BackgroundTo explore folk understandings of blood borne virus infection and infectiousness among injecting drug users in Kings Cross, Sydney.MethodsObservational fieldwork was conducted in Kings Cross over a four month period. In-depth interviews with 24 current injectors and 4 key informants recruited from King Cross were undertaken.ResultsHepatitis C (HCV) generated different meanings from HIV. HIV was considered "the dreaded" and generated fear of infection and dire disease progression. Whereas HCV was considered non-desirable but less threatening than HIV. The risks of transmitting HCV through sharing injecting paraphernalia was poorly understood. Some believed HCV infection was linked to poor hygiene and dirty water. Jaundice was mistakenly thought to indicate HCV infection and was used to gauge infectiousness. Many were confused about their current hepatitis C serostatus. Some participants thought they had a "dormant antibody" or that they had a "mild case" of infection. Participants were unsure what this meant for their own health or for their potential to infect others.ConclusionParticipants displayed confusion about transmission risks for hepatitis C, conflating blood awareness and hygiene health promotion messages. Participants' reliance on the symptom of jaundice to gauge serostatus places them at risk of transmitting and contracting HCV. Participants were confused about what a positive HCV diagnosis meant for their own health and their ability to infect others. Education is needed to debunk misconceptions about jaundice and clarify medical terms such as 'antibody' at the time of diagnosis. Further clarification of messages about injecting hygiene and blood awareness are also required.
Introduction National guidelines give recommendations regarding cancer surveillance follow-up. In many early staged cancers radiographic imaging and labs are not routinely recommended unless patients are symptomatic. This can cause a gap in care because commonly when patients present symptomatically, they have progressed and transitioned to later-stage cancer. This study demonstrates how circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) can be used alongside current guidelines to help screen patients for recurrence in the surveillance setting. Methods A retrospective chart review was performed. Fifty-five charts were reviewed of patients who received ctDNA testing drawn in follow-up after their primary tumor or metastatic disease was rendered surgically or radiographically disease-free. A customized signature profile, using the sixteen most prevalent genomic markers from a patient’s primary tumor or biopsy, is developed by whole-exome sequencing. Serial blood draws are then drawn to assess for specific DNA markers using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays. Results Fifty-five charts were reviewed in patients who had stage I-III breast, pancreatic, melanoma, and colorectal cancer. Of the fifty-five, a total of seven had a positive test. Of the seven positive tests, six patients were found to have recurrent/metastatic disease. One positive test was performed four weeks postoperatively but by the second draw ten weeks postoperatively had non-detectable ctDNA. The remaining forty-eight patients had non-detectable ctDNA levels and to date have not had any evidence of recurrence based on standard follow-up guidelines. Conclusion The utilization of ctDNA in the surveillance setting can be used to help detect recurrence in the surveillance setting.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.