The objective of this paper is to show how a system composed of many individually designed and manufactured components each with independent descriptive and analytical models of varying definition can be developed and managed by an integrated systems model. Typical engineering design methods require the engineering team to manually coordinate and integrate the engineering domains: electrical, hydraulic, mechanical, software, etc. This effort can take an inordinate amount of time and resources and is rife with errors, which inevitably lead to specification issues. Model-based system engineering (MBSE) is a method used extensively in the military and aerospace industries to reduce component integration and system development time for complex systems. This paper examines methods used to integrate the component models during development of a design for a subsea system. The authors describe the application of a commercially available MBSE toolset extended to integrate with analytical physics based design software. The challenges, advantages, disadvantages, and suggested improvements for integrating the models are explored. The authors discuss how their process supports the domains of system engineering including: requirements, behavior, physical architectures and verification strategies, and how this intimately aligns with the typical engineering domains. Finally, the authors discuss the development of an application programming interface (API) to integrate the models and manage the transfer of data between disparate software tool sets and provide suggestions for future projects of similar complexity. The paper discusses how the methods applied reduce duplicate work and specification errors, achieving a reduction in rework, and ultimately, development time and cost. The MBSE methodology has not typically been applied broadly in energy. This paper highlights a successful deployment of MBSE covering early stages of conceptual design to manufacturing. The API developed to permit seamless integration of multiple systems engineering development tools is unique for this type of application. The interoperability between development tools is highly sought after in the engineering community and enables many advanced capabilities for development teams. Some of these capabilities include: end-to-end traceability, automated model development, automated design verification, and automated document generation and design specification.
The objective of this paper is to highlight the Systems Engineering (SE) processes leveraged on a subsea BOP project. This paper focuses on aspects of Verification, Certification and Qualification and Safety. Key discussions include essential elements of SE and how they were leveraged and tailored to align with program constraints and success criteria to achieve successful deployment of the subsea BOP pilot system. With capital expenditures anticipated to fall more than 10% in 2020, employing SE methodologies is shown to reduce development costs while elevating product quality, reliability, and safety.
This paper discusses the lessons learned from transforming upstream operational requirements from a document environment into a requirements management tool (database). Operations requirements from upstream practices, procedures, specifications, and guides were migrated from a document centric environment into a requirements management system (data centric). Here, requirements were assigned attributes denoting the organization and accountable operational role that requirement. Many organizations, operating complex offshore procedures, especially where operations are highly regulated, are looking to move their operational requirements from a document centric environment to a data centric environment. This paper highlights some potential pitfalls and mitigation strategies for ensuring a successful migration.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.