Objective: To consider the challenges of communicating COVID-19 directives to culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) communities in Melbourne and Australia, and present evidence-based solutions to influence policy and practice on promoting relevant health behaviours. Type of program or service: We reflect on the experiences of CALD communities during the COVID-19 crisis, and particularly the role of community leaders in shaping health behaviours in their communities. Methods: This article draws on a series of dialogues between CALD community and advocacy leaders, and health behaviour change scientists in July 2020. We present the challenges experienced, and solutions offered, by CALD leaders in communicating health information throughout the pandemic and consider the importance of behavioural and implementation science in reducing inequities in healthcare communication. Results: During the Covid-19 pandemic, CALD leaders have played a critical role in filling gaps in government messaging by providing up-to-date health advice and cultivating community support for relevant health behaviours (e.g., physical distancing, testing, hand hygiene). Nevertheless, attempts to communicate recommended health behaviours may not be reaching, and/or understood by, all members of CALD communities. In synthesizing the accounts of CALD leaders, three key findings emerged: first, partnerships between CALD leaders, communities and government are key, including the establishment of a national CALD advisory group on COVID-19; second, shifting knowledge into action requires moving beyond disseminating information to designing tailored solutions to reflect the diversity in our society; and third, the diverse needs and circumstances of people and communities must be at the centre of health communication and behaviour change strategies. Implementation science is needed to action the solutions offered by CALD leaders for equity of access and outcomes in COVID-19 health support. Lessons learnt: Insights from behavioural and implementation science can inform communication strategies that help align human behaviour with the recommendations of health experts. This coupled with sustained partnership and collaboration with CALD communities, understanding the cultural context and the appropriate tailoring and delivery of communications will ensure health related messages are not lost in translation. These lessons should be applied not only to the current pandemic but to post-pandemic social and economic recovery.
Governments worldwide are increasingly engaging service users to reform public policies and services and enhance public value. Survivors of gender-based violence (GBV) are one group seeking to be heard by governments and gradually being engaged to improve policy outcomes. However, the history of the victims’ rights movement and feminist scholarship on political institutions indicate significant risks for survivors in these engagements with the state. This article examines the nature of these risks and how they are experienced and challenged, through a case study analysis of the implementation of the Australian state of Victoria’s Victim Survivors’ Advisory Council. Analysing government reports and interviews with survivors and policymakers, the article investigates how the state asserts control over survivors under the guise of co-production, inadvertently compromising public value creation. Informed by a feminist institutionalist lens, our analysis finds that efforts to address the power imbalances and gendered norms reflected in the informal rules of co-production are likely to better realise public value in terms of improved outcomes for all members of society, especially those experiencing GBV. The co-production risks we highlight and the ways to mitigate them we suggest are also relevant to other areas of co-production with other marginalised service users.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.