For about three decades, airborne electromagnetic (AEM) systems have been used for groundwater exploration purposes. Airborne systems are appropriate for large-scale and efficient groundwater surveying. Due to the dependency of the electrical conductivity on both the clay content of the host material and the mineralization of the water, electromagnetic systems are suitable for providing information about the aquifer structures and water quality, respectively.More helicopter than fixed-wing systems are used in airborne groundwater surveys. Helicopterborne frequency-domain electromagnetic (HEM) systems use a towed rigid-boom. Helicopterborne time-domain (HTEM) systems, which use a large transmitter loop and a small receiver within or above the transmitter, are generally designed for mineral exploration purposes but recent developments have made some of these systems usable for groundwater purposes as well.The quantity measured, the secondary magnetic field, depends on the subsurface conductivity distribution. Due to the skin-effect, the penetration depths of the AEM fields depend on the system characteristics used: high-frequency data/early-time channels describe the shallower parts of the conducting subsurface and the low-frequency data/late-time channels the deeper parts. Typical investigation depths range from some ten metres (conductive grounds) to several hundred metres (resistive grounds), where the HEM systems are appropriate for shallow to medium deep (about 1-100 m) and the HTEM systems for medium deep to deep (about 10-400 m) investigations.Generally, the secondary field values are inverted into resistivities and depths using homogeneous or layered half-space models. As the footprint of AEM systems is rather small, one-dimensional interpretation of AEM data is sufficient in most cases and single-site inversion procedures are widely used. Laterally constrained inversion of AEM data often improves the stability of the inversion models, particularly for noisy data. Higher dimensional inversion is still not possible for standard-size surveys.Based on typical field examples the advantages as well as the limitations of AEM surveys compared to long-established ground-based geophysical methods used in groundwater surveys are discussed. In a case history from a German island an airborne frequency-domain system is used to successfully locate freshwater lenses on top of saltwater. An example from Denmark shows how a timedomain system is used to locate large-scale buried structures forming ideal groundwater aquifers. ity on a) the salinity of the groundwater, i.e., the groundwater quality, and b) the clay content of the subsurface, i.e., the aquifer conditions and protection level (e.g., Kirsch 2006).The application of geoelectrical and electromagnetic methods on ground (e.g., McNeill 1990;Binley and Kemna 2005;Everett and Meju 2005;Ernstson and Kirsch 2006) has a long tradition in groundwater exploration. AEM, however, was introduced for mineral exploration and -compared to that -airborne groundwater exploration is ...
We tested a new robust concept for the calculation of depth of investigation (DOI) that is valid for any 1D electromagnetic (EM) geophysical model. A good estimate of DOI is crucial when building geologic and hydrological models from EM data sets because the validity of the models varies strongly with data noise and the resistivity of the layers themselves. For diffusive methods, such as groundbased and airborne electromagnetic, it is not possible to define an unambiguous depth below which there is no information on the resistivity structure and a measure of DOI is therefore to what depth the model can be considered reliable. The method we presented is based on the actual model output from the inversion process and we used the actual system response, contrary to assuming, e.g., planar waves over a homogeneous half-space, the widely used skin depth calculation. Equally important, the data noise and the number of data points are integrated into the calculation. Our methodology is based on a recalculated sensitivity (Jacobian) matrix of the final model and thus it can be used on any model type for which a sensitivity matrix can be calculated. Unlike other sensitivity matrix methods, we defined a global and absolute threshold value contrary to defining a relative (such as 5%), sensitivity limit. The threshold value will apply to all 1D inverted data and will thus produce comparable numbers of DOI.
Development of more time-efficient and airborne geophysical data acquisition systems during the past decades have made large-scale mapping attractive and affordable in the planning and administration of e.g., groundwater resources or raw material deposits. The handling and optimized use of large geophysical data sets covering large geographic areas requires a system that allows data to be easily stored, extracted, interpreted, combined and used one time after another with different purposes. Such an integrated system for management and utilization of hydrogeophysical data on a national scale has been developed during the past decade in Denmark. This data handling system includes a comprehensive national geophysical data base (the GERDA data base), a national data base for borehole information (the Jupiter data base), a program package for processing, interpretation and visualization of electrical and electromagnetic data as well as preparation of these data for upload to the geophysical data base (the Aarhus Workbench) and finally a 3D visualization and modelling tool used for geological modelling and data quality control. The Aarhus Workbench program package allows visualization and analysis of subsets of data from the geophysical data base, which may include data from many individual mapping campaigns. The 3D visualization and modelling tool uses data from the geophysical and the borehole data bases directly; moreover, it handles maps and grids produced in the Aarhus Workbench.The integrated system for management of hydrogeophysical data allows management of large amounts of data collected over several years in different mapping campaigns, of different consultant companies and with different geophysical methods and instrumentation. It is now used by all partners involved in the groundwater mapping in Denmark. The system promotes reuse of geophysical data and models in future mapping projects, as well as easing and promoting the use of geophysical data in the geological modelling. The integrated system secures transfer of documentation all the way from data acquisition over processing and inversion of the geophysical data to geological modelling through storage of data acquisition parameters, data processing parameters, inversion parameters and uncertainties on data and models in the geophysical data base.The benefits of the large amount of geophysical data gathered in the national geophysical data base and utilized by the two program packages are invaluable for all future groundwater planning and administration. growth and water contamination; however, interest is also fuelled by the changing climate.In Denmark, the water supply is decentralized and 99 per cent of the water supply is based on groundwater of a high natural quality. It is Danish policy to maintain groundwater of high quality for drinking water. Increasing problems with water quality in the 1990s due to urban development and contamination from industrial and agricultural sources made the Danish Government
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.