and seminar participants in Washington DC and Moscow for useful comments. All remaining errors are our own. The views expressed here are our own and should not be attributed to the World Bank Group.
The relevance of the study is that investment activities associated with investments in fixed assets relate to the "system-forming" activity of the state and are articulated in a number of federal documents and national projects. As it is noted in the Decree of the President of Russia "On National Development Goals of the Russian Federation for the Period until 2030" the sustained economic growth is associated with a high level of investment activity. It is planned to increase capital investment in fixed assets by 2030 by at least 70 percent compared to 2020. The author's version of blocks of factors of investment in fixed assets is formed according to a content criterion. Hierarchical classification of Russian regions into qualitatively homogeneous groups according to factor indicators of regional promotion of investments in fixed assets by the method of cluster analysis based on interregional comparisons was performed. A federal approach to the analysis of trends of indicators of investments in fixed assets has been implemented and their forecasting for 2021-2022 has been carried out. The proposed analytical and methodological support for the executive authorities of the federal and regional levels serves as the basis for the development of the appropriate measures to ensure the conditions for growth of investments in fixed assets and sustainable economic growth.
This article considers at the university level the graduates’ income information, as well as budgetary and private cost estimates to determine budgetary and private impact of education using the calculation of internal rate of return. Since the graduates’ income information is available for only three-year period after the graduation, the synthetic profile of the graduates’ income during their lives is constructed according to the regional microdata. Results of the calculation show that the average impact of higher education is about 9 %, which is consistent with other estimates. In addition to list of universities indicating their impact, the article presents conclusions and recommendations, based on the analysis of the impact’s types and the correlation with other parameters, particularly with Unified State Examination scores for entry into higher education. The article’s value consists in demonstration of the possible approach for estimates, considering impact of investment in higher education at the university, faculty or department level. Researchers of the future can build on methodology and estimates, presented in this article, to obtain more accurate and reliable data on private impact of investment in higher education.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.