No abstract

We examined attitudes towards forest and wildlife among Rabha, Bodo and Rajbongshi communities from three villages in the Chakrashila Wildlife Sanctuary of western Assam, India. The study was conducted through open-ended and structured interviews, focus group discussions, and participatory rural appraisal. The respondents identified availability of forest products, biodiversity conservation and the aesthetic beauty of the forest as the major justifications for the establishment of Chakrashila as a protected area. They also believed that people and wildlife could coexist peacefully, although some respondents did not have a cordial relationship with Forest Department staff. Most respondents were favourably disposed towards the golden langur Trachypithecus geei because it did not harm anybody or damage crops, and because of its shining coat and its exalted status in their religious beliefs. They were antagonistic towards the rhesus macaque Macaca mulatta because of its crop-raiding habits, although they were averse to killing it. Most respondents did not want to relocate because they lacked skills and resources and had associations with the forest, where they maintained sacred groves and observed taboos on hunting and plant resource extraction. Thus, the attitudes of the communities were governed not only by their material needs and priorities but also by their deep-rooted cultural–religious bond with the forest. These matters would benefit from being incorporated into forest management strategies in developing countries.

No abstract

1. Pesticide concentrations are correlated with regional declines in stream invertebrate diversity. Experimental studies have identified that pesticides can have strong and persistent negative effects on aquatic ecosystems. These effects may occur at concentrations orders of magnitude lower than laboratory toxicity studies predict.Synergism among stressors is one explanation for observed laboratory-field differences. However, the true effect of pesticides on stream invertebrates remains uncertain, given interactions between stressors and natural environmental conditions. 2. We experimentally examined multiple-stressor effects on stream invertebrate assemblages and leaf litter breakdown using 24 independent ~900 L re-circulating outdoor mesocosms in a semi-orthogonal design. Two pulses of the pesticide malathion (C 10 H 19 O 6 PS 2 ) were delivered at low and high concentrations (Pulse 1: low at 0.1 and high at 1 µg/L; Pulse 2: at 2.5 and 25 µg/L). These were crossed with a treatment combining stressors commonly associated with agricultural development; nitrogen, phosphorus and sediment (kaolinite). Malathion degradation was rapid (<24 hr half-life) in all treatments, likely becauseof photolysis, hydrolysis, the presence of biofilms and sorptive processes. There were significant differences in invertebrate assemblages between treatments, where malathion contributed to 48% and 87% of deviance during Pulse 1 and 2 respectively. Malathion had strong negative effects during Pulse 2, with declines occurring between control and high pesticide treatments in Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera and Trichoptera abundances (Cohen's d = 3.08), invertebrate richness (d = 3.57) and total abundance (d = 3.31). Despite the dominant effects of malathion on invertebrates, agricultural stressorsinhibited rates of leaf litter breakdown (p < 0.05), and weakly mitigated malathion toxicity in mesocosms (e.g. PERMANOVA, P ≈ 0.1). Malathion breakdown analysis indicated sediment addition reduced malathion concentrations through alkaline |

Type II synthetic pyrethroids contain an alpha-cyano group which renders them more neurotoxic than their noncyano type I counterparts. A wide array of biomarkers have been employed to delineate the toxic responses of freshwater fish to various type II synthetic pyrethroids. These include hematological, enzymatic, cytological, genetic, omic and other types of biomarkers. This review puts together the applications of different biomarkers in freshwater fish species in response to the toxicity of the major type II pyrethroid pesticides and assesses their present status, while speculating on the possible future directions.