Background:Reasoning refers to logical thinking involving problem-solving and decision-making skills. Physical Education teachers need to manage teaching and learning processes efficiently to build reasoning ability among students. The purpose of this study was to identify the students' reasoning achievement level based on the net and wall category using RSAT in Physical Education. Methods: A quasi-experimental design was used in this study in four schools in the district of Hilir Perak, Perak. The sample of the study consisted of 240 Form 2 students who used RSAT instrument (validity, r = .78; reliability, r = .74) in the pre-test and post-test. The treatment group underwent teaching and learning programs based on the net and wall TGfU model while the control group underwent the badminton technical model. The subjects of the control group received six teaching and learning sessions based on the plans provided. Results: The pre-test result of treatment group showed overall (M = 2.21; SD = 0.30) compared to the control group (M = 2.18; SD = 0.43). The students of the treatment group (M = 3.64; SD = 0.67) showed higher mean score compared to control group (M = 2.88; SD = 0.82) in post-test. The achievement level of the treatment group students showed that the majority of respondents achieved good level (n = 85; 60.70%) while the control group achieved pass level (n = 62; 44.30%). Conclusion:The study concluded that the use of RSAT could improve the reasoning level among students holistically and comprehensively. The implication of the study suggested an RSAT instrument to be used as an alternative instrument for determining the level of the learning domain based on reasoning to achieve higher-order thinking skills.
this study was designed to assess students reasoning achievement based on net and wall category, using Games Performance Assessment Instrument (GPAI) in Physical Education. The design used in this study was Quasi experimental design which consist of 240 form II students in the district of Hilir Perak, Perak. The treatment group is allowed to undergo teaching and learning programs based on net and wall TGfU mode, while; the control group undergo Technical Model. The students reasoning achievement were determined using percentage statistics such as mean and standard deviation; while the research hypothesis were answered using ANCOVA analysis. The pre-test result of the treatment group showed overall (M = 2.04; SD = 0.48) compared to the control group which showed overall (M = 2.00; SD = 0.38); meanwhile the treatment group showed overall (M = 3.84; SD = 0.77) in the post-test which is higher when compared the control group which showed overall (M = 3.19; SD = 0.96) in the post-test. The reasoning achievement of the students at excellent level showed that the treatment group (n = 57; 40.70%) is higher than control group (n = 27; 19.30%).From these results, it was evidenced that there was a significant difference between the study group that was adjusted with the pre-test and post-test F (1, 276) = 0.93, P = 0.336. The implication of this study suggested that GPAI can be used as an alternative instrument for determining the level of learning domain based on reasoning to achieve higher order thinking skills.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.