Although the majority of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia do well with treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), some patients still have inferior outcomes. There are many factors that might play a part, including the different BCR-ABL1 transcript types at baseline. The current study was performed to determine the possible impact of different transcripts on the treatment responses and outcomes of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia who are receiving TKI therapy. The authors performed a systematic literature search by using the terms "b2a2/b3a2," "e13a2/e14a2," or "transcript type." e14a2 was the more common transcript type. The majority of the studies demonstrated no significant difference regarding age, sex, leukocyte counts, and hemoglobin levels between patients with the e13a2 and e14a2 transcripts. However, in approximately one-half of the studies, the e14a2 transcript was associated with higher platelet counts. Almost no studies demonstrated a significant association between disease risk scores and transcript types. In the majority of studies, having the e14a2 transcript was associated with earlier, deeper, and higher molecular response rates. Although better event-free survival was observed in patients with the e14a2 transcript in some of the studies, the majority demonstrated that transcript type did not have an impact on progression-free and overall survival. Treatment-free remission currently is a topic of much interest, and to the authors' knowledge there are limited data with conflicting results regarding the possible effects of transcript types on the outcomes of patients after discontinuation of TKIs. Because having the e14a2 transcript appears to be related to a favorable outcome, choosing second-generation TKIs for frontline therapy might be a convenient approach in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia with the e13a2 transcript. The authors believe this finding warrants further investigation.
Since the introduction of imatinib, the management of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) has changed considerably. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the mainstay of CML treatment; however, the high financial burden of TKIs can be problematic for both the patients and health care systems. After the emergence of generics, reimbursement policies of many countries have changed, and generics offered an alternative treatment option for CML patients. There are many papers published on the use of generics in CML patients with conflicting results regarding both efficacy and safety. In this paper, we systematically reviewed the current literature on generic imatinib use in CML, and 36 papers were evaluated. Both in vitro and in vivo studies of generic imatinib showed comparable results with branded imatinib in terms of bioequivalence and bioavailability. In most studies, generics were comparable with the original molecule in terms of efficacy and safety, both in newly diagnosed patients and after switching from Gleevec. Some generic studies showed contradictory findings regarding efficacy and toxicity, and these differences can be attributed to some factors including the use of different generics in different countries. Both in hypothetical models and in real life, introduction of generic imatinib caused significant reduction in health care costs. In conclusion, generics are not inferior to original imatinib in terms of efficacy with an acceptable toxicity profile. Notwithstanding the generally favorable efficacy and safety of generics worldwide to date, we most probably still need more time to draw firmer conclusions on the longer-term outcomes of generics.
Background: Therapy-related leukemia is a well-recognized clinical syndrome. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is a modern therapeutic approach using radionuclide combined with somatostatin analog peptide for inoperable or metastatic neuroendocrine tumors. Aims: Hematologic toxicities including late-onset myeloid neoplasms have been reported after PRRT; however, therapy-related chronic myeloid leukemia (TR-CML) following PRRT is a relatively rare entity. Methods: We present a 64-year-old male who received PRRT for pancreas neuroendocrine tumor and then developed TR-CML 60 months after the initiation of PRRT. The patient responded well to imatinib therapy. Results: Patients with TR-CML generally have similar tyrosine kinase inhibitor responses and outcomes when compared to de novo cases. Conclusions: The physicians should be aware of the short-and long-term hematologic toxicities of PRRT including TR-CML, and careful monitoring is mandatory in this group of patients.
Introduction. Hepatic metastases of gastric adenocarcinomas are frequently observed due to the drainage into portal vein. Intestinal metastases disseminate from gastrocolic and mesenteric ligaments but they are seen very rarely and in most cases detected in postmortem studies. Case Report. A 74-year-old female patient with no known history of disease. Her complaints on application were epigastric pain, burning, and constipation. Gastroscopy showed a submucosal mass in the greater curvature of fundus and in colonoscopy, a mass with polypoid appearance that narrows the lumen at the rectum was detected. No far metastases or pathology were detected. Pathology report from gastric biopsy material demonstrated well-differentiated adenocarcinoma. Cytokeratin 7 (CK7) was found to be extensively strongly positive, Cytokeratin 20 (CK20) was negative in the immunohistochemical staining of the biopsy obtained from rectosigmoid area. Conclusion. Gastric cancer is among the frequent cancers today, most of which are adenocarcinomas. Although most of the metastases are observed in the liver, lungs, lymph nodes, and peritoneum, it should be remembered that intestinal metastases may be seen without the presence of any other metastatic focus. Our case is the first in literature reporting a rectum metastasis without any other organ metastasis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.