Implementing multicomponent diffusion models in reacting-flow simulations is computationally expensive due to the challenges involved in calculating diffusion coefficients. Instead, mixture-averaged diffusion treatments are typically used to avoid these costs. However, to our knowledge, the accuracy and appropriateness of the mixture-averaged diffusion models has not been verified for three-dimensional turbulent premixed flames. In this study we propose a fast, efficient, low-memory algorithm and use that to evaluate the role of multicomponent mass diffusion in reacting-flow simulations. Direct numerical simulation of these flames is performed by implementing the Stefan-Maxwell equations in NGA. A semi-implicit algorithm decreases the computational expense of inverting the full multicomponent ordinary diffusion array while maintaining accuracy and fidelity. We demonstrate the algorithm to be stable, and its performance scales approximately with the number of species squared. We first verify the method by performing one-dimensional simulations of premixed hydrogen flames and compare with matching cases in Cantera. As an initial study of multicomponent diffusion, we simulate premixed, three-dimensional turbulent hydrogen flames, neglecting secondary Soret and Dufour effects. Simulation conditions are carefully selected to match previously published results and ensure valid comparison. Our results show that using the mixture-averaged diffusion assumption lead to a 15 % under-prediction of the normalized turbulent flame speed for premixed hydrogen air flames. This large difference in the turbulent flame speed raises questions on the appropriateness of using the mixture-averaged diffusion assumption for DNS of moderate to high Karlovitz number flames.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Large hydrocarbon fuels are used for ground and air transportation and will be for the foreseeable future. Despite their extensive use, turbulent combustion of large hydrocarbon fuels, such as jet fuels, remains relatively poorly understood and difficult to predict. A key parameter when burning these fuels is the turbulent consumption speed, which is the velocity at which fuel and air are consumed through a turbulent flame front.Such information can be useful as a model input parameter and for validation of modeled results. In this study, turbulent consumption speeds were measured for three jet-like fuels using a premixed turbulent Bunsen burner. The burner was used to independently control turbulence intensity, unburned temperature, and equivalence ratio. Each fuel had similar heat releases (within 2 %), laminar flame speeds (within 5 to 15 %), and adiabatic flame temperatures. Despite this similarity, For constant Re D and turbulence intensity, A2 (i.e., jet-A) has the highest turbulent flame speeds and remains stable (i.e., without tip quenching) at lower φ than the other fuels evaluated. In contrast the C1 fuel, which contains no aromatics, has the slowest turbulent flame speeds and exhibits

No abstract

No abstract