Homologous recombination is a double-strand break repair pathway required for resistance to DNA damage and maintaining genomic integrity. In mitotically dividing vertebrate cells, the primary proteins involved in homologous recombination repair are RAD51 and the five RAD51 paralogs, RAD51B, RAD51C, RAD51D, XRCC2, and XRCC3. In the absence of Rad51d, human and mouse cells fail to proliferate, and mice defective for Rad51d die before birth, likely as a result of genomic instability and p53 activation. Here, we report that a p53 deletion is sufficient to extend the life span of Rad51d-deficient embryos by up to 6 days and rescue the cell lethal phenotype. The Rad51dembryo-derived fibroblasts were sensitive to DNA-damaging agents, particularly interstrand cross-links, and exhibited extensive chromosome instability including aneuploidy, chromosome fragments, deletions, and complex rearrangements. Additionally, loss of Rad51d resulted in increased centrosome fragmentation and reduced levels of radiation-induced RAD51-focus formation. Spontaneous frequencies of sister chromatid exchange were not affected by the absence of Rad51d, but sister chromatid exchange frequencies did fail to be induced upon challenge with the DNA cross-linking agent mitomycin C. These findings support a crucial role for mammalian RAD51D in normal development, recombination, and maintaining mammalian genome stability. (Cancer Res 2005; 65(6): 2089-96)

Objectives: PD-L1 expression on tumour cells can guide the use of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immune modulators to treat patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Heterogeneity of PD-L1 expression both within and between tumour sites is a well-documented phenomenon that compromises its predictive power. Our aim was to better characterise the pattern and extent of PD-L1 heterogeneity with a view to optimising tumour sampling and improve its accuracy as a biomarker. Materials and methods: Expression of PD-L1 was assessed by immunochemistry using the SP263 clone in 107 resected primary NSCLCs and their nodal metastases. Intra-tumoural heterogeneity, defined as 'small-scale' (mm²), 'medium-scale' (cm²) and 'large-scale' (between tumour blocks), was assessed by digital imaging using a novel 'squares method'. Inter-tumoural heterogeneity between the primary tumours and their nodal metastases and between N1 and N2 nodal stages was also assessed. Results: The majority of tumours demonstrated intra-tumoural heterogeneity (small-scale 78%, medium-scale 50%, large-scale 46%). Inter-tumoural heterogeneity between the primary and nodal metastases was present in 53% of cases and, in 17%, between N1 and N2 disease. These differences were occasionally sufficient to lead to discrepancy across the ≥1%, ≥25% and ≥50% cut-offs used to guide therapy. Conclusion: Heterogeneity of PD-L1 expression is common, variable in scale and extent, and carries significant implications for its accuracy as a predictive biomarker. Extensive sampling reduces, but cannot eliminate, this inaccuracy.

Patient management based on HER2 status in breast carcinoma is an archetypical example of personalized medicine but remains hampered by equivocal testing and intratumoral heterogeneity. We developed a fully automated, quantitative, bright-field in situ hybridization technique (RNAscope), applied it to quantify single-cell HER2 mRNA levels in 132 invasive breast carcinomas, and compared the results with those by real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) and Food and Drug Administration-approved methods, including fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), IHC, chromogenic in situ hybridization, and dual in situ hybridization. Both RNAscope and qPCR were 97.3% concordant with FISH in cases in which FISH results were unequivocal. RNAscope was superior to qPCR in cases with intratumoral heterogeneity or equivocal FISH results. This novel assay may enable ultimate HER2 status resolution as a reflex test for current testing algorithms. Quantitative in situ RNA measurement at the single-cell level may be broadly applicable in companion diagnostic applications.

BRISH analysis of κ and λ immunoglobulin mRNA expression is a sensitive tool for establishing LCR in B-cell NHL when FCM results are not available.

