Hypertension, an important cause of chronic kidney disease, is characterized by peritubular capillary (PTC) loss. Circulating levels of endothelial microparticles (EMPs) reflect systemic endothelial injury. We hypothesized that systemic and urinary PTC-EMPs levels would reflect renal microvascular injury in hypertensive patients. We prospectively measured by flow-cytometry renal vein, inferior vena cava, and urinary levels of EMPs in essential (EH, n=14) and renovascular (RVH, n=24) hypertensive patients, and compared them with peripheral blood and urinary levels in healthy volunteers (HVs, n=14). PTC-EMPs were identified as urinary exosomes positive for the PTC marker plasmalemmal-vesicle-associated protein. In 7 RVH patients, PTC and fibrosis were also quantified in renal biopsy, and in 18 RVH patients, PTC-EMPs were measured again 3 months after continued medical therapy with or without stenting (n=9 each). Renal vein and systemic PTC-EMPs levels were not different among the groups, whereas their urinary levels were elevated in both RVH and EH vs. HVs (56.8±12.7 and 62.8±10.7 vs. 34.0±17.8%, both p≤0.001). Urinary PTC-EMPs levels correlated directly with blood pressure and inversely with estimated glomerular filtration rate. Furthermore, in RVH, urinary PTC-EMPs levels correlated directly with stenotic-kidney hypoxia, histological PTC count, and fibrosis, and inversely with cortical perfusion. Three months after treatment, the change in urinary PTC-EMPs levels correlated inversely with a change in renal function (r=−0.582, p=0.011). Therefore, urinary PTC-EMPs levels are increased in hypertensive patients, and may reflect renal microcirculation injury, whereas systemic PTC-EMPs levels are unchanged. Urinary PTC-EMPs may be useful as novel biomarkers of intrarenal capillary loss.
Aims:Patients with renovascular hypertension (RVH) exhibit elevated urinary mtDNA copy numbers, considered to constitute surrogate markers of renal mitochondrial injury. The modest success of percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty (PTRA) in restoring renal function in RVH has been postulated to be partly attributable to acute reperfusion injury. We hypothesized that mitoprotection during revascularization would ameliorate PTRA-induced renal mitochondrial injury, reflected in elevated urinary mtDNA copy numbers and improve blood pressure and functional outcomes 3 months later. Methods: We prospectively measured urinary copy number of the mtDNA genes COX3 and ND1 using qPCR in RVH patients before and 24 hrs after PTRA, performed during IV infusion of vehicle (n = 8) or the mitoprotective drug elamipretide (ELAM, 0.05 mg/kg/h, n = 6). Five healthy volunteers (HV) served as controls.Urinary mtDNA levels were also assessed in RVH and normal pigs (n = 7 each), in which renal mitochondrial structure and density were studied ex-vivo. Results: Baseline urinary mtDNA levels were elevated in all RVH patients vs HV and directly correlated with serum creatinine levels. An increase in urinary mtDNA 24 hours after PTRA was blunted in PTRA+ELAM vs PTRA+Placebo. Furthermore, 3-months after PTRA, systolic blood pressure decreased and estimated glomerular filtration rate increased only in ELAM-treated subjects. In RVH pigs, mitochondrial damage was observed using electron microscopy in tubular cells and elevated urinary mtDNA levels correlated inversely with renal mitochondrial density. Conclusions: PTRA leads to an acute rise in urinary mtDNA, reflecting renal mitochondrial injury that in turn inhibits renal recovery. Mitoprotection might minimize PTRA-associated mitochondrial injury and improve renal outcomes after revascularization. K E Y W O R D Smitochondria, mtDNA, PTRA, renovascular hypertension, revascularization 2 of 9 | EIRIN Et al.
Background Hypertension may be associated with renal cellular injury. Cells in distress release extracellular vesicles ( EV s), and their numbers in urine may reflect renal injury. Cellular senescence, an irreversible growth arrest in response to a noxious milieu, is characterized by release of proinflammatory cytokines. We hypothesized that EV s released by senescent nephron cells can be identified in urine of patients with hypertension. Methods and Results We recruited patients with essential hypertension ( EH ) or renovascular hypertension and healthy volunteers (n=14 each). Renal oxygenation was assessed using magnetic resonance imaging and blood samples collected from both renal veins for cytokine‐level measurements. EV s isolated from urine samples were characterized by imaging flow cytometry based on specific markers, including p16 (senescence marker), calyxin (podocytes), urate transporter 1 (proximal tubules), uromodulin (ascending limb of Henle's loop), and prominin‐2 (distal tubules). Overall percentage of urinary p16+ EV s was elevated in EH and renovascular hypertension patients compared with healthy volunteers and correlated inversely with renal function and directly with renal vein cytokine levels. Urinary levels of p16 + /urate transporter 1 + were elevated in all hypertensive subjects compared with healthy volunteers, whereas p16 + /prominin‐2 + levels were elevated only in EH versus healthy volunteers and p16 + /uromodulin + in renovascular hypertension versus EH . Conclusions Levels of p16 + EV s are elevated in urine of hypertensive patients and may reflect increased proximal tubular cellular senescence. In EH , EV s originate also from distal tubules and in renovascular hypertension from Henle's loop. Hence, urinary EV s levels may be useful to identify intrarenal sites of cellular senescence.
BMI, body mass index; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; NS, not significant; SDP, systolic blood pressure; sGFR, single-kidney glomerular filtration rate. Mean AE SD, median (Q1-Q3), and P values were determined by analysis of variance test. a c 2 test, and b Kruskal-Wallis test.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.