receiving advice. Future research should examine the context in which advice is given and randomised trials are required. However, encouraging clinicians working with patients with CRC to give brief PA advice is warranted and may help improve outcomes for CRC survivors.

BackgroundPhysical activity (PA) is associated with a variety of physical and psychosocial health benefits, but levels of moderate-to-vigorous intensity PA remain low worldwide. Virtual reality (VR) gaming systems involving movement (VR exergames) could be used to engage people in more PA.ObjectiveThis study aimed to synthesize public reviews of popular VR exergames to identify common features that players liked or disliked to inform future VR exergame design.MethodsWe conducted a thematic analysis of 498 reviews of the 29 most popular exergames sold in the top 3 VR marketplaces: Steam (Valve Corporation), Viveport (Valve Corporation), and Oculus (Oculus VR). We categorized reviews as positive and negative as they appeared in the marketplaces and identified the most common themes using an inductive thematic analysis.ResultsThe reviews were often mixed, reporting a wide variety of expectations, preferences, and gaming experiences. Players preferred highly realistic games (eg, closely simulated real-world sport), games that were intuitive (in terms of body movement and controls), and games that provided gradual increases in skill acquisition. Players reported feeling that they reached a high level of exertion when playing and that the immersion distracted them from the intensity of the exercise. Some preferred features included music and social aspects of the games, with multiplayer options to include friends or receive help from experienced players. There were 3 main themes in negative reviews. The first concerned bugs that rendered games frustrating. Second, the quality of graphics had a particularly strong impact on perceived enjoyment. Finally, reviewers disliked when games had overly complex controls and display functions that evoked motion sickness.ConclusionsExergames prove to be a stimulating avenue for players to engage in PA and distract themselves from the negative perceptions of performing exercise. The common negative aspects of VR exergames should be addressed for increased uptake and continued engagement.

Over 34,000 questionnaires were used to study occurrence and consultations for back pain in the community. The 12-month period prevalence was 24% and 13% of the sample consulted a doctor. Elderly women were at greatest risk of back pain. The consultation rate increased in both sexes throughout middle age, but declined in men over the age of 55 yr. Back pain was associated with the Goldberg General Health Health Questionnaire score suggesting psychiatric morbidity [odds ratio (OR) = 2.05; confidence interval (CI) 1.89-2.23], obesity (OR = 1.59; CI 1.40-1.79), and cigarette smoking (OR = 1.52; CI 1.36-1.70). Vigorous daily activity was positively associated with back pain in men aged 18-39 yr (OR = 1.37; CI 1.02-1.85), and women aged 18-39 yr (OR = 1.50; CI 1.08-2.09), but was negatively associated with back pain in women aged over 65 yr (OR = 0.35; CI 0.16-0.76). Alcohol consumption was also negatively associated with back pain (OR = 0.72; CI 0.62-0.85). The prevalence of arthritis, constipation and respiratory disorders was increased in those who consulted for back pain corrected for the other variables. Thus back pain was substantially more common in women compared to men over 55 yr. Psychiatric morbidity, cigarette smoking and obesity were associated with back pain at all ages, but the effect of physical exercise appeared to change with age. Further studies are required to explain the sex differences and nature of the associations.

BackgroundThere is a recognized need to include patients in setting research priorities. Research priorities identified by people with a stoma are rarely elicited.ObjectivesTo improve the quality of life of people with a stoma through use of evidence‐based practice based on research priorities set by patients.Design and MethodsOnline pilot survey publicized in 2016 via United Kingdom stoma charities. People ranked nine stoma‐related quality of life topics in order of research priority.ParticipantsPeople 16 years of age and over who currently have or have had a stoma for treatment for any medical condition.AnalysisDistributions of the priority scores for each of the nine research topics were examined. Group differences were explored using either the Mann–Whitney U‐test or the Kruskal–Wallis test depending on the number of groups.ResultsIn total, 225 people completed the survey. The most important research priority was pouch leak problems and stoma bag/appliance problems followed by hernia risk. There were statistically significant differences in ranking research priorities between males and females, age, underlying disease that led to a stoma, stoma type and length of time with a stoma.ConclusionPeople with a stoma are willing to engage in and set research priorities. The results should contribute towards future research about setting the research agenda for the study of stoma‐related concerns that impact quality of life.

Alternative management strategies for localised prostate cancer are required to reduce morbidity and overtreatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, safety and acceptability of exercise training (ET) with behavioural support as a primary therapy for low/intermediate risk localised prostate cancer. Men with low/intermediate-risk prostate cancer were randomised to 12 months of ET or usual care with physical activity advice (UCwA) in a multi-site open label RCT. Feasibility included acceptability, recruitment, retention, adherence, adverse events and disease progression. Secondary outcomes included quality of life and cardiovascular health indices. Of the 50 men randomised to ET (n = 25) or UCwA (n = 25), 92% (n = 46) completed 12 month assessments. Three men progressed to invasive therapy (two in UCwA). In the ET group, men completed mean: 140 mins per week for 12 months (95% CI 129,152 mins) (94% of target dose) at 75% Hrmax. Men in the ET group demonstrated improved body mass (mean reduction: 2.0 kg; 95% CI −2.9,−1.1), reduced systolic (mean: 13 mmHg; 95%CI 7,19) and diastolic blood pressure (mean:8 mmHg; 95% CI 5,12) and improved quality of life (EQ.5D mean:13 points; 95% CI 7,18). There were no serious adverse events. ET in men with low/intermediate risk prostate cancer is feasible and acceptable with a low progression rate to radical treatment. Early signals on clinically relevant markers were found which warrant further investigation.