N Context.-Distinction between primary lung carcinomas and metastases from other sites, especially the urinary tract, is a common diagnostic dilemma. As urothelial carcinomas can demonstrate a broad range of morphology and frequently demonstrate squamous differentiation, discerning metastatic urothelial carcinoma to the lung from primary pulmonary squamous cell carcinoma can be challenging.Objective.-To investigate immunostains that may aid in the distinction of urothelial carcinoma metastatic to the lung.Design.-Staining patterns of 14 markers in primary urothelial carcinoma of the bladder and primary squamous cell carcinoma of the lung were examined to establish a diagnostic panel. These antibodies were subsequently tested on tumors taken from 30 patients with a paired urinary tract and metastatic lung lesion.Results.-The best markers to distinguish poorly differentiated metastatic urothelial carcinoma from primary pulmonary squamous cell carcinoma were CK7, CK20, GATA-3, CK14, desmoglein-3, and uroplakin III, with the utility of the latter dependent upon the quantity of tissue available for analysis. The observed percentage positive staining in nonmetastatic urothelial carcinoma versus primary pulmonary squamous cell carcinoma with these antibodies was as follows: CK7 (100% versus 33%), CK20 (54% versus 7%), GATA-3 (78% versus 23%), CK14 (32% versus 77%), desmoglein-3 (11% versus 87%), and uroplakin III (14% versus 0%). Similar expression patterns were observed among the paired cases.Conclusion.-When interpreted in correlation with clinical history and histomorphology, a panel of immunostains including CK7, CK20, GATA-3, CK14, desmoglein-3, and uroplakin III may be a useful adjunct in the distinction of metastatic urothelial carcinoma to the lung.

Introduction: The hepatocyte growth factor receptor mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET) is reported to be a negative prognostic marker in EGFR-mutant NSCLC and involved in resistance to EGFR inhibitors. Emibetuzumab, a humanized immunoglobulin G4 monoclonal bivalent MET antibody, blocks ligand-dependent and ligand-independent hepatocyte growth factor/MET signaling. This phase 2 study compared erlotinib with and without emibetuzumab in first-line treatment of EGFR-mutant metastatic NSCLC.

Homologous recombination (HR) is a mechanism for repairing DNA interstrand crosslinks and double-strand breaks. In mammals, HR requires the activities of the RAD51 family (RAD51, RAD51B, RAD51C, RAD51D, XRCC2, XRCC3 and DMC1), each of which contains conserved ATP binding sequences (Walker Motifs A and B). RAD51D is a DNA-stimulated ATPase that interacts directly with RAD51C and XRCC2. To test the hypothesis that ATP binding and hydrolysis by RAD51D are required for the repair of interstrand crosslinks, site-directed mutations in Walker Motif A were generated, and complementation studies were performed in Rad51d-deficient mouse embryonic fibroblasts. The K113R and K113A mutants demonstrated a respective 96 and 83% decrease in repair capacity relative to wild-type. Further examination of these mutants, by yeast two-hybrid analyses, revealed an 8-fold reduction in the ability to associate with RAD51C whereas interaction with XRCC2 was retained at a level similar to the S111T control. These cell-based studies are the first evidence that ATP binding and hydrolysis by RAD51D are required for efficient HR repair of DNA interstrand crosslinks.

Assessment of ERBB2 (HER2) status in breast carcinomas has become critical in determining response to the humanised monoclonal antibody trastuzumab. The current joint College of American Pathologists and the American Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines for the evaluation of HER2 status in breast carcinoma involve testing by immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH). However, neither of these modalities is without limitations. Novel bright field in situ hybridisation techniques continue to provide viable alternatives to FISH testing. While these techniques are not limited to evaluation of the HER2 gene, the extensive number of studies comparing bright field in situ techniques with other methods of assessing HER2 status allow a robust evaluation of this approach. Analysis of the literature demonstrates that, when used to assess HER2 gene status, bright field in situ hybridisation demonstrates excellent concordance with FISH results. The average percentage agreement in an informal analysis of studies comparing HER2 amplification by chromogenic in situ hybridisation with FISH was 96% (SD 4%); κ coefficients ranged from 0.76 to 1.0. Although a much smaller number of studies are available for review, similar levels of concordance have been reported in studies comparing HER2 amplification by methods employing metallography (silver in situ hybridisation) with FISH. A summary of the advancements in bright field in situ hybridisation, with focus on those techniques with clinical applications of interest to the practicing pathologist, is presented